Original Article
Utility of thrombophilia testing in patients with venous thrombo-embolism
Abstract
Background: Clinical practice of thrombophilia testing those with venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) in public hospitals may not be consistent with the international guidelines. This study aims to assess whether practice of thrombophilia testing in two public hospitals are consistent with international guidelines, and to assess whether certain groups of patients were more likely to benefit from testing.
Methods: A retrospective audit on patients who presented to two Queensland public hospitals from August 2011 to September 2012 with VTE. Data were collected on demographics, yield of the test, and whether the result of the test changed the duration of anticoagulation. Group analysis was performed to identify patients who were more likely to yield positive results.
Results: Of the 152 patients, 49% were tested for thrombophilia, of whom 31% returned a positive result. 38% of patients with provoked VTE were tested for thrombophilia, inconsistent with guideline recommendations. In 1.2% of cases there were documented changes to duration of anticoagulation with positive results. The rates of positive results were 45% in unprovoked VTE cases compared with 29% in provoked VTE cases (P=0.054). The rates of positive results were 52% in recurrent VTE cases compared with 27% in those cases with first episode of VTE (P=0.007).
Conclusions: The practice of thrombophilia testing in public hospitals was frequently inconsistent with guidelines, and did not significantly influence clinical decisions. There was higher yield of testing in patients with recurrent episodes of VTE and possibly in patients with unprovoked VTE.
Methods: A retrospective audit on patients who presented to two Queensland public hospitals from August 2011 to September 2012 with VTE. Data were collected on demographics, yield of the test, and whether the result of the test changed the duration of anticoagulation. Group analysis was performed to identify patients who were more likely to yield positive results.
Results: Of the 152 patients, 49% were tested for thrombophilia, of whom 31% returned a positive result. 38% of patients with provoked VTE were tested for thrombophilia, inconsistent with guideline recommendations. In 1.2% of cases there were documented changes to duration of anticoagulation with positive results. The rates of positive results were 45% in unprovoked VTE cases compared with 29% in provoked VTE cases (P=0.054). The rates of positive results were 52% in recurrent VTE cases compared with 27% in those cases with first episode of VTE (P=0.007).
Conclusions: The practice of thrombophilia testing in public hospitals was frequently inconsistent with guidelines, and did not significantly influence clinical decisions. There was higher yield of testing in patients with recurrent episodes of VTE and possibly in patients with unprovoked VTE.
