Novel techniques for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery segmentectomy
Review Article

Novel techniques for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery segmentectomy

Mingyon Mun, Masayuki Nakao, Yosuke Matsuura, Junji Ichinose, Ken Nakagawa, Sakae Okumura

Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: M Mun; (II) Administrative support: M Mun; (III) Provision of study material or patients: M Mun; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: M Mun; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: M Mun; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Correspondence to: Mingyon Mun, MD, PhD. Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-31Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan. Email:

Abstract: Small lung cancers are being increasing diagnosed because of advances in computed tomography (CT) and low-dose CT screening. Sublobar resection of peripheral, small lung nodules, such as ground-glass nodules, is a useful therapeutic option that obtains both a pathological diagnosis and radical cure. Lung segmentectomy is a better option than wedge resection for securing a sufficient surgical margin and can also be used to assess hilar nodes. Anatomical segmentectomy, however, is a technically more complicated operative procedure than standard lobectomy. We describe the issues and novel techniques of video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy.

Keywords: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; segmentectomy; indocyanine green fluorescence; three-dimensional reconstruction

Submitted May 24, 2018. Accepted for publication May 30, 2018.

doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.207


Lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection has been the standard procedure for removing early-stage non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Recently, however, detection of small peripheral lung nodules, such as ground-glass nodules (GGNs), is increasing. Pure or partly solid GGNs are not associated with angiolymphatic invasion, so the intentional indication of sublobar resection for such lesions has been increasing. In contrast, a compromised indication of sublobar resection in high-risk patients, including octogenarians, those with poor pulmonary reserve, and patients with multiple ling cancers, has been increasing.

Although sublobar resection includes segmentectomy and wedge resection, the intention of each procedure is quite different. Lung anatomical segmentectomy has some advantages over wedge resection in that it obtains a sufficient surgical margin and enables evaluation of hilar nodes. Segmentectomy, however, is a more difficult procedure than wedge resection or lobectomy. In addition, the preoperative planning and decision making for segmentectomy are different for each surgeon. Intraoperatively, the surgeon must choose how to divide the lung parenchyma. Among the various methods for dividing lung parenchyma, non-anatomical division is the simplest, although atelectasis of residual lung or an insufficient surgical margin after parenchymal division may occur. To avoid these situations, the intersegmental plane must be identified correctly during the operation. Hence, there are some issues of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy. We describe the novel techniques that have been devised for accomplishing VATS segmentectomy of small, peripheral NSCLCs.

VATS segmentectomy for NSCLC


Early on, the operative indication for performing segmentectomy had been to address benign lung tumors such as bronchiectasis, tuberculoma, and aspergilloma (1-3). Since 1960, the standard surgical procedure for early-stage lung cancer was lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection (4). In 1995, Ginsburg et al. reported a prospective, randomized, controlled trial that evaluated lobectomy versus limited resection for T1N0 NSCLC (5). The trial showed that, compared with lobectomy, limited resection was associated with a higher incidence of local recurrence and a poorer prognosis. Since then, the standard procedure for early-stage NSCLCs has been lobectomy with lymph node dissection. However, there were some limitations in that report. One is that many wedge resections were included in a limited resection group. The other is that many large tumors (nearly 3 cm), for which it was difficult to obtain a sufficient surgical margin by limited resection, were included in the limited resection group.

Since 2000, there have been some positive data on segmentectomy for selected patients (6-8). In addition, many pure GGN lesions, which are almost always non-invasive, have been detected by low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening. For pure GGN lesions with a consolidation-to-tumor ratio of <0.5—which includes pathological adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma—sublobar resection may be suitable for curative resection if a sufficient surgical margin is obtained (9). In contrast, the use of segmentectomy for radiologically invasive lung cancer (consolidation-to-tumor ratio >0.5) has been controversial. In Japan, a multicenter Japanese trial—A Phase III Randomized Trial of Lobectomy Versus Limited Resection for Small-Sized Peripheral Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer—has been recruiting patients with NCLCs of ≤2 cm that are radiologically peripherally invasive (10). That study has now been closed to registration, and we are looking forward to its results on whether a segmentation procedure is indicated for invasive lung cancers.

