Increased mortality in lung cancer patients with same-lobe, multi-lobe, or mixed nodules: a retrospective study of 166,097 participants from the SEER database
Original Article

Increased mortality in lung cancer patients with same-lobe, multi-lobe, or mixed nodules: a retrospective study of 166,097 participants from the SEER database

Jiayue Ye1, Jiacong Liu1, Yucheng Ma1, Yiqing Wang1, Pinghui Xia1, Wang Lv1, Sheng Hu2, Jian Hu1,3

1Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; 2Department of Thoracic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China; 3Key Laboratory of Clinical Evaluation Technology for Medical Device of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: J Ye, Y Ma, Y Wang, S Hu; (II) Administrative support: Y Wang, J Liu, P Xia, J Hu; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: J Ye, Y Wang, S Hu, W Lv; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: J Ye, Y Wang, Y Ma, S Hu, W Lv; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: J Ye, J Liu; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Correspondence to: Jian Hu, PhD. Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou 310003, China; Key Laboratory of Clinical Evaluation Technology for Medical Device of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China. Email: dr_hujian@zju.edu.cn; Wang Lv, MD. Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou 310003, China. Email: xx00139@126.com; Sheng Hu, MD. Department of Thoracic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 1, Minde Road, Nanchang 330006, China. Email: 401441619010@email.ncu.edu.cn.

Background: Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, with a particularly high burden in China and a poor prognosis mainly due to late-stage diagnosis and limited effective treatments. Large-sample survival analyses are lacking for patients with lung cancer who nodules of present with same-lobe, multi-lobe, or mixed nodules, as well as those with multiple separate nodules. This study aimed to assess the survival rates of patients with lung cancer by focusing on overall survival and disease-specific survival.

Methods: A large dataset of 166,097 patients with lung cancer was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Survival analyses, including univariate, multivariate, and stratified analyses, and survival curves, were conducted using Empower Stats, SPSS 24, and GraphPad. Eight covariates, including age, sex, and race, were adjusted.

Results: Compared to patients with a single-tumor, those with same-lobe nodules, multi-lobe nodules, or mixed-distribution nodules had a significantly increased mortality risk. Furthermore, stratified analysis indicated that, compared to patients with a single-tumor, the increase in mortality risk was substantially greater among patients who underwent surgical treatment than among those who did not receive surgery.

Conclusions: Patients with lung cancer who have satellite nodules located in the same-lobe or in different lobes on the same side as the primary tumor have a significantly higher mortality risk than those with single tumors. Surgical intervention in these patients further increases this risk.

Keywords: Lung cancer; satellite nodules; overall survival (OS); disease-specific survival (DSS)


Submitted Mar 05, 2025. Accepted for publication May 08, 2025. Published online Jul 28, 2025.

doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-445


Highlight box

Key findings

• This study demonstrates that the presence of satellite nodules in lung cancer significantly influences survival outcomes, serving as a critical prognostic factor. Specifically, patients with satellite nodules exhibit reduced overall survival compared to those without.

What is known and what is new?

• It is well established that tumor characteristics, including size, stage, and lymph node involvement, significantly influence cancer prognosis. However, the prognostic significance of satellite nodules remains less clearly defined.

• This study contributes novel insights by systematically analyzing survival data and demonstrating that satellite nodules independently predict adverse outcomes.

What is the implication, and what should change now?

• The findings highlight the need for increased clinical focus on satellite nodules during the processes of staging and treatment planning. Integrating the presence of satellite nodules into prognostic models may enhance risk stratification and facilitate more individualized therapeutic strategies. Future research should aim to elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms influencing these outcomes, potentially revealing novel therapeutic targets.


Introduction

Lung cancer remains a major global health concern, ranking among the leading causes of cancer-related deaths. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), lung cancer accounts for approximately 1.82 million fatalities annually, representing nearly 18.7% of all cancer-related deaths globally (1). In 2022, China recorded the highest number of new lung cancer cases among all cancers (1.06 million) and the highest number of lung cancer-related deaths (730,000) (2). Despite advancements in early detection and treatment, the prognosis of lung cancer remains poor, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 19% in the United States (3).

This low survival rate is primarily because most lung cancer cases are diagnosed at later stages when treatment options are less effective. Despite advances in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, lung cancer is poorly treated, primarily because many cases are diagnosed at advanced stages when treatment options are ineffective (4). Lung cancer has multiple subtypes, each with distinct molecular signatures and varying responses to treatment (5). Moreover, resistance to chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies may develop over time (6,7). Surgical resection remains the mainstay of curative treatment for lung cancer (8). Significant challenges persist in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of lung cancer with independent nodules within the same lobe or multiple independent nodules across different lobes (9-12).

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database serves as the definitive source of cancer statistics in the United States. The SEER program provides cancer statistics to support efforts to reduce the cancer burden in the U.S. population. SEER collects and publishes cancer incidence and survival data from population-based cancer registries covering approximately 48% of the U.S. population. These data encompass all cancer cases reported in 22 geographic regions of the United States. As these regions are representative of the demographics of the entire U.S. population, SEER accounts for diverse populations across the country.The SEER also reports mortality data provided by the National Center for Health Statistics. This database includes detailed demographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics, making it an important resource for epidemiological studies and cancer research (13-15).

This study aimed to assess the survival rates of patients with lung cancer by focusing on overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). It also provides survival data for clinical research involving multiple independent nodules occurring within the same or different lobes of the ipsilateral lung. We present this article in accordance with the STROBE reporting checklist (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-2025-445/rc).


Methods

Data sources

Data for this study were obtained from the SEER database (https://seer.cancer.gov/), specifically the Incidence SEER Research Plus Data [17 registries, November 2021 Sub (2000–2019)]. This dataset represents approximately 26.5% of the U.S. population based on the 2020 Census, covering regions such as San Francisco-Oakland, Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, New Mexico, Seattle, Utah, and Atlanta. This study focused on cases of lung and bronchial cancers categorized under the Site Recode International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd Edition, WHO 2008 (https://seer.cancer.gov/siterecode/icdo3_dwhoheme/index.html). After excluding records with missing or unassessed data, the final sample comprised 166,097 participants. The details of the data screening process are provided in Figure S1. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. All the multiple nodules included in this study were confirmed to have the same histological type and were located in the same lung (ipsilateral presentation).

Variables

The main independent variable was the occurrence of separate tumor nodules in the ipsilateral lung, which were classified into four categories: (I) single tumors without intrapulmonary metastasis; (II) multiple nodules in different lobes; (III) multiple nodules in the same-lobe; and (IV) multiple nodules across both the same and different lobes. Eight covariates were analyzed: age, sex, race, histologic type, grade, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy.

Data processing and statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 24 (IBM) for frequency analysis and GraphPad Prism 8 to visualize survival curves, including overall survival and subgroup-specific survival. To assess survival data, life table analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and both univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were employed. Survival distributions across groups were compared using log-rank (Mantel-Cox), Breslow (generalized Wilcoxon), and Tarone-Ware tests. The mean survival times and survival rates at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 years were calculated for patients with lung cancer. EmpowerStats software and R (version 4.2.0) were used for multivariate analysis, with adjustments for eight covariates: age, sex, race, histological type, grade, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. An adjusted II model was used to account for these covariates in the analysis.


Results

Survival curve

Figure 1A shows the overall survival curve of patients with lung cancer, and Figure 1B shows the disease-specific mortality curve of patients with lung cancer. Figure 1C shows OS stratified by tumor burden. Survival ranked from highest to lowest as follows: single-tumor, same-lobe, multi-lobe, and mixed groups. Figure 1D depicts DSS by tumor group. DSS ranked: single-tumor > same-lobe > multi-lobe > mixed. Figure 2 depicts the Kaplan-Meier survival curves (OS and DSS) for patients with lung cancer stratified by eight covariates: age, sex, race, histologic type, grade, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Figure 2, A2 and B2 illustrate that the survival curves (OS and DSS) of female patients with lung cancer were higher than those of the male patients. Similarly, Figure 2, A4 and B4 show that the survival curves (OS and DSS) for patients with lung adenocarcinoma were higher than those for patients with squamous cell lung carcinoma.

Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier survival curves of lung cancer patients (OS and DSS). (A) OS curve. (B) DSS curve. (C) Prognosis of tumor nodules in different lobes and in the same lobe of the ipsilateral lung for lung cancer (OS). (D) Prognosis of tumor nodules in different lobes and in the same lobe of the ipsilateral lung for lung cancer (DSS). DSS, disease-specific survival; Hist, histological; mets, metastases; OS, overall survival.
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier survival curves of lung cancer patients stratified by covariates (OS and DSS). (A1) Age stratification (OS); (A2) sex stratification (OS); (A3) race stratification (OS); (A4) histologic type stratification (OS); (A5) grade stratification (OS); (A6) surgery stratification (OS); (A7) radiation stratification (OS); (A8) chemotherapy stratification (OS). (B1) age stratification (DSS); (B2) sex stratification (DSS); (B3) race stratification (DSS); (B4) histologic type stratification (DSS); (B5) grade stratification (DSS); (B6) surgery stratification (DSS); (B7) radiation stratification (DSS); (B8) chemotherapy stratification (DSS). DSS, disease-specific survival; OS, overall survival.

Basic situation and univariate analysis

Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of each variable, with the data stratified by the early OS and DSS columns. A total of 166,097 participants were included in this study. Table 1 details the stratification for the tumor group variable and the eight covariates. Table 2 presents the univariate analysis results (OS and DSS) for the independent variable, separate tumor nodules in the ipsilateral lung, and eight covariates. Compared to patients with lung cancer aged <60 years, no statistically significant difference was observed in the survival risk of those aged 65–69 years [OS: hazard ratio (HR) =1.016, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.993–1.040, P=0.18]. However, male patients with lung cancer exhibited increased mortality risks of 29.8% (OS) and 31.8% (DSS). Compared to patients with lung cancer who were identified as white, those who were identified as black had 8.4% and 7.2% higher mortality risks for OS and DSS, respectively. Patients with lung cancer who were identified as Asian and Pacific Islander showed a 9% reduced mortality risk (OS) and a 12% reduction in DSS-related mortality compared to those who were identified as white. Compared with patients with lung adenocarcinoma, those with squamous cell lung carcinoma had a 24% and 32% increased mortality risk for OS and DSS, respectively. Compared with patients with well-differentiated lung cancer, those with undifferentiated, poorly differentiated, and moderately differentiated lung cancers exhibited increased mortality risks of 434.8% (OS) and 319.3% (DSS), 267.1% (OS) and 201.2% (DSS), and 94.3% (OS) and 74.6% (DSS), respectively.

