@article{JTD6492,
author = {Carmen Sílvia Valente Barbas and Ary Serpa Neto},
title = {New puzzles for the use of non-invasive ventilation for immunosuppressed patients},
journal = {Journal of Thoracic Disease},
volume = {8},
number = {1},
year = {2016},
keywords = {},
abstract = {On October 27, 2015, Lemile and colleagues published an article in JAMA entitled “Effect of Noninvasive Ventilation vs. Oxygen Therapy on Mortality among Immunocompromised Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial”, which investigated the effects of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in 28-day mortality of 374 critically ill immunosuppressed patients. The authors found that among immunosuppressed patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure, early NIV compared with oxygen therapy alone did not reduce 28-day mortality. Furthermore, different from the previous publications, there were no significant differences in ICU-acquired infections, duration of mechanical ventilation, or lengths of ICU or hospital stays. The study power was limited, median oxygen flow used was higher than used before or 9 L/min, NIV settings provided tidal volumes higher than what is considered protective nowadays or from 7 to 10 mL/kg of ideal body weight and the hypoxemic respiratory failure was moderate to severe (median PaO2/FIO2 was around 140), a group prone to failure in noninvasive ventilatory support. Doubts arose regarding the early use of NIV in immunosuppressed critically ill patients with non-hypercapnic hypoxemic respiratory failure that need to be solved in the near future.},
issn = {2077-6624}, url = {https://jtd.amegroups.org/article/view/6492}
}