Lung segmentectomy is basically a lung preservation procedure. We sometimes perform VATS segmentectomy in compromised individuals, including octogenarians, patients with poor pulmonary reserve, and others at high risk.

Preoperative planning

Patient selection and preoperative planning of the procedure is important when segmentectomy is chosen. Insufficient surgical margins may lead to local recurrence at the cutting surface. Shuchert et al. showed that, for patients with stage I NSCLC, recurrence was more frequent in those whose deflated margin/tumor ratio was <1 (11). As a rule, we currently plan VATS segmentectomy for patients whose preoperative evaluation indicated the possibility of a surgical margin that was greater than the tumor size. Previously, when planning segmentectomy, we analyzed more anatomical structures on the distal side than when planning lobectomy and chose a surgical procedure based only on axial, coronal, and sagittal view of CT images (Figure 1A). We could then imagine the intersegmental plane and could judge whether the surgical margin was sufficient. Recently, however, multidetector-row computed tomography is routinely performed preoperatively. Using these data, we obtain three-dimensional simulation of the vascular structures, the segmental bronchus, and tumor using simulation software (Volume Analyzer Synapse Vincent; Fujifilm Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan). Based on these data, we can then easily understand the anatomical variances in each patient. In addition, the simulation workstation allows us to create a virtual intersegmental plane after plotting the dominant segmental pulmonary artery and to measure the surgical margin from the tumor to the closest intersegmental plane (Figure 1B) (12). This workstation allows proper preoperative planning for each patient.

Figure 1 Preoperative evaluation. (A) Thin-slice computed tomography shows a part solid ground-glass nodule (GGN) in right segment 2a; (B) a virtual intersegmental plane can be established.

Intraoperative confirmation of nodules

We believe that segmentectomy is indicated for radiologically non-invasive NSCLCs such as those with a GGN appearance. If the GGN is located at ≥1 cm depth from the lung surface, it is generally difficult to palpate. Several techniques have therefore been described that allow preoperative marking of hardly palpable nodules, with a CT- or bronchoscope-guided technique mainly performed. CT-guided marking techniques that use percutaneous hookwire placement or dye injection are the most common (13,14). However, puncturing the visceral pleura (VP) is an associated hazard that may result in complications such as air embolism (15,16). To avoid these complications, we earlier reported a new marking technique that does not require VP puncture (17,18).

Bronchoscope-guided marking techniques can be performed without puncturing the VP (19,20). Sato et al. described the use of visually assisted lung mapping for anatomical segmentectomy (19). Bronchoscopic, multi-spot dye markings are set preoperatively, and the resection line is established using these markings. These marking techniques, however, require both expensive equipment and expert skills. Recently, marking techniques are being performed just before surgery in a hybrid operating room equipped with cone-beam CT or electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (21-23). These methods can effectively localize tumors and identify the resection line along the intersegmental plane.

Identifying the intersegmental plane

The intersegmental plane near the hilum is regulated by intersegmental veins. We cannot detect these veins, however, in the distal lung parenchyma. Nevertheless, we need to identify the intersegmental plane before dividing the lung parenchyma. If the surgical margin is sufficient, we could divide the lung parenchyma non-anatomically. With such division, however, atelectasis of the residual lung or a closed surgical margin might occur. Thus, identifying the intersegmental plane during the operation is important when performing anatomical segmentectomy.

There are two ways to identify the intersegmental plane: One uses the segmental bronchi, and the other uses the segmental artery. In 2000, Tsubota reported an improved method for identifying the intersegmental plane (24). They noted that once the whole lung was inflated, the segmental bronchus could be ligated or stapled. Then, following whole-lung deflation, the target segmental area became inflated. This targeted segmental inflation method is simple and effective for securing the surgical margin. We can also measure the actual surgical margin using an inflated specimen. Okada et al. reported the use of selective segmental inflation via jet ventilation (25). Endoh et al. reported the use of a slip knot to close the selective segmental bronchi (26). After inflating the whole lung, they closed the targeted segmental bronchi using a slip knot.