Table 1

Baseline table of variables

Variable Total
(n=166,097)
Overall survival Disease-specific survival
Alive
(n=52,985)
Dead
(n=113,112)
P value Alive or dead of other cause (n=73,960) Dead (attributable to this cancer) (n=92,137) P value
Survival months 21.719±26.072 38.717±32.057 13.756±17.834 <0.001 33.807±31.009 12.015±15.560 <0.001
Separate tumor nodules ipsilateral lung <0.001 <0.001
   Group 1 134,567 (81.017) 46,695 (88.129) 87,872 (77.686) 64,288 (86.923) 70,279 (76.277)
   Group 2 10,947 (6.591) 1,958 (3.695) 8,989 (7.947) 3,088 (4.175) 7,859 (8.530)
   Group 3 13,017 (7.837) 3,183 (6.007) 9,834 (8.694) 4,774 (6.455) 8,243 (8.946)
   Group 4 7,566 (4.555) 1,149 (2.169) 6,417 (5.673) 1,810 (2.447) 5,756 (6.247)
Age (years) 70.630±10.852 68.318±10.601 71.713±10.800 <0.001 69.938±10.743 71.185±10.907 <0.001
Age <0.001 <0.001
   Under 60 years old 25,664 (15.451) 10,021 (18.913) 15,643 (13.830) 11,746 (15.882) 13,918 (15.106)
   60–64 years 20,477 (12.328) 7,522 (14.196) 12,955 (11.453) 9,387 (12.692) 11,090 (12.036)
   65–69 years 27,348 (16.465) 9,958 (18.794) 17,390 (15.374) 12,918 (17.466) 14,430 (15.661)
   70–74 years 29,045 (17.487) 10,074 (19.013) 18,971 (16.772) 13,810 (18.672) 15,235 (16.535)
   75–79 years 27,141 (16.340) 8,144 (15.370) 18,997 (16.795) 12,203 (16.499) 14,938 (16.213)
   80+ years 36,422 (21.928) 7,266 (13.713) 29,156 (25.776) 13,896 (18.789) 22,526 (24.448)
Sex <0.001 <0.001
   Female 82,022 (49.382) 30,053 (56.720) 51,969 (45.945) 39,555 (53.482) 42,467 (46.091)
   Male 84,075 (50.618) 22,932 (43.280) 61,143 (54.055) 34,405 (46.518) 49,670 (53.909)
Race <0.001 <0.001
   White 130,472 (78.552) 40,920 (77.229) 89,552 (79.171) 57,856 (78.226) 72,616 (78.813)
   Black 15,384 (9.262) 4,556 (8.599) 10,828 (9.573) 6,470 (8.748) 8,914 (9.675)
   Asian or Pacific Islander 18,378 (11.065) 6,836 (12.902) 11,542 (10.204) 8,674 (11.728) 9,704 (10.532)
   Others 1,863 (1.122) 673 (1.270) 1,190 (1.052) 960 (1.298) 903 (0.980)
Histologic type <0.001 <0.001
   Adenocarcinoma 79,995 (48.162) 30,933 (58.381) 49,062 (43.375) 39,540 (53.461) 40,455 (43.907)
   Squamous cell carcinoma 33,941 (20.434) 9,549 (18.022) 24,392 (21.564) 14,803 (20.015) 19,138 (20.771)
   Others 52,161 (31.404) 12,503 (23.597) 39,658 (35.061) 19,617 (26.524) 32,544 (35.321)
Grade <0.001 <0.001
   Well differentiated; Grade I 9,401 (5.660) 5,525 (10.427) 3,876 (3.427) 6,855 (9.269) 2,546 (2.763)
   Moderately differentiated; Grade II 24,427 (14.706) 9,779 (18.456) 14,648 (12.950) 13,532 (18.296) 10,895 (11.825)
   Poorly differentiated; Grade III 30,241 (18.207) 6,828 (12.887) 23,413 (20.699) 10,865 (14.690) 19,376 (21.030)
   Undifferentiated; anaplastic; Grade IV 3,019 (1.818) 394 (0.744) 2,625 (2.321) 715 (0.967) 2,304 (2.501)
   Others 99,009 (59.609) 30,459 (57.486) 68,550 (60.604) 41,993 (56.778) 57,016 (61.882)
Surgery <0.001 <0.001
   Surgery performed 43,362 (26.106) 28,168 (53.162) 15,194 (13.433) 33,383 (45.137) 9,979 (10.831)
   No surgery performed 122,303 (73.633) 24,658 (46.538) 97,645 (86.326) 40,360 (54.570) 81,943 (88.936)
   Unknown 432 (0.260) 159 (0.300) 273 (0.241) 217 (0.293) 215 (0.233)
Radiation <0.001 <0.001
   Yes 63,768 (38.392) 18,259 (34.461) 45,509 (40.234) 25,834 (34.930) 37,934 (41.171)
   No 100,974 (60.792) 34,302 (64.739) 66,672 (58.943) 47,516 (64.246) 53,458 (58.020)
   Unknown 1,355 (0.816) 424 (0.800) 931 (0.823) 610 (0.825) 745 (0.809)
Chemotherapy <0.001 <0.001
   Yes 66,331 (39.935) 18,294 (34.527) 48,037 (42.469) 23,720 (32.071) 42,611 (46.247)
   No 99,766 (60.065) 34,691 (65.473) 65,075 (57.531) 50,240 (67.929) 49,526 (53.753)

Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± standard deviation. Group 1, no intrapulmonary metastases; solitary tumor in the ipsilateral lung; Group 2, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, different lobe; Group 3, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, same lobe; Group 4, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, same and different lobes. Hist, histological.

Table 2

Effect of the same lobe or different lobe of the same lung on the prognosis of lung cancer (univariate analysis)

Variable Statistics, n (%) Disease-specific survival Overall survival
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
Separate tumor nodules ipsilateral lung
   Group 1 134,567 (81.017) 1 1
   Group 2 10,947 (6.591) 1.611 (1.577–1.647) <0.001 1.731 (1.691–1.772) <0.001
   Group 3 13,017 (7.837) 1.294 (1.268–1.322) <0.001 1.344 (1.314–1.375) <0.001
   Group 4 7,566 (4.555) 1.871 (1.824–1.919) <0.001 2.047 (1.993–2.103) <0.001
Age
   Under 60 years old 25,664 (15.451) 1 1
   60–64 years 20,477 (12.328) 1.093 (1.068–1.119) <0.001 1.047 (1.021–1.073) <0.001
   65–69 years 27,348 (16.465) 1.094 (1.071–1.118) <0.001 1.016 (0.993–1.040) 0.18
   70–74 years 29,045 (17.487) 1.169 (1.145–1.194) <0.001 1.046 (1.022–1.070) <0.001
   75–79 years 27,141 (16.340) 1.341 (1.313–1.369) <0.001 1.170 (1.143–1.197) <0.001
   80+ years 36,422 (21.928) 1.824 (1.789–1.860) <0.001 1.549 (1.516–1.582) <0.001
Sex
   Female 82,022 (49.382) 1 1
   Male 84,075 (50.618) 1.318 (1.303–1.334) <0.001 1.298 (1.281–1.315) <0.001
Race
   White 130,472 (78.552) 1 1
   Black 15,384 (9.262) 1.072 (1.051–1.094) <0.001 1.084 (1.061–1.108) <0.001
   Asian or Pacific Islander 18,378 (11.065) 0.879 (0.862–0.896) <0.001 0.911 (0.892–0.931) <0.001
   Others 1,863 (1.122) 0.963 (0.909–1.020) 0.20 0.898 (0.841–0.958) 0.001
Histologic type
   Adenocarcinoma 79,995 (48.162) 1 1
   Squamous cell carcinoma 33,941 (20.434) 1.317 (1.297–1.337) <0.001 1.238 (1.217–1.260) <0.001
   Others 52,161 (31.404) 1.687 (1.665–1.710) <0.001 1.650 (1.626–1.674) <0.001
Grade
   Well differentiated; Grade I 9,401 (5.660) 1 1
   Moderately differentiated; Grade II 24,427 (14.706) 1.746 (1.686–1.809) <0.001 1.943 (1.860–2.028) <0.001
   Poorly differentiated; Grade III 30,241 (18.207) 3.012 (2.911–3.116) <0.001 3.671 (3.522–3.826) <0.001
   Undifferentiated; anaplastic; Grade IV 3,019 (1.818) 4.193 (3.990–4.406) <0.001 5.348 (5.054–5.658) <0.001
   Others 99,009 (59.609) 3.812 (3.690–3.938) <0.001 4.539 (4.361–4.724) <0.001
Surgery
   Surgery performed 43,362 (26.106) 1 1
   No surgery performed 122,303 (73.633) 4.851 (4.767–4.937) <0.001 5.863 (5.740–5.988) <0.001
   Unknown 432 (0.260) 2.660 (2.360–2.998) <0.001 3.088 (2.698–3.535) <0.001
Radiation
   Yes 63,768 (38.392) 1 1
   No 100,974 (60.792) 0.940 (0.929–0.951) <0.001 0.922 (0.910–0.935) <0.001
   Unknown 1,355 (0.816) 0.978 (0.916–1.043) 0.50 0.940 (0.874–1.011) 0.10
Chemotherapy
   Yes 66,331 (39.935) 1 1
   No 99,766 (60.065) 0.949 (0.938–0.960) <0.001 0.829 (0.818–0.840) <0.001

Group 1, no intrapulmonary metastases; solitary tumor in the ipsilateral lung; Group 2, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, different lobe; Group 3, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, same lobe; Group 4, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, same and different lobes. CI, confidence interval; Hist, histological.

Multivariate analysis (OS and DSS)

Table 3 presents the multivariate analysis of the tumor group variables (OS and DSS). Three covariate adjustment models were used: unadjusted and adjusted for age, sex, race, histological type, grade, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis, adjusted for eight covariates (age, sex, race, histological type, grade, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy), revealed that compared to a single tumor without metastasis, the mortality risk increased in the following scenarios: (I) multiple nodules in different lobes, 22.5% (OS) and 27.7% (DSS); (II) multiple nodules in the same lobe, 16.2% (OS) and 17.9% (DSS); and (III) multiple nodules across both the same and different lobes: 35.7% (OS) and 41.8% (DSS).

Table 3

Effect of the same lobe or different lobe of the same lung on the prognosis of lung cancer (multivariate analysis)

Exposure Non-adjusted Adjust I Adjust II
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
OS
   Group 1 1 1 1
   Group 2 1.611 (1.577–1.647) <0.001 1.619 (1.584–1.654) <0.001 1.225 (1.198–1.252) <0.001
   Group 3 1.294 (1.268–1.322) <0.001 1.306 (1.279–1.334) <0.001 1.162 (1.138–1.187) <0.001
   Group 4 1.871 (1.824–1.919) <0.001 1.943 (1.894–1.993) <0.001 1.357 (1.323–1.393) <0.001
Disease-specific survival
   Group 1 1 1 1
   Group 2 1.731 (1.691–1.772) <0.001 1.738 (1.698–1.779) <0.001 1.277 (1.247–1.307) <0.001
   Group 3 1.344 (1.314–1.375) <0.001 1.354 (1.323–1.385) <0.001 1.179 (1.153–1.207) <0.001
   Group 4 2.047 (1.993–2.103) <0.001 2.106 (2.050–2.163) <0.001 1.418 (1.380–1.458) <0.001

Group 1, no intrapulmonary metastases; solitary tumor in the ipsilateral lung; Group 2, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, different lobe; Group 3, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, same lobe; Group 4, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, same and different lobes. Outcome variable: OS and disease-specific survival. Exposure variable: separate tumor nodules ipsilateral lung. Non-adjusted model adjusts for: none; adjust I model adjusts for: age; sex; race; adjust II model adjust for: age; sex; race; histologic type; grade; surgery; radiation; chemotherapy. CI, confidence interval; Hist, histological; OS, overall survival.

