Original Article
Values of aortic dissection detection risk score combined with ascending aorta diameter >40 mm for the early identification of type A acute aortic dissection
Abstract
Background: Type A acute aortic dissection (A-AAD), involving the ascending aorta, is a life-threatening disease. To detect A-AAD early and rapidly in patients with acute chest pain, especially in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) secondary to A-AAD, we investigated values of combined use of the risk score and the ascending aorta diameter >40 mm for the early identification of A-AAD.
Methods: Our study retrospectively encompassed 239 patients with acute chest pain on admission to our hospital between July 2010 and December 2016. The risk score was calculated according to the aortic dissection detection (ADD) risk score system, and the ascending aorta diameter was accurately obtained from the transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).
Results: A risk score ≥1 had an excellent sensitivity of 94.9% and a fair negative predictive value (NPV) of 77.8%, with a poor specificity of 8.7% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 33.5% for the diagnosis of A-AAD. A risk score ≥2 had an excellent specificity of 91.3% and a fair NPV of 73.1%, whereas it had a lower sensitivity of 30.8% and a PPV of 63.2%. A risk score ≥1, combined with an ascending aorta diameter >40 mm, had a sensitivity, a specificity, a PPV, and an NPV of 84.6%, 87.6%, 76.7%, and 92.2% for the diagnosis of A-AAD, respectively. The combined use of a risk score ≥2 and an ascending aorta diameter >40 mm had an excellent specificity of 98.1% and a PPV of 86.4%, a fair NPV of 72.8%, and a poor sensitivity of 24.4% for the detection of A-AAD. Moreover, the omission diagnostic rate for A-AAD was significantly decreased from 33.3% to 7.4% using a risk score ≥1 combined with an ascending aorta diameter >40 mm in patients with AMI secondary to A-AAD.
Conclusions: The combined use of an ADD risk score ≥1 and an ascending aorta diameter >40 mm was highly indicative of A-AAD in patients presenting with acute chest pain, especially in patients with AMI secondary to A-AAD, which urgently needed computed tomography angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to confirm the diagnosis of A-AAD.
Methods: Our study retrospectively encompassed 239 patients with acute chest pain on admission to our hospital between July 2010 and December 2016. The risk score was calculated according to the aortic dissection detection (ADD) risk score system, and the ascending aorta diameter was accurately obtained from the transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).
Results: A risk score ≥1 had an excellent sensitivity of 94.9% and a fair negative predictive value (NPV) of 77.8%, with a poor specificity of 8.7% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 33.5% for the diagnosis of A-AAD. A risk score ≥2 had an excellent specificity of 91.3% and a fair NPV of 73.1%, whereas it had a lower sensitivity of 30.8% and a PPV of 63.2%. A risk score ≥1, combined with an ascending aorta diameter >40 mm, had a sensitivity, a specificity, a PPV, and an NPV of 84.6%, 87.6%, 76.7%, and 92.2% for the diagnosis of A-AAD, respectively. The combined use of a risk score ≥2 and an ascending aorta diameter >40 mm had an excellent specificity of 98.1% and a PPV of 86.4%, a fair NPV of 72.8%, and a poor sensitivity of 24.4% for the detection of A-AAD. Moreover, the omission diagnostic rate for A-AAD was significantly decreased from 33.3% to 7.4% using a risk score ≥1 combined with an ascending aorta diameter >40 mm in patients with AMI secondary to A-AAD.
Conclusions: The combined use of an ADD risk score ≥1 and an ascending aorta diameter >40 mm was highly indicative of A-AAD in patients presenting with acute chest pain, especially in patients with AMI secondary to A-AAD, which urgently needed computed tomography angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to confirm the diagnosis of A-AAD.