Tables 4,5 present the stratified multivariate analysis (OS and DSS) of the “separate tumor nodule ipsilateral lung” variable. Tables 4,5 show that, relative to the single-tumor reference, the mixed group carried the highest mortality risk, followed by the multi-lobe and same-lobe groups: (I) male patients exhibited a higher mortality risk [39.3% (OS), 46.4% (DSS)] than female patients [32.2% (OS) 37.3% (DSS)]; (II) Patients who identified as white had a higher mortality risk [38.7% (OS), 45.3% (DSS)] than those who identified as black [31.0% (OS), 37.3% (DSS)] and those who identified as Asian or Pacific Islander [25.8% (OS), 33.7% (DSS)]; (III) patients with squamous cell lung cancer [58.1% (OS), 62.1% (DSS)] exhibited a higher mortality risk than patients with adenocarcinoma [34.5% (OS), 40.9% (DSS)]; (IV) patients with moderately differentiated lung cancer had the highest mortality risk [57.3% (OS), 65.0% (DSS)]; (V) patients who underwent surgery had a substantially higher mortality risk [137.9% (OS), 198.4% (DSS)] than those who did not undergo surgery [30.1% (OS), 35.8% (DSS)]. The mortality risk in patients who received radiotherapy [90.9% (OS), 98.2% (DSS)] was higher than that in those who did not receive radiotherapy [17.5% (OS), 22.0% (DSS)]. The mortality risk in patients with lung cancer who did not receive chemotherapy [51.7% (OS) and 64.0% (DSS)] was higher than that in those who did [19.4% (OS) and 21.9% (DSS)].

Table 4

Effect of the same lobe or different lobe of the same lung on the prognosis of lung cancer (multivariate analysis, stratification of ten covariates, OS)

Exposure Non-adjusted Adjust I Adjust II
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
Age
   Under 60 years
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.706 (1.610–1.808) <0.001 1.719 (1.622–1.822) <0.001 1.246 (1.175–1.321) <0.001
    Group 3 1.345 (1.272–1.422) <0.001 1.351 (1.278–1.429) <0.001 1.147 (1.084–1.213) <0.001
    Group 4 1.840 (1.729–1.957) <0.001 1.885 (1.771–2.006) <0.001 1.338 (1.256–1.425) <0.001
   60–64 years
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.712 (1.606–1.824) <0.001 1.730 (1.623–1.844) <0.001 1.299 (1.218–1.385) <0.001
    Group 3 1.286 (1.209–1.368) <0.001 1.275 (1.199–1.357) <0.001 1.160 (1.090–1.235) <0.001
    Group 4 1.960 (1.825–2.105) <0.001 2.055 (1.913–2.207) <0.001 1.413 (1.314–1.519) <0.001
   65–69 years
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.670 (1.580–1.766) <0.001 1.679 (1.589–1.776) <0.001 1.206 (1.140–1.275) <0.001
    Group 3 1.351 (1.283–1.422) <0.001 1.359 (1.291–1.431) <0.001 1.206 (1.146–1.271) <0.001
    Group 4 1.988 (1.860–2.124) <0.001 2.025 (1.895–2.164) <0.001 1.331 (1.244–1.424) <0.001
   70–74 years
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.620 (1.535–1.709) <0.001 1.646 (1.560–1.736) <0.001 1.208 (1.144–1.275) <0.001
    Group 3 1.312 (1.247–1.380) <0.001 1.324 (1.259–1.393) <0.001 1.164 (1.106–1.224) <0.001
    Group 4 2.036 (1.912–2.169) <0.001 2.087 (1.959–2.224) <0.001 1.412 (1.324–1.506) <0.001
   75–79 years
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.586 (1.503–1.672) <0.001 1.595 (1.512–1.682) <0.001 1.210 (1.146–1.277) <0.001
    Group 3 1.264 (1.200–1.331) <0.001 1.270 (1.205–1.337) <0.001 1.149 (1.091–1.211) <0.001
    Group 4 1.950 (1.829–2.079) <0.001 1.980 (1.857–2.111) <0.001 1.331 (1.247–1.421) <0.001
   80+ years
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.466 (1.405–1.530) <0.001 1.479 (1.417–1.544) <0.001 1.189 (1.139–1.242) <0.001
    Group 3 1.266 (1.215–1.320) <0.001 1.271 (1.219–1.325) <0.001 1.124 (1.078–1.173) <0.001
    Group 4 1.748 (1.659–1.841) <0.001 1.766 (1.677–1.861) <0.001 1.341 (1.272–1.413) <0.001
Sex
   Female
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.592 (1.542–1.643) <0.001 1.577 (1.527–1.628) <0.001 1.175 (1.137–1.213) <0.001
    Group 3 1.281 (1.243–1.321) <0.001 1.288 (1.249–1.328) <0.001 1.156 (1.121–1.192) <0.001
    Group 4 1.859 (1.792–1.929) <0.001 1.922 (1.852–1.994) <0.001 1.322 (1.274–1.373) <0.001
   Male
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.651 (1.603–1.701) <0.001 1.654 (1.606–1.704) <0.001 1.274 (1.236–1.312) <0.001
    Group 3 1.317 (1.280–1.355) <0.001 1.321 (1.283–1.359) <0.001 1.170 (1.137–1.204) <0.001
    Group 4 1.924 (1.858–1.993) <0.001 1.964 (1.896–2.034) <0.001 1.393 (1.344–1.444) <0.001
Race
   White
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.632 (1.593–1.673) <0.001 1.632 (1.593–1.673) <0.001 1.229 (1.199–1.260) <0.001
    Group 3 1.291 (1.261–1.322) <0.001 1.309 (1.278–1.340) <0.001 1.165 (1.138–1.193) <0.001
    Group 4 1.940 (1.884–1.998) <0.001 1.987 (1.929–2.046) <0.001 1.387 (1.346–1.429) <0.001
   Black
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.502 (1.403–1.609) <0.001 1.525 (1.425–1.633) <0.001 1.184 (1.105–1.268) <0.001
    Group 3 1.230 (1.149–1.317) <0.001 1.227 (1.146–1.314) <0.001 1.105 (1.031–1.183) 0.004
    Group 4 1.772 (1.635–1.920) <0.001 1.819 (1.679–1.971) <0.001 1.310 (1.207–1.422) <0.001
   Asian or Pacific Islander
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.575 (1.476–1.681) <0.001 1.591 (1.490–1.698) <0.001 1.224 (1.146–1.307) <0.001
    Group 3 1.338 (1.251–1.430) <0.001 1.332 (1.246–1.424) <0.001 1.167 (1.091–1.249) <0.001
    Group 4 1.687 (1.576–1.807) <0.001 1.798 (1.679–1.926) <0.001 1.258 (1.172–1.349) <0.001
   Others
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.859 (1.494–2.313) <0.001 1.911 (1.533–2.381) <0.001 1.388 (1.110–1.736) 0.004
    Group 3 1.661 (1.381–1.997) <0.001 1.559 (1.295–1.877) <0.001 1.340 (1.110–1.617) 0.002
    Group 4 2.416 (1.947–2.998) <0.001 2.404 (1.936–2.985) <0.001 1.778 (1.423–2.222) <0.001
Histologic type
   Adenocarcinoma
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.698 (1.645–1.753) <0.001 1.707 (1.654–1.762) <0.001 1.224 (1.186–1.264) <0.001
    Group 3 1.303 (1.263–1.345) <0.001 1.323 (1.282–1.365) <0.001 1.180 (1.143–1.218) <0.001
    Group 4 1.997 (1.929–2.067) <0.001 2.075 (2.004–2.148) <0.001 1.345 (1.298–1.393) <0.001
   Squamous cell carcinoma
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.713 (1.630–1.800) <0.001 1.695 (1.612–1.781) <0.001 1.254 (1.192–1.319) <0.001
    Group 3 1.381 (1.316–1.448) <0.001 1.356 (1.292–1.423) <0.001 1.151 (1.097–1.208) <0.001
    Group 4 2.363 (2.208–2.528) <0.001 2.360 (2.206–2.526) <0.001 1.581 (1.477–1.693) <0.001
   Others
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.535 (1.479–1.594) <0.001 1.535 (1.478–1.593) <0.001 1.218 (1.173–1.265) <0.001
    Group 3 1.249 (1.207–1.293) <0.001 1.263 (1.220–1.306) <0.001 1.152 (1.114–1.193) <0.001
    Group 4 1.791 (1.712–1.873) <0.001 1.810 (1.731–1.894) <0.001 1.339 (1.280–1.401) <0.001
Grade
   Well differentiated; Grade I
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 2.325 (2.055–2.632) <0.001 2.189 (1.934–2.478) <0.001 1.314 (1.155–1.494) <0.001
    Group 3 1.528 (1.363–1.713) <0.001 1.504 (1.341–1.687) <0.001 1.295 (1.154–1.454) <0.001
    Group 4 2.841 (2.447–3.298) <0.001 3.151 (2.712–3.661) <0.001 1.405 (1.199–1.646) <0.001
   Moderately differentiated; Grade II
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 2.125 (1.993–2.265) <0.001 2.114 (1.983–2.254) <0.001 1.393 (1.305–1.487) <0.001
    Group 3 1.387 (1.307–1.473) <0.001 1.416 (1.334–1.503) <0.001 1.239 (1.166–1.316) <0.001
    Group 4 2.749 (2.546–2.968) <0.001 2.899 (2.685–3.130) <0.001 1.573 (1.452–1.703) <0.001
   Poorly differentiated; Grade III
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.712 (1.634–1.794) <0.001 1.723 (1.644–1.806) <0.001 1.280 (1.220–1.342) <0.001
    Group 3 1.289 (1.232–1.349) <0.001 1.292 (1.235–1.352) <0.001 1.142 (1.091–1.195) <0.001
    Group 4 1.994 (1.876–2.119) <0.001 2.051 (1.930–2.180) <0.001 1.351 (1.270–1.438) <0.001
   Undifferentiated; anaplastic; Grade IV
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.522 (1.315–1.762) <0.001 1.494 (1.290–1.729) <0.001 1.221 (1.053–1.415) 0.008
    Group 3 1.226 (1.075–1.398) 0.002 1.185 (1.038–1.352) 0.01 1.062 (0.930–1.213) 0.37
    Group 4 1.778 (1.469–2.152) <0.001 1.709 (1.412–2.070) <0.001 1.364 (1.125–1.655) 0.002
   Others
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.352 (1.315–1.390) <0.001 1.370 (1.332–1.408) <0.001 1.181 (1.149–1.215) <0.001
    Group 3 1.207 (1.175–1.240) <0.001 1.223 (1.191–1.256) <0.001 1.152 (1.122–1.183) <0.001
    Group 4 1.531 (1.484–1.579) <0.001 1.597 (1.548–1.647) <0.001 1.335 (1.294–1.378) <0.001
Surgery
   Surgery performed
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.733 (1.594–1.885) <0.001 1.785 (1.642–1.941) <0.001 1.716 (1.578–1.867) <0.001
    Group 3 1.384 (1.305–1.469) <0.001 1.418 (1.337–1.505) <0.001 1.379 (1.299–1.464) <0.001
    Group 4 2.207 (1.935–2.518) <0.001 2.452 (2.149–2.798) <0.001 2.379 (2.083–2.716) <0.001
   No surgery performed
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.223 (1.196–1.251) <0.001 1.244 (1.216–1.273) <0.001 1.181 (1.154–1.208) <0.001
    Group 3 1.144 (1.119–1.170) <0.001 1.155 (1.130–1.182) <0.001 1.123 (1.098–1.148) <0.001
    Group 4 1.326 (1.292–1.361) <0.001 1.386 (1.350–1.422) <0.001 1.301 (1.267–1.336) <0.001
   Unknown
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.054 (0.603–1.844) 0.85 1.056 (0.599–1.860) 0.85 1.131 (0.634–2.017) 0.68
    Group 3 1.097 (0.720–1.672) 0.67 1.002 (0.655–1.535) 0.99 1.054 (0.679–1.635) 0.82
    Group 4 3.829 (1.571–9.332) 0.003 4.265 (1.713–10.623) 0.002 4.125 (1.638–10.389) 0.003
Radiation
   Yes
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.491 (1.439–1.546) <0.001 1.516 (1.462–1.571) <0.001 1.484 (1.431–1.538) <0.001
    Group 3 1.280 (1.239–1.323) <0.001 1.290 (1.248–1.333) <0.001 1.290 (1.248–1.333) <0.001
    Group 4 1.881 (1.800–1.966) <0.001 1.945 (1.861–2.034) <0.001 1.909 (1.826–1.997) <0.001
   No
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.668 (1.623–1.715) <0.001 1.614 (1.571–1.660) <0.001 1.089 (1.059–1.120) <0.001
    Group 3 1.303 (1.268–1.339) <0.001 1.286 (1.252–1.322) <0.001 1.065 (1.037–1.095) <0.001
    Group 4 1.858 (1.801–1.917) <0.001 1.869 (1.811–1.929) <0.001 1.175 (1.138–1.213) <0.001
   Unknown
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.409 (1.113–1.785) 0.004 1.427 (1.124–1.810) 0.003 1.231 (0.966–1.567) 0.09
    Group 3 1.155 (0.918–1.453) 0.22 1.174 (0.932–1.479) 0.17 1.143 (0.906–1.442) 0.26
    Group 4 1.443 (1.013–2.057) 0.04 1.433 (1.003–2.047) 0.048 1.328 (0.925–1.908) 0.12
Chemotherapy
   Yes
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.257 (1.218–1.297) <0.001 1.257 (1.218–1.298) <0.001 1.121 (1.086–1.157) <0.001
    Group 3 1.097 (1.065–1.131) <0.001 1.096 (1.064–1.130) <0.001 1.070 (1.038–1.103) <0.001
    Group 4 1.365 (1.317–1.415) <0.001 1.407 (1.357–1.459) <0.001 1.194 (1.151–1.239) <0.001
   No
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.960 (1.902–2.020) <0.001 1.899 (1.843–1.957) <0.001 1.284 (1.246–1.324) <0.001
    Group 3 1.456 (1.415–1.499) <0.001 1.441 (1.400–1.483) <0.001 1.204 (1.169–1.239) <0.001
    Group 4 2.555 (2.465–2.649) <0.001 2.515 (2.426–2.607) <0.001 1.517 (1.462–1.573) <0.001

Group 1, no intrapulmonary metastases; solitary tumor in the ipsilateral lung; Group 2, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, different lobe; Group 3, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, same lobe; Group 4, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, same and different lobes. Outcome variable: vital status. Exposure variable: separate tumor nodules ipsilateral lung. Non-adjusted model adjusts for: none. Adjust I model adjusts for: age; sex; race. Adjust II model adjusts for: age; sex; race; histologic type; grade; surgery; radiation; chemotherapy. CI, confidence interval; Hist, histological; OS, overall survival.

Table 5

Effect of the same lobe or different lobe of the same lung on the prognosis of lung cancer (multivariate analysis, stratification of ten covariates, DSS)

Exposure Non-adjusted Adjust I Adjust II
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
Age
   Under 60 years
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.763 (1.659–1.873) <0.001 1.775 (1.671–1.887) <0.001 1.262 (1.187–1.341) <0.001
    Group 3 1.376 (1.298–1.460) <0.001 1.383 (1.304–1.467) <0.001 1.156 (1.090–1.226) <0.001
    Group 4 1.930 (1.809–2.058) <0.001 1.975 (1.851–2.107) <0.001 1.372 (1.285–1.465) <0.001
   60–64 years
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.772 (1.656–1.896) <0.001 1.789 (1.672–1.915) <0.001 1.309 (1.222–1.402) <0.001
    Group 3 1.334 (1.249–1.426) <0.001 1.323 (1.239–1.414) <0.001 1.179 (1.103–1.260) <0.001
    Group 4 2.097 (1.946–2.259) <0.001 2.196 (2.038–2.366) <0.001 1.463 (1.356–1.579) <0.001
   65–69 years
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.775 (1.672–1.883) <0.001 1.783 (1.680–1.892) <0.001 1.241 (1.169–1.318) <0.001
    Group 3 1.398 (1.322–1.478) <0.001 1.404 (1.328–1.485) <0.001 1.219 (1.152–1.289) <0.001
    Group 4 2.172 (2.026–2.329) <0.001 2.207 (2.058–2.366) <0.001 1.381 (1.286–1.483) <0.001
   70–74 years
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.763 (1.664–1.867) <0.001 1.788 (1.688–1.894) <0.001 1.271 (1.199–1.347) <0.001
    Group 3 1.371 (1.297–1.449) <0.001 1.383 (1.308–1.462) <0.001 1.185 (1.121–1.253) <0.001
    Group 4 2.215 (2.071–2.370) <0.001 2.265 (2.116–2.423) <0.001 1.466 (1.368–1.570) <0.001
   75–79 years
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.736 (1.638–1.839) <0.001 1.743 (1.645–1.846) <0.001 1.275 (1.203–1.352) <0.001
    Group 3 1.324 (1.250–1.403) <0.001 1.329 (1.255–1.408) <0.001 1.172 (1.106–1.242) <0.001
    Group 4 2.127 (1.985–2.279) <0.001 2.155 (2.011–2.309) <0.001 1.387 (1.293–1.489) <0.001
   80+ years
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.609 (1.536–1.686) <0.001 1.620 (1.546–1.698) <0.001 1.269 (1.211–1.331) <0.001
    Group 3 1.301 (1.242–1.364) <0.001 1.305 (1.245–1.367) <0.001 1.132 (1.080–1.187) <0.001
    Group 4 1.950 (1.844–2.062) <0.001 1.963 (1.856–2.076) <0.001 1.446 (1.366–1.530) <0.001
Sex
   Female
     Group 1 1 1 1
     Group 2 1.702 (1.645–1.761) <0.001 1.690 (1.633–1.749) <0.001 1.222 (1.180–1.265) <0.001
     Group 3 1.330 (1.286–1.375) <0.001 1.336 (1.292–1.381) <0.001 1.173 (1.134–1.213) <0.001
     Group 4 2.018 (1.941–2.098) <0.001 2.070 (1.990–2.152) <0.001 1.373 (1.319–1.429) <0.001
   Male
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.777 (1.721–1.835) <0.001 1.777 (1.722–1.835) <0.001 1.329 (1.286–1.372) <0.001
    Group 3 1.366 (1.324–1.410) <0.001 1.368 (1.326–1.412) <0.001 1.187 (1.150–1.224) <0.001
    Group 4 2.116 (2.038–2.196) <0.001 2.140 (2.062–2.221) <0.001 1.464 (1.409–1.520) <0.001
Race
   White
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.755 (1.709–1.802) <0.001 1.757 (1.711–1.804) <0.001 1.281 (1.247–1.316) <0.001
    Group 3 1.348 (1.314–1.383) <0.001 1.362 (1.328–1.398) <0.001 1.187 (1.156–1.217) <0.001
    Group 4 2.127 (2.062–2.194) <0.001 2.164 (2.098–2.233) <0.001 1.453 (1.408–1.500) <0.001
   Black
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.618 (1.505–1.741) <0.001 1.638 (1.523–1.762) <0.001 1.249 (1.160–1.345) <0.001
    Group 3 1.263 (1.173–1.361) <0.001 1.260 (1.169–1.358) <0.001 1.113 (1.033–1.200) 0.005
    Group 4 1.923 (1.766–2.094) <0.001 1.956 (1.796–2.130) <0.001 1.373 (1.259–1.498) <0.001
   Asian or Pacific Islander
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.669 (1.557–1.789) <0.001 1.684 (1.571–1.806) <0.001 1.268 (1.181–1.360) <0.001
    Group 3 1.364 (1.268–1.467) <0.001 1.358 (1.263–1.461) <0.001 1.175 (1.092–1.264) <0.001
    Group 4 1.856 (1.728–1.995) <0.001 1.961 (1.825–2.107) <0.001 1.337 (1.242–1.439) <0.001
   Others
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.955 (1.535–2.492) <0.001 2.020 (1.583–2.577) <0.001 1.418 (1.107–1.818) 0.006
    Group 3 1.584 (1.278–1.964) <0.001 1.493 (1.202–1.853) <0.001 1.234 (0.991–1.536) 0.06
    Group 4 2.095 (1.614–2.720) <0.001 2.089 (1.608–2.715) <0.001 1.468 (1.122–1.919) 0.005
Histologic type
   Adenocarcinoma
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.829 (1.769–1.892) <0.001 1.838 (1.777–1.902) <0.001 1.277 (1.234–1.322) <0.001
    Group 3 1.352 (1.306–1.399) <0.001 1.369 (1.323–1.417) <0.001 1.197 (1.157–1.239) <0.001
    Group 4 2.196 (2.118–2.278) <0.001 2.259 (2.177–2.343) <0.001 1.409 (1.358–1.463) <0.001
   Squamous cell carcinoma
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.861 (1.763–1.963) <0.001 1.843 (1.746–1.945) <0.001 1.302 (1.233–1.375) <0.001
    Group 3 1.427 (1.353–1.505) <0.001 1.404 (1.331–1.481) <0.001 1.157 (1.097–1.221) <0.001
    Group 4 2.556 (2.377–2.748) <0.001 2.540 (2.362–2.732) <0.001 1.621 (1.506–1.744) <0.001
   Others
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.619 (1.555–1.686) <0.001 1.619 (1.555–1.686) <0.001 1.268 (1.217–1.320) <0.001
    Group 3 1.292 (1.245–1.341) <0.001 1.303 (1.255–1.352) <0.001 1.171 (1.128–1.215) <0.001
    Group 4 1.919 (1.829–2.014) <0.001 1.935 (1.844–2.031) <0.001 1.408 (1.341–1.478) <0.001
Grade
   Well differentiated; Grade I
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 2.868 (2.493–3.299) <0.001 2.726 (2.369–3.138) <0.001 1.423 (1.229–1.647) <0.001
    Group 3 1.701 (1.484–1.951) <0.001 1.686 (1.470–1.933) <0.001 1.371 (1.193–1.575) <0.001
    Group 4 3.800 (3.233–4.467) <0.001 4.181 (3.555–4.919) <0.001 1.562 (1.314–1.857) <0.001
   Moderately differentiated; Grade II
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 2.500 (2.334–2.679) <0.001 2.487 (2.321–2.665) <0.001 1.518 (1.414–1.629) <0.001
    Group 3 1.511 (1.412–1.617) <0.001 1.537 (1.436–1.644) <0.001 1.279 (1.194–1.369) <0.001
    Group 4 3.279 (3.022–3.558) <0.001 3.409 (3.141–3.699) <0.001 1.650 (1.516–1.796) <0.001
  Poorly differentiated; Grade III
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.853 (1.763–1.947) <0.001 1.862 (1.771–1.957) <0.001 1.333 (1.267–1.402) <0.001
    Group 3 1.354 (1.289–1.422) <0.001 1.355 (1.290–1.423) <0.001 1.170 (1.113–1.229) <0.001
    Group 4 2.144 (2.010–2.286) <0.001 2.186 (2.050–2.331) <0.001 1.372 (1.285–1.464) <0.001
   Undifferentiated; anaplastic; Grade IV
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.552 (1.330–1.811) <0.001 1.526 (1.307–1.781) <0.001 1.239 (1.060–1.449) 0.007
    Group 3 1.263 (1.099–1.450) <0.001 1.223 (1.064–1.406) 0.005 1.082 (0.941–1.244) 0.27
    Group 4 1.788 (1.461–2.188) <0.001 1.725 (1.408–2.112) <0.001 1.361 (1.109–1.670) 0.003
   Others
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.424 (1.382–1.467) <0.001 1.440 (1.397–1.483) <0.001 1.222 (1.185–1.259) <0.001
    Group 3 1.235 (1.200–1.272) <0.001 1.248 (1.212–1.285) <0.001 1.161 (1.128–1.196) <0.001
    Group 4 1.659 (1.605–1.714) <0.001 1.713 (1.658–1.771) <0.001 1.400 (1.354–1.448) <0.001
Surgery
   Surgery performed
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 2.183 (1.989–2.396) <0.001 2.253 (2.053–2.473) <0.001 2.047 (1.864–2.248) <0.001
    Group 3 1.542 (1.437–1.654) <0.001 1.579 (1.472–1.694) <0.001 1.455 (1.356–1.562) <0.001
    Group 4 3.041 (2.645–3.495) <0.001 3.350 (2.914–3.851) <0.001 2.984 (2.593–3.434) <0.001
   No surgery performed
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.291 (1.261–1.323) <0.001 1.308 (1.277–1.340) <0.001 1.225 (1.196–1.256) <0.001
    Group 3 1.176 (1.148–1.204) <0.001 1.183 (1.155–1.212) <0.001 1.138 (1.111–1.166) <0.001
    Group 4 1.426 (1.387–1.465) <0.001 1.471 (1.431–1.512) <0.001 1.358 (1.320–1.396) <0.001
   Unknown
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.141 (0.620–2.100) 0.67 1.141 (0.615–2.117) 0.67 1.278 (0.679–2.407) 0.45
    Group 3 1.229 (0.781–1.934) 0.37 1.123 (0.710–1.776) 0.62 1.201 (0.749–1.926) 0.45
    Group 4 3.881 (1.433–10.509) 0.008 4.570 (1.645–12.698) 0.004 4.753 (1.688–13.384) 0.003
Radiation
   Yes
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.613 (1.553–1.676) <0.001 1.621 (1.561–1.684) <0.001 1.559 (1.500–1.619) <0.001
    Group 3 1.342 (1.296–1.390) <0.001 1.338 (1.292–1.386) <0.001 1.317 (1.271–1.364) <0.001
    Group 4 2.060 (1.967–2.157) <0.001 2.070 (1.976–2.168) <0.001 1.982 (1.892–2.077) <0.001
   No
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.791 (1.739–1.845) <0.001 1.739 (1.688–1.792) <0.001 1.122 (1.089–1.156) <0.001
    Group 3 1.345 (1.305–1.386) <0.001 1.329 (1.290–1.370) <0.001 1.070 (1.038–1.102) <0.001
    Group 4 2.038 (1.971–2.107) <0.001 2.046 (1.979–2.116) <0.001 1.220 (1.179–1.262) <0.001
   Unknown
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.557 (1.209–2.006) <0.001 1.589 (1.231–2.051) <0.001 1.357 (1.047–1.759) 0.02
    Group 3 1.194 (0.925–1.540) 0.17 1.207 (0.934–1.559) 0.15 1.146 (0.885–1.484) 0.30
    Group 4 1.690 (1.171–2.440) 0.005 1.655 (1.143–2.396) 0.008 1.479 (1.015–2.154) 0.04
Chemotherapy
   Yes
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 1.279 (1.237–1.322) <0.001 1.281 (1.239–1.325) <0.001 1.135 (1.098–1.174) <0.001
    Group 3 1.096 (1.061–1.132) <0.001 1.096 (1.061–1.132) <0.001 1.067 (1.033–1.102) <0.001
    Group 4 1.411 (1.359–1.465) <0.001 1.451 (1.397–1.506) <0.001 1.219 (1.173–1.266) <0.001
   No
    Group 1 1 1 1
    Group 2 2.154 (2.084–2.225) <0.001 2.096 (2.028–2.166) <0.001 1.375 (1.331–1.422) <0.001
    Group 3 1.532 (1.483–1.582) <0.001 1.518 (1.469–1.568) <0.001 1.243 (1.203–1.284) <0.001
    Group 4 2.842 (2.734–2.954) <0.001 2.796 (2.690–2.907) <0.001 1.640 (1.577–1.705) <0.001

Group 1, no intrapulmonary metastases; solitary tumor in the ipsilateral lung; Group 2, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, different lobe; Group 3, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, same lobe; Group 4, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, same and different lobes. Outcome variable: vital status. Exposure variable: separate tumor nodules ipsilateral lung. Non-adjusted model adjusts for: none. Adjust I model adjusts for: age; sex; race. Adjust II model adjusts for: age; sex; race; histologist type; grade; surgery; radiation; chemotherapy. CI, confidence interval; Hist, histological; DSS, disease-specific survival.

Survival rates

Table 6 presents the 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS and DSS rates of patients with lung cancer. For the single-tumor group, the OS and DSS rates at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 years were 56% and 62%, 43% and 49%, 35% and 43%, 27% and 36%, and 16% and 28%, respectively. For the multi-lobe group, the 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS and DSS rates were 39% and 44%, 25% and 29%, 18% and 22%, 12% and 16%, and 5% and 9%, respectively. For patients with separated nodules of the same histological type present in the same lobe of the lung on the same side, the OS and DSS rates were 47% and 53%, 33% and 38%, 25% and 31%, 17% and 23%, and 9% and 17%, respectively. In the mixed group, the OS and DSS rates were 34% and 38%, 20% and 24%, 14% and 17%, 7% and 10%, and 3% and 5%, respectively. For female patients with lung cancer, the OS and DSS rates at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 years were 59% and 63%, 45% and 51%, 35% and 44%, 29% and 37%, and 17% and 29%, respectively. For male patients with lung cancer, the 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS and DSS rates were 49% and 54%, 35% and 41%, 27% and 34%, 19% and 28%, and 11% and 21%, respectively. The OS and DSS rates at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 years for each category of the other variables are detailed in Table 6.

Table 6

Basic characteristics of patients and survival analysis according to different factors (OS and DSS)

Type Variable No. of patients Percentage of total patients (%) 1-year 2-year 3-year 5-year 10-year
Survival rate (%) Probability density Survival rate (%) Probability density Survival rate (%) Probability density Survival rate (%) Probability density Survival rate (%) Probability density
OS Total 166,097 100 54 0.017 40 0.008 32 0.005 24 0.002 14 0.002
Separate tumor nodules ipsilateral lung
   Group 1 134,567 81.0 56 0.017 43 0.008 35 0.005 27 0.003 16 0.002
   Group 2 10,947 6.6 39 0.018 25 0.009 18 0.005 12 0.002 5 <0.001
   Group 3 13,017 7.8 47 0.020 33 0.009 25 0.006 17 0.002 9 <0.001
   Group 4 7,566 4.6 34 0.018 20 0.009 14 0.005 7 0.002 3 <0.001
Age
   Under 60 years old 25,664 15.5 60 0.019 46 0.007 39 0.005 32 0.002 24 <0.001
   60–64 years 20,477 12.3 58 0.017 44 0.009 37 0.005 29 0.002 20 <0.001
   65–69 years 27,348 16.5 58 0.016 45 0.008 37 0.006 29 0.003 18 <0.001
   70–74 years 29,045 17.5 57 0.017 43 0.001 35 0.006 26 0.003 14 <0.001
   75–79 years 27,141 16.3 52 0.017 38 0.009 31 0.006 21 0.002 10 <0.001
   80+ years 36,422 21.9 41 0.016 28 0.007 21 0.004 12 0.002 3 <0.001
Sex
   Female 82,022 49.4 59 0.016 45 0.008 35 0.005 29 0.003 17 0.004
   Male 84,075 50.6 49 0.018 35 0.008 27 0.005 19 0.002 11 <0.001
Race
   White 130,472 78.6 53 0.017 40 0.008 32 0.005 24 0.002 13 <0.001
   Black 15,384 9.3 51 0.018 36 0.010 29 0.006 21 0.002 13 <0.001
   Asian or Pacific Islander 18,378 11.1 59 0.016 45 0.008 37 0.005 27 0.003 17 <0.001
   Others 1,863 1.1 54 0.026 41 0.007 33 0.008 25 <0.001 15 <0.001
Histologic type
   Adenocarcinoma 79,995 48.2 62 0.015 48 0.008 40 0.005 31 0.003 19 0.003
   Squamous cell carcinoma 33,941 20.4 53 0.019 38 0.009 29 0.006 20 0.002 10 <0.001
   Others 52,161 31.4 41 0.019 28 0.007 22 0.004 16 0.002 9 <0.001
Grade
   Well differentiated; Grade I 9,401 5.7 86 0.010 77 0.007 71 0.005 60 0.004 40 0.023
   Moderately differentiated; Grade II 24,427 14.7 74 0.013 61 0.008 52 0.006 40 0.003 24 <0.001
   Poorly differentiated; Grade III 30,241 18.2 52 0.019 38 0.008 31 0.005 23 0.002 13 <0.001
   Undifferentiated; anaplastic; Grade IV 3,019 1.8 40 0.023 24 0.007 18 0.005 13 0.002 8 <0.001
   Others 99,009 59.6 46 0.018 31 0.009 23 0.005 14 0.002 7 <0.001
Surgery
   Surgery performed 43,362 26.1 89 0.008 80 0.007 73 0.006 60 0.004 39 0.006
   No surgery performed 122,303 73.6 41 0.020 25 0.009 18 0.005 11 0.002 4 <0.001
   Unknown 432 0.3 64 0.019 47 0.022 36 0.007 26 <0.001 7 <0.001
Radiation
   Yes 63,768 38.4 56 0.023 38 0.010 28 0.007 18 0.002 7 <0.001
   No 100,974 60.8 52 0.014 41 0.007 35 0.004 28 0.003 17 0.003
   Unknown 1,355 0.8 55 0.016 39 0.005 29 0.009 20 <0.001 10 <0.001
Chemotherapy
   Yes 66,331 39.9 56 0.026 36 0.011 27 0.006 18 0.002 9 <0.001
   No 99,766 60.1 52 0.011 43 0.007 36 0.004 28 0.003 17 0.003
DSS Total 166,097 100 59 0.016 46 0.007 39 0.004 32 0.002 25 <0.001
Separate tumor nodules ipsilateral lung
   Group 1 134,567 81.0 62 0.015 49 0.007 43 0.004 36 0.002 28 <0.001
   Group 2 10,947 6.6 44 0.018 29 0.009 22 0.005 16 0.002 9 <0.001
   Group 3 13,017 7.8 53 0.019 38 0.009 31 0.005 23 0.002 17 <0.001
   Group 4 7,566 4.6 38 0.018 24 0.009 17 0.005 10 0.002 5 <0.001
Age
   Under 60 years old 25,664 15.5 63 0.018 50 0.007 43 0.004 36 0.002 31 <0.001
   60–64 years 20,477 12.3 62 0.016 49 0.009 42 0.004 35 0.002 28 <0.001
   65–69 years 27,348 16.5 63 0.015 50 0.007 44 0.005 37 0.002 28 <0.001
   70–74 years 29,045 17.5 62 0.015 49 0.008 43 0.005 36 0.002 27 <0.001
   75–79 years 27,141 16.3 58 0.016 46 0.008 39 0.005 31 0.002 22 <0.001
   80+ years 36,422 21.9 48 0.015 36 0.007 30 0.004 23 0.002 15 <0.001
Sex
   Female 82,022 49.4 63 0.015 51 0.007 44 0.004 37 0.002 29 <0.001
   Male 84,075 50.6 54 0.017 41 0.008 34 0.005 28 0.002 21 <0.001
Race
   White 130,472 78.6 58 0.016 46 0.007 39 0.004 33 0.002 25 <0.001
   Black 15,384 9.3 56 0.017 42 0.009 36 0.005 29 0.001 22 <0.001
   Asian or Pacific Islander 18,378 11.1 63 0.014 51 0.007 43 0.005 33 0.003 26 <0.001
   Others 1,863 1.1 62 0.024 50 0.006 43 0.007 36 <0.001 26 <0.001
Histologic type
   Adenocarcinoma 79,995 48.2 66 0.013 54 0.007 47 0.005 39 0.003 30 <0.001
   Squamous cell carcinoma 33,941 20.4 59 0.017 45 0.008 38 0.006 31 0.002 23 <0.001
   Others 52,161 31.4 47 0.019 34 0.007 29 0.004 24 0.002 18 <0.001
Grade
   Well differentiated; Grade I 9,401 5.7 89 0.007 83 0.005 78 0.003 71 0.002 62 <0.001
   Moderately differentiated; Grade II 24,427 14.7 78 0.011 68 0.007 60 0.005 51 0.003 40 <0.001
   Poorly differentiated; Grade III 30,241 18.2 57 0.018 43 0.008 37 0.005 30 0.002 23 <0.001
   Undifferentiated; anaplastic; Grade IV 3,019 1.8 44 0.023 28 0.008 22 0.005 17 0.001 13 <0.001
   Others 99,009 59.6 51 0.018 37 0.009 29 0.005 22 0.002 15 <0.001
Surgery
   Surgery performed 43,362 26.1 92 0.006 85 0.005 80 0.004 71 0.003 59 <0.001
   No surgery performed 122,303 73.6 46 0.020 31 0.009 24 0.005 17 0.002 10 <0.001
   Unknown 432 0.3 70 0.012 54 0.022 44 0.008 34 <0.001 15 <0.001
Radiation
   Yes 63,768 38.4 60 0.021 43 0.010 34 0.006 26 0.003 16 <0.001
   No 100,974 60.8 58 0.013 48 0.006 43 0.006 37 0.002 30 <0.001
   Unknown 1,355 0.8 61 0.012 46 0.003 37 0.006 29 <0.001 21 <0.001
Chemotherapy
   Yes 66,331 39.9 59 0.025 40 0.011 31 0.006 22 0.002 15 <0.001
   No 99,766 60.1 59 0.009 51 0.005 46 0.003 40 0.002 33 <0.001

Group 1, no intrapulmonary metastases; solitary tumor in the ipsilateral lung; Group 2, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, different lobe; Group 3, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, same lobe; Group 4, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, same and different lobes. DSS, disease-specific survival; Hist, histological; OS, overall survival.

Mean and median survival time

Table 7 presents the mean and median survival times of patients with lung cancer. The single-tumor group showed a mean OS/DSS of 38.988/49.720 months and a median OS/DSS of 17.000/24.000 months. The multi-lobe group showed a mean OS/DSS of 21.572/26.677 months and a median OS/DSS of 8.000/10.000 months. The same-lobe group showed a mean OS/DSS of 28.726/36.366 months and a median OS/DSS of 11.000/14.000 months. The mixed group showed a mean OS/DSS of 16.975/20.288 months and a median OS/DSS of 6.000/7.000 months. The median OS and median DSS of patients with lung cancer aged 65–69 years were longer than those of patients aged 60–64 years. The mean DSS and median DSS of patients with lung cancer aged 65–69 years was longer than that of patients aged 60–64 years. The mean OS and mean DSS of female patients with lung cancer were 41.300 and 50.907 months, respectively, whereas the median OS and median DSS were 20.000 and 26.000 months, respectively. The mean OS and mean DSS of male patients with lung cancer were 30.829 and 40.653 months, respectively, whereas the median OS and median DSS were 12.000 and 16.000 months, respectively. The mean OS and mean DSS of patients with lung adenocarcinoma were 43.967 and 53.060 months, respectively, whereas the median OS and median DSS were 23.000 and 31.000 months, respectively. The mean OS and mean DSS for patients with squamous cell carcinoma were 32.318 and 44.027 months, respectively, whereas the median OS and median DSS were 14.000 and 19.000 months, respectively.

Table 7

The average and median survival time of lung cancer patients (OS and DSS)

Type Variable No. of patients Percentage
of total patients (%)
Average survival analysis Median survival analysis
Survival time (months) 95% confidence interval Standard error Survival rate (%) 95% confidence interval Standard error
Lower limit Upper limit Lower limit Upper limit
OS Total 166,097 100 35.979 35.743 36.216 0.121 15.000 14.817 15.183 0.093
Separate tumor nodules ipsilateral lung
   Group 1 134,567 81.0 38.988 38.716 39.259 0.139 17.000 16.755 17.245 0.125
   Group 2 10,947 6.6 21.572 20.892 22.251 0.347 8.000 7.665 8.335 0.171
   Group 3 13,017 7.8 28.726 27.990 29.461 0.375 11.000 10.599 11.401 0.205
   Group 4 7,566 4.6 16.975 16.283 17.666 0.353 6.000 5.656 6.344 0.176
Age
   Under 60 years old 25,664 15.5 45.424 44.766 46.083 0.336 20.000 19.353 20.647 0.330
   60–64 years 20,477 12.3 41.657 40.937 42.377 0.367 18.000 17.348 18.652 0.333
   65–69 years 27,348 16.5 41.346 40.731 41.962 0.314 19.000 18.415 19.585 0.299
   70–74 years 29,045 17.5 38.348 37.767 38.929 0.296 18.000 17.485 18.515 0.263
   75–79 years 27,141 16.3 33.036 32.482 33.590 0.283 14.000 13.577 14.423 0.216
   80+ years 36,422 21.9 22.392 22.021 22.764 0.189 8.000 7.780 8.220 0.112
Sex
   Female 82,022 49.4 41.300 40.944 41.655 0.181 20.000 19.648 20.352 0.179
   Male 84,075 50.6 30.829 30.521 31.137 0.157 12.000 11.817 12.183 0.093
Race
   White 130,472 78.6 35.721 35.456 35.986 0.135 15.000 14.792 15.208 0.106
   Black 15,384 9.3 33.064 32.310 33.817 0.384 13.000 12.542 13.458 0.234
   Asian or Pacific Islander 18,378 11.1 40.217 39.461 40.972 0.385 19.000 18.293 19.707 0.361
   Others 1,863 1.1 37.491 35.091 39.892 1.225 15.000 13.439 16.561 0.796
Histologic type
   Adenocarcinoma 79,995 48.2 43.967 43.602 44.333 0.186 23.000 22.580 23.420 0.214
   Squamous cell carcinoma 33,941 20.4 32.318 31.842 32.795 0.243 14.000 13.657 14.343 0.175
   Others 52,161 31.4 26.102 25.728 26.476 0.191 9.000 8.831 9.169 0.086
   Well differentiated; Grade I 9,401 5.7 75.502 74.482 76.523 0.520 92.000 87.781 96.219 2.153
   Moderately differentiated; Grade II 24,427 14.7 54.580 53.950 55.209 0.321 40.000 38.835 41.165 0.594
   Poorly differentiated; Grade III 30,241 18.2 34.382 33.886 34.879 0.253 14.000 13.641 14.359 0.183
   Undifferentiated; anaplastic; Grade IV 3,019 1.8 23.258 21.971 24.545 0.657 9.000 8.459 9.541 0.276
   Others 99,009 59.6 26.092 25.805 26.378 0.146 11.000 10.853 11.147 0.075
Surgery
   Surgery performed 43,362 26.1 75.879 75.374 76.384 0.258 87.000 85.167 88.833 0.935
   No surgery performed 122,303 73.6 21.391 21.187 21.594 0.104 9.000 8.896 9.104 0.053
   Unknown 432 0.3 39.723 35.224 44.223 2.296 22.000 18.843 25.157 1.611
Radiation
   Yes 63,768 38.4 31.021 30.687 31.355 0.170 15.000 14.770 15.230 0.118
   No 100,974 60.8 38.925 38.605 39.245 0.163 14.000 13.710 14.290 0.148
   Unknown 1,355 0.8 32.988 30.503 35.472 1.268 15.000 13.202 16.798 0.918
Chemotherapy
   Yes 66,331 39.9 31.498 31.169 31.826 0.168 15.000 14.803 15.197 0.101
   No 99,766 60.1 39.111 38.786 39.435 0.166 15.000 14.660 15.340 0.173
DSS Total 166,097 100 45.779 45.495 46.063 0.145 20.000 19.718 20.282 0.144
   Separate tumor nodules ipsilateral lung
    Group 1 134,567 81.0 49.720 49.397 50.043 0.165 24.000 23.577 24.423 0.216
    Group 2 10,947 6.6 26.677 25.817 27.537 0.439 10.000 9.593 10.407 0.208
    Group 3 13,017 7.8 36.366 35.449 37.283 0.468 14.000 13.427 14.573 0.292
    Group 4 7,566 4.6 20.288 19.418 21.158 0.444 7.000 6.605 7.395 0.201
Age
   Under 60 years old 25,664 15.5 50.821 50.115 51.527 0.360 24.000 23.114 24.886 0.452
   60–64 years 20,477 12.3 48.987 48.184 49.790 0.410 23.000 22.070 23.930 0.475
   65–69 years 27,348 16.5 50.097 49.394 50.801 0.359 25.000 24.022 25.978 0.499
   70–74 years 29,045 17.5 49.029 48.331 49.727 0.356 24.000 23.139 24.861 0.439
   75–79 years 27,141 16.3 44.464 43.751 45.178 0.364 20.000 19.289 20.711 0.363
   80+ years 36,422 21.9 34.222 33.634 34.810 0.300 12.000 11.645 12.355 0.181
Sex
   Female 82,022 49.4 50.907 50.496 51.318 0.210 26.000 25.400 26.600 0.306
   Male 84,075 50.6 40.653 40.264 41.042 0.199 16.000 15.717 16.283 0.144
Race
   White 130,472 78.6 45.862 45.542 46.182 0.163 20.000 19.677 20.323 0.165
   Black 15,384 9.3 41.980 41.066 42.894 0.466 17.000 16.327 17.673 0.343
   Asian or Pacific Islander 18,378 11.1 47.942 47.081 48.803 0.439 25.000 23.924 26.076 0.549
   Others 1,863 1.1 49.832 46.884 52.779 1.504 24.000 20.181 27.819 1.948
Histologic type
   Adenocarcinoma 79,995 48.2 53.060 52.647 53.474 0.211 31.000 30.322 31.678 0.346
   Squamous cell carcinoma 33,941 20.4 44.027 43.402 44.653 0.319 19.000 18.450 19.550 0.280
   Others 52,161 31.4 35.094 34.610 35.579 0.247 11.000 10.770 11.230 0.117
Grade
   Well differentiated; Grade I 9,401 5.7 88.198 87.195 89.201 0.512
   Moderately differentiated; Grade II 24,427 14.7 66.738 66.037 67.438 0.357 65.000 62.200 67.800 1.429
   Poorly differentiated; Grade III 30,241 18.2 43.215 42.618 43.813 0.305 17.000 16.460 17.540 0.275
   Undifferentiated; anaplastic; Grade IV 3,019 1.8 28.703 27.116 30.291 0.810 10.000 9.372 10.628 0.321
   Others 99,009 59.6 34.430 34.050 34.810 0.194 14.000 13.784 14.216 0.110
Surgery
   Surgery performed 43,362 26.1 88.525 88.024 89.026 0.256
   No surgery performed 122,303 73.6 28.441 28.157 28.726 0.145 11.000 10.864 11.136 0.069
   Unknown 432 0.3 49.606 44.205 55.007 2.756 30.000 24.384 35.616 2.865
Radiation
   Yes 63,768 38.4 39.591 39.156 40.026 0.222 19.000 18.682 19.318 0.162
   No 100,974 60.8 49.454 49.082 49.827 0.190 22.000 21.469 22.531 0.271
   Unknown 1,355 0.8 42.844 39.680 46.008 1.614 20.000 17.325 22.675 1.365
Chemotherapy
   Yes 66,331 39.9 36.621 36.236 37.007 0.197 17.000 16.767 17.233 0.119
   No 99,766 60.1 52.872 52.482 53.262 0.199 28.000 27.212 28.788 0.402

Group 1, no intrapulmonary metastases; solitary tumor in the ipsilateral lung; Group 2, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, different lobe; Group 3, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, same lobe; Group 4, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, same and different lobes. DSS, disease-specific survival; Hist, histological; OS, overall survival.

Comparison of overall survival and survival between strata within each variable

Table 8 presents the overall comparison of the variables and the comparison between the categories within each variable using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, including the log-rank (Mantel-Cox), Breslow (Generalized Wilcoxon), and Tarone-Ware tests. Pair-wise Kaplan-Meier tests for the tumor group variable were all significant: (I) single-tumor vs. multi-lobe; (II) single-tumor vs. same-lobe; (III) single-tumor vs. mixed; (IV) multi-lobe vs. same-lobe; (V) multi-lobe vs. mixed; and (VI) same-lobe vs. mixed. No significant difference was observed in the survival analysis between patients aged <60 years and those aged 65–69 years. No significant difference was observed in the survival analysis results between patients aged 60–64 years and those aged 70–74 years.

Table 8

Overall comparison and pairwise comparison of each group in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis

Comparative factor Overall survival Disease-specific survival
Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) Breslow
(Generalized Wilcoxon)
Tarone-Ware Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) Breslow
(Generalized Wilcoxon)
Tarone-Ware
Chi-squared P value Chi-squared P value Chi-squared P value Chi-squared P value Chi-squared P value Chi-squared P value
Overall comparison
   Separate tumor nodules ipsilateral lung 4,451.69 <0.001 3,625.38 <0.001 4,097.90 <0.001 5,073.85 <0.001 3,955.17 <0.001 4,524.12 <0.001
   Age 5,881.78 <0.001 5,447.11 <0.001 5,653.50 <0.001 2,849.88 <0.001 3,258.57 <0.001 3,124.13 <0.001
   Sex 2,246.23 <0.001 1,950.65 <0.001 2,177.04 <0.001 1,623.79 <0.001 1,481.30 <0.001 1,616.71 <0.001
   Race 253.67 <0.001 265.51 <0.001 274.37 <0.001 158.10 <0.001 193.16 <0.001 187.90 <0.001
   Histologic type 6,374.01 <0.001 6,931.62 <0.001 6,934.48 <0.001 4,748.32 <0.001 5,257.26 <0.001 5,220.40 <0.001
   Grade 13,951.52 <0.001 12,729.73 <0.001 13,886.83 <0.001 12,738.16 <0.001 11,395.36 <0.001 12,474.84 <0.001
   Surgery 38,695.94 <0.001 33,467.33 <0.001 37,241.80 <0.001 34,806.25 <0.001 29,877.82 <0.001 33,188.64 <0.001
   Radiation 108.13 <0.001 776.84 <0.001 125.24 <0.001 149.64 <0.001 389.98 <0.001 32.49 <0.001
   Chemotherapy 77.94 <0.001 1,369.13 <0.001 255.40 <0.001 830.88 <0.001 386.13 <0.001 5.92 0.02
Pairwise comparison
   Separate tumor nodules ipsilateral lung
    Group 1 vs.
      Group 2 1,962.48 <0.001 1,618.78 <0.001 1,824.33 <0.001 2,240.77 <0.001 1,764.59 <0.001 2,013.92 <0.001
      Group 3 615.82 <0.001 420.28 <0.001 525.03 <0.001 668.74 <0.001 431.23 <0.001 546.39 <0.001
      Group 4 2,511.92 <0.001 2,126.74 <0.001 2,345.37 <0.001 2,919.65 <0.001 2,368.78 <0.001 2,646.53 <0.001
    Group 2 vs.
      Group 3 246.54 <0.001 240.74 <0.001 251.68 <0.001 285.89 <0.001 265.58 <0.001 282.18 <0.001
      Group 4 92.41 <0.001 77.41 <0.001 84.64 <0.001 107.68 <0.001 84.93 <0.001 95.15 <0.001
    Group 3 vs.
      Group 4 585.09 <0.001 539.81 <0.001 572.59 <0.001 681.71 <0.001 597.83 <0.001 645.46 <0.001
    Under 60 years old vs.
      60–64 years 56.03 <0.001 53.43 <0.001 52.67 <0.001 13.79 <0.001 20.15 <0.001 16.32 <0.001
      65–69 years 67.26 <0.001 59.10 <0.001 57.48 <0.001 1.99 0.16 7.00 0.008 3.30 0.07
      70–74 years 213.64 <0.001 174.69 <0.001 179.75 <0.001 15.82 <0.001 35.22 <0.001 22.89 <0.001
      75–79 years 764.43 <0.001 670.03 <0.001 693.07 <0.001 188.12 <0.001 253.02 <0.001 216.79 <0.001
      80+ years 3,873.81 <0.001 3,473.35 <0.001 3,643.50 <0.001 1,675.05 <0.001 1,975.51 <0.001 1,864.52 <0.001
    60–64 years vs.
      65–69 years 0.01 0.93 0.02 0.89 0.05 0.83 5.83 0.02 3.88 0.049 5.40 0.02
      70–74 years 36.28 <0.001 24.22 <0.001 26.34 <0.001 - 0.99 1.07 0.30 0.17 0.68
      75–79 years 336.44 <0.001 281.05 <0.001 298.47 <0.001 83.03 <0.001 105.69 <0.001 93.54 <0.001
      80+ years 2,496.40 <0.001 2,178.17 <0.001 2,326.89 <0.001 1,154.24 <0.001 1,295.48 <0.001 1,259.63 <0.001
    65–69 years vs.
      70–74 years 41.94 <0.001 29.84 <0.001 33.78 <0.001 6.85 0.009 10.25 0.001 8.65 0.003
      75–79 years 393.75 <0.001 333.16 <0.001 359.15 <0.001 153.82 <0.001 170.13 <0.001 164.45 <0.001
      80+ years 3,021.05 <0.001 2,650.25 <0.001 2,843.60 <0.001 1,593.61 <0.001 1,708.82 <0.001 1,702.97 <0.001
    70–74 years vs.
      75–79 years 187.23 <0.001 170.54 <0.001 180.54 <0.001 98.18 <0.001 99.47 <0.001 100.20 <0.001
      80+ years 2,424.93 <0.001 2,188.28 <0.001 2,333.25 <0.001 1,422.95 <0.001 1,486.19 <0.001 1,500.62 <0.001
    75–79 years vs.
      80+ years 1,165.66 <0.001 1,058.06 <0.001 1,126.83 <0.001 714.62 <0.001 756.68 <0.001 764.55 <0.001
   Sex
    Female vs. male 2,246.23 <0.001 1,950.65 <0.001 2,177.04 <0.001 1,623.79 <0.001 1,481.30 <0.001 1,616.71 <0.001
    White vs.
      Black 49.06 <0.001 32.10 <0.001 42.97 <0.001 53.39 <0.001 23.62 <0.001 37.48 <0.001
      Asian or Pacific Islander 178.74 <0.001 210.47 <0.001 205.48 <0.001 76.73 <0.001 142.87 <0.001 121.15 <0.001
      Others 1.77 0.18 1.31 0.25 1.41 0.23 10.96 0.001 11.87 0.001 11.80 0.001
    Black vs.
      Asian or Pacific Islander 236.54 <0.001 233.67 <0.001 249.89 <0.001 152.73 <0.001 165.69 <0.001 172.94 <0.001
      Others 13.03 <0.001 8.81 0.003 11.00 0.001 30.68 <0.001 23.77 <0.001 27.89 <0.001
    Asian or Pacific Islander vs.
      Others 9.97 0.002 14.23 <0.001 13.27 <0.001 0.09 0.77 0.30 0.59 0.07 0.79
   Histologic type
    Adenocarcinoma vs.
      Squamous cell carcinoma 1,338.84 <0.001 873.25 <0.001 1,102.56 <0.001 641.77 <0.001 496.01 <0.001 585.51 <0.001
      Others 6,193.30 <0.001 6,739.88 <0.001 6,761.19 <0.001 4,679.24 <0.001 5,107.30 <0.001 5,108.21 <0.001
    Squamous cell carcinoma vs.
      Others 957.60 <0.001 1,674.11 <0.001 1,415.35 <0.001 1,016.36 <0.001 1,430.32 <0.001 1,290.66 <0.001
   Grade
    Well differentiated; Grade I vs.
      Moderately differentiated; Grade II 1,086.01 <0.001 1,035.18 <0.001 1,088.41 <0.001 1,023.40 <0.001 955.37 <0.001 1,007.66 <0.001
      Poorly differentiated; Grade III 4,492.32 <0.001 4,415.01 <0.001 4,624.89 <0.001 4,363.36 <0.001 4,178.96 <0.001 4,396.38 <0.001
      Undifferentiated; anaplastic; Grade IV 3,995.05 <0.001 4,134.47 <0.001 4,166.77 <0.001 4,340.98 <0.001 4,301.94 <0.001 4,393.02 <0.001
      Others 7,548.58 <0.001 5,910.28 <0.001 6,998.84 <0.001 6,732.77 <0.001 5,215.58 <0.001 6,160.51 <0.001
      Poorly differentiated; Grade III 2,864.74 <0.001 3,306.87 <0.001 3,245.08 <0.001 3,015.82 <0.001 3,345.87 <0.001 3,316.25 <0.001
      Undifferentiated; anaplastic; Grade IV 2,046.23 <0.001 2,286.60 <0.001 2,254.30 <0.001 2,332.46 <0.001 2,479.98 <0.001 2,480.72 <0.001
      Others 7,800.82 <0.001 7,135.50 <0.001 7,820.95 <0.001 7,090.82 <0.001 6,357.24 <0.001 6,988.98 <0.001
    Poorly differentiated; Grade III vs.
      Undifferentiated; anaplastic; Grade IV 257.28 <0.001 234.51 <0.001 256.42 <0.001 291.58 <0.001 248.00 <0.001 277.07 <0.001
      Others 881.16 <0.001 721.13 <0.001 792.73 <0.001 598.49 <0.001 470.59 <0.001 521.33 <0.001
    Undifferentiated; anaplastic; Grade IV vs.
      Others 27.75 <0.001 19.36 <0.001 28.58 <0.001 65.61 <0.001 43.19 <0.001 60.31 <0.001
   Surgery
    Surgery performed vs.
      No surgery performed 38,655.67 <0.001 33,409.14 <0.001 37,189.31 <0.001 34,763.11 <0.001 29,819.00 <0.001 33,134.27 <0.001
      Unknown 353.06 <0.001 420.23 <0.001 400.69 <0.001 368.13 <0.001 413.42 <0.001 401.79 <0.001
    No surgery performed vs.
      Unknown 99.22 <0.001 99.99 <0.001 106.00 <0.001 90.54 <0.001 94.23 <0.001 98.77 <0.001
   Radiation
    Yes vs.
      No 107.66 <0.001 770.17 <0.001 123.93 <0.001 149.14 <0.001 381.58 <0.001 29.45 <0.001
      Unknown 0.59 0.44 0.68 0.41 0.03 0.86 3.07 0.08 0.49 0.49 1.37 0.24
    No vs.
      Unknown 0.78 0.38 18.13 <0.001 3.89 0.049 0.09 0.77 16.67 <0.001 4.58 0.03
   Chemotherapy
    Yes vs. no 77.94 <0.001 1,369.13 <0.001 255.40 <0.001 830.88 <0.001 386.13 <0.001 5.92 0.01

Group 1, no intrapulmonary metastases; solitary tumor in the ipsilateral lung; Group 2, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, different lobe; Group 3, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, same lobe; Group 4, separate nodules of same hist type in ipsilateral lung, same and different lobes. Hist, histological.


Discussion

According to the 9th edition of the tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) staging system for lung cancer, satellite nodules within the same lobe as the primary tumor are classified as T3, whereas those in different lobes on the same side of the primary tumor are classified as T4 (16). Among the four categories of the independent variable in this study, the third category (same-lobe), defined as separate nodules located in the same lobe, corresponded to T3, whereas the second category (multi-lobe), defined as nodules located in different lobes on the same side of the primary tumor, corresponded to T4. The fourth category (mixed) included nodules involving both the same and different lobes on the same side of the lungs. This study analyzed a large dataset of survival outcomes in patients with lung cancer who had same-lobe nodules, multi-lobe nodules, and nodules in both the same and different lobes (mixed) on the same side as the primary tumor.

In this study, the survival data of 166,097 patients with lung cancer were analyzed, revealing that the mortality risk increased by 16.2% (OS) and 17.9% (DSS) in patients in the same-lobe group compared with those with a single primary lesion. Similarly, the mortality risk increased by 22.5% (OS) and 27.7% (DSS) for patients in the multi-lobe group compared to those with a single primary lesion. When nodules were present in both the same and different lobes on the same side (mixed group), the mortality risk increased by 35.7% (OS) and 41.8% (DSS) compared with a single primary lesion (Table 3). Thus, the risk in the multi-lobe group exceeded the same-lobe group by 6.3% (OS) and 9.8% (DSS), and the mixed group exceeded both by 19.5% (OS) and 23.9% (DSS) compared to the same-lobe group, and by 13.2% (OS) and 14.1% (DSS) compared to the multi-lobe group. Stratified by surgery (Tables 4,5), mortality for surgically treated patients increased by 37.9% (OS) and 45.5% (DSS) in the same-lobe group, 71.6% (OS) and 104.7% (DSS) in the multi-lobe group, and 137.9% (OS) and 198.4% (DSS) in the mixed group, compared with patients with a single primary lesion. Among non-surgical patients, the excess risk was 12.3% (OS) and 13.8% (DSS) in the same-lobe group, 18.1% (OS) and 22.5% (DSS) in the multi-lobe group, and 30.1% (OS) and 35.8% (DSS) in the mixed group.

The research conducted by Zhang et al. differs from the focus of this study. Additionally, the study by Zhang et al. (17) included only 1,732 individuals with non-small cell lung cancer and metastasis in the same lung that underwent surgical resection. In contrast, 166,097 patients with lung cancer were included in this study. To date, no large-sample survival analysis studies on related topics with sample sizes exceeding 100,000 patients have been conducted. One study found that the occurrence of malignant tumors in nodules on the same side as the original tumor after surgery was significantly higher (39%) than the long-term follow-up rate of 4.8% (18). Li et al. indicated that thorough removal of all lesions in one operation can not only ease a patient’s anxiety after surgery but also lower the risk of complications and issues related to further surgical interventions (19). Is it recommended that a single operation be performed to remove all ground-glass nodules in different lobes on one side of the chest? This question has been explored in several studies (19-23). Moon suggests that lobectomy can be performed when multiple malignant pulmonary nodules are located deep in a single lobe or when one or more major nodules are located in one lobe. Conversely, when pulmonary nodules of uniform size are scattered across multiple lobes or a single lobe, multisite wedge resection may be performed (23).

Thus, the mixed, same-lobe, and multi-lobe patterns all conferred an increased risk in surgically treated patients. This finding may be because patients with single-lesion lung cancer typically receive more thorough postoperative treatment, whereas patients with mixed nodules are usually clinically selected for a single surgery to remove all lung nodules when the inherent complexity of such a procedure as well as the increase in the extent of the resection may lead to an increased risk of postoperative complications, such as lung infections, respiratory failure, and hypercoagulable states, which could explain the high risk of death. Studies have shown that when performing multilobectomy, an increased duration of surgery may increase the risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Hong et al. compared the effects of unilobar surgery and multilobar surgery in patients with unilateral multilobar pulmonary nodules (24). The results showed that the operative time was significantly longer in the multilobar resection group than in the unilobar resection group, postoperative symptoms were more severe and functional impairment was more pronounced. There is also the possibility of delayed treatment due to secondary and post-secondary surgery. For patients with lung cancer who have not undergone surgery, the treatment is primarily systemic, and radiotherapy is often used to treat multiple lesions simultaneously. Whenever technically feasible and safe, removing all nodules from different lobes during a single surgery may reduce mortality.

Our study had some limitations. The generalizability of the findings might be restricted by selection bias introduced by the retrospective design. Additionally, the sample size, which is sufficient for analysis, may not capture all variability across populations. Detailed molecular data were not available, potentially limiting insights into the biological mechanisms underlying the observed associations. Furthermore, variations in imaging techniques and reporting standards may have influenced the identification of satellite nodules. Ultimately, prospective clinical validation studies are necessary to ensure that these findings are applicable to a broader population and a variety of clinical settings.


Conclusions

Our study found that same-lobe, multi-lobe, and mixed patterns were associated with markedly higher mortality than single-tumor disease, and surgery may further amplify this risk.


Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the participants for dedicating their time and effort during the data collection stage. We also appreciate the support from the renowned Hu Jian Workstation in Taizhou City.


Footnote

Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the STROBE reporting checklist. Available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-2025-445/rc

Peer Review File: Available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-2025-445/prf

Funding: This research received financial support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2022YFC2407303) and the Zhejiang Provincial Research Center for Lung Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment Technology (No. JBZX-202007).

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-2025-445/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2024;74:229-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Han B, Zheng R, Zeng H, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022. J Natl Cancer Cent 2024;4:47-53. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209-49. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394-424. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Niemira M, Collin F, Szalkowska A, et al. Molecular Signature of Subtypes of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer by Large-Scale Transcriptional Profiling: Identification of Key Modules and Genes by Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis (WGCNA). Cancers (Basel) 2019;12:37. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Passaro A, Brahmer J, Antonia S, et al. Managing Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Cancer: Treatment and Novel Strategies. J Clin Oncol 2022;40:598-610. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Xiang Y, Liu X, Wang Y, et al. Mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: promising strategies to overcoming challenges. Front Immunol 2024;15:1366260. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. McPherson I, Bradley NA, Govindraj R, et al. The progression of non-small cell lung cancer from diagnosis to surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020;46:1882-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Detterbeck FC, Nicholson AG, Franklin WA, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Summary of Proposals for Revisions of the Classification of Lung Cancers with Multiple Pulmonary Sites of Involvement in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11:639-50.
  10. Salazar MC, Rosen JE, Arnold BN, et al. Adjuvant Chemotherapy for T3 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Additional Tumor Nodules in the Same Lobe. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11:1090-100. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Kim AW, Cooke DT. Additional pulmonary nodules in the patient with lung cancer: controversies and challenges. Clin Chest Med 2011;32:811-25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Li M, Shen G, Gao F, et al. CT-guided fine-needle localization of ground-glass nodules in re-aerated lung specimens: localization of solitary small nodules or multiple nodules within the same lobe. Diagn Interv Radiol 2015;21:391-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Che WQ, Li YJ, Tsang CK, et al. How to use the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data: research design and methodology. Mil Med Res 2023;10:50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Hankey BF, Ries LA, Edwards BK. The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:1117-21.
  15. Scosyrev E, Messing J, Noyes K, et al. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program and population-based research in urologic oncology: an overview. Urol Oncol 2012;30:126-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Huang J, Osarogiagbon RU, Giroux DJ, et al. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project for Lung Cancer: Proposals for the Revision of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2024;19:766-85.
  17. Zhang J, Zhang J. Prognostic factors and survival prediction of resected non-small cell lung cancer with ipsilateral pulmonary metastases: a study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. BMC Pulm Med 2023;23:413. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Stiles BM, Schulster M, Nasar A, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of secondary nodules identified on initial computed tomography scan for patients undergoing resection for primary non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;149:19-24. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Li Q, Xiao T, Li J, et al. The diagnosis and management of multiple ground-glass nodules in the lung. Eur J Med Res 2024;29:305. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Lee CT. What do we know about ground-glass opacity nodules in the lung? Transl Lung Cancer Res 2015;4:656-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Chen D, Dai C, Kadeer X, et al. New horizons in surgical treatment of ground-glass nodules of the lung: experience and controversies. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2018;14:203-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang Y, Fu F, Chen H. Management of Ground-Glass Opacities in the Lung Cancer Spectrum. Ann Thorac Surg 2020;110:1796-804. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. Lee HY, Choi YL, Lee KS, et al. Pure ground-glass opacity neoplastic lung nodules: histopathology, imaging, and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:W224-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  24. Hong Q, Yi H, Wang Y, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in the early postoperative period following resection of unilateral multiple pulmonary nodules: implications for surgical decision-making. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2025;14:27-39. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Ye J, Liu J, Ma Y, Wang Y, Xia P, Lv W, Hu S, Hu J. Increased mortality in lung cancer patients with same-lobe, multi-lobe, or mixed nodules: a retrospective study of 166,097 participants from the SEER database. J Thorac Dis 2025;17(7):4439-4472. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-445

Download Citation