There are some limitations of the selective segmental inflation methods. Identifying the demarcation of the intersegmental plane is sometimes difficult in the patient with emphysema, and the technique depends on the skill of the anesthesiologist (Figure 2). In addition, once segmental is inflated insufficiently, it blocks visualizing the operative field during VATS, making it difficult to close the lung parenchyma using staplers.

Figure 2 Insufficient inflation–deflation line. (A) Segment 2 is inflated, and the other segments are deflated from the lateral aspect; (B) insufficient inflation–deflation line is seen to form a fissure.

Sekine et al. reported transbronchial injection of indocyanine green (ICG) for demarcation (27). With this method, the authors confirmed the intersegmental plane not only at the surface but also in lung parenchyma. In our experience, however, the injected air or ICG spreads to adjacent segments over the intersegmental border via Kohn’s pores. Thus, demarcation may not be correct using these techniques.

Another way to identify the intersegmental plane is to use the segmental pulmonary artery. Misaki et al. reported that near-infrared thoracoscopy with ICG makes it possible to identify the targeted lung segment easily and quickly without the need for lung inflation (28). ICG may also be used to assess liver function.

ICG has unique characteristics. After intravenously injecting ICG, it binds to plasma proteins. If near-infrared light (805 nm) is absorbed by ICG in plasma, it emits fluorescence at a wavelength of 835 nm, which can be seen using near-infrared thoracoscopy. Regarding segmentectomy, both the segmental pulmonary artery and bronchi of the targeted segment are divided. Then, after injecting the ICG (0.25 mg/kg), its fluorescence (ICGF) can be seen with near-infrared thoracoscopy (Figure 3A). Currently, we usually use a near-infrared thoracoscopy system (D-Light P system; Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) for this purpose. After marking along this border, lung parenchyma is finally divided by staplers (Figure 3B).

Figure 3 Indocyanine green fluorescence images and the final aspect. (A) Right segment 2 appears dark, and the residual segment appears bright. The border between these two areas is recognized as the intersegmental plane (arrows); (B) final aspect after thoracoscopic right segment 2 segmentectomy.

In 2016, we reported our initial results of ICGF-navigated thoracoscopic segmentectomy (29). We concluded that this method was feasible but had some limitations. First, ICG may be rapidly washed out, resulting in the loss of staining. Second, in difficult settings, such as severe anthracosis on the lung surface, visualizing a clear contour pattern could be problematic because of the hypovascularity of the lung surface. Third, ICGF spreads into target segments, resulting in reduced clear contrast. Fourth, although ICGF could be observed on the lung surface, it could not be seen on the ongoing dissection plane. Fifth, marking the demarcation line with electrocautery had to be performed carefully because the background is dark in ICG mode. Currently, some companies have released near-infrared thoracoscopy equipment that merge visible light images with the fluorescent images on display (Figure 4). Surgeons can make their personal choices about using them.

Figure 4 Near-infrared thoracoscopy. (A) Pinpoint; Novadaq, Kalamazoo, MI, USA. Intersegmental plane (arrows); (B) Visera Elite II; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan. Clear contrast is observed, with the background also apparent. Intersegmental plane (arrows).

Final thoughts

The most important issue with segmentectomy is how to choose the proper surgical margin. To address this issue, we should do more to achieve proper selection of the patient, and the most advantageous surgical procedure for that patient, to avoid local recurrence after segmentectomy. Selected patients who undergo segmentectomy should survive without recurrence using surgical treatment alone.




Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


  1. Churchill ED, Belsey R. Segmental pneumonectomy in bronchiectasis: the lingual segment of the left upper lobe. Ann Surg 1939;109:481-99. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Blades B. Conversion of lung tissue by partial lobectomy. Ann Surg 1943;118:353-65. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Overholt RH, Woods FM, Betts RH. An improved method of resection of pulmonary segments; report of a technique applied in 70 operations. J Thorac Surg 1948;17:464-79. [PubMed]
  4. Cahan WG. Radical lobectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1960;39:555-72. [PubMed]
  5. Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer: Lung Cancer Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:615-22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Ketchedjian A, Daly B, Landreneau R, et al. Sublobar resection for the subcentimeter pulmonary nodule. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;17:128-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Okada M, Koike T, Higashiyama M, et al. Radical sublobar resection for small-sized non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:769-75. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Ichiki Y, Hanagiri T, Baba T, et al. Limited pulmonary resection for peripheral small-sized adenocarcinoma of the lung. Int J Surg 2011;9:155-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Suzuki K, Koike T, Asakawa T, et al. A prospective radiological study of thin-section computed tomography to predict pathological noninvasiveness in peripheral clinical IA lung cancer (Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0201). J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:751-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Nakamura K, Saji H, Nakajima R, et al. A phase III randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for small-sized peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L). Jpn J Clin Oncol 2010;40:271-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Shuchert MJ, Abbas G, Awais O, et al. Anatomic segmentectomy for the solitary pulmonary nodule and early-stage lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:1780-5; discussion 1786-7.
  12. Saji H, Inoue T, Kato Y, et al. Virtual segmentectomy based on high-quality three-dimensional lung modelling from computed tomography images. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013;17:227-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Sugi K, Kaneda Y, Hirasawa K, et al. Radioisotope marking under CT guidance and localization using a handheld gamma probe for small or indistinct pulmonary lesions Chest 2003;124:155-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Sortini D, Feo C, Maraveglas K, et al. Intrathoracoscopic localization techniques. Review literature Surg Endosc 2006;20:1341-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Sakiyama s, Kondo K, Matsuoka H, et al. Fatal air embolism during computed tomography-guided pulmonary marking with a hook-type marker. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:1207-9.
  16. Horan TA, Pinheiro PM, Araujo LM, et al. Massive gas embolism during pulmonary nodule hook wire location. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1647-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Matsuura Y, Mun M, Nakagawa K, et al. Efficacy and feasibility of a novel and noninvasive computed tomography-guided marking technique for peripheral pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;149:1208-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Mun M, Matsuura Y, Nakao M, et al. Noninvasive computed tomography-guided marking technique for peripheral pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Dis 2016;8:S672-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Sato M, Omasa M, Chen F, et al. Use of Virtual Assisted Lung Mapping (VAL-MAP), a bronchoscopic multi-spot dye-marking technique using virtual images, for precise navigation of thoracoscopic sublobar lung resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;147:1813-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Okumura T, Kondo H, Suzuki K, et al. Fluoroscopy-assisted thoracoscopic surgery after computed tomography-guided bronchoscopic barium marking. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:439-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Rouzé S, de Latour B, Flécher E, et al. Small pulmonary nodule localization of with cone beam computed tomography during video-assisted thoracic surgery: a feasibility study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016;22:705-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Muñoz-Largacha JA, Ebright MI, Litle VR, et al. Electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy with dye marking for identification of small peripheral lung nodules during minimally invasive surgical resection. J Thorac Dis 2017;9:802-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. Zhao ZR, Lau RWH, Ng CSH. Hybrid theatre and uniportal VATS: the perfect match for lung nodule localization. Thorac Surg Clin 2017;27:347-55. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  24. Tsubota N. An improved method for distinguishing the intersegmental plane of the lung. Surg Today 2000;30:963-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  25. Okada M, Mimura T, Ikegaki J, et al. A novel video-assisted anatomic segmentectomy technique: selective segmental inflation via bronchofiberoptic jet followed by cautery cutting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:753-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  26. Endoh M, Oizumi H, Kato H, et al. How to demarcate intersegmental plane with resected-segments inflation method using the slip knot technique in thoracoscopic anatomic segmentectomy. J Vis Surg 2017;3:100. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  27. Sekine Y, Ko E, Oishi H, et al. A simple and effective technique for identification of intersegmental planes by infrared thoracoscopy after transbronchial injection of indocyanine green. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143:1330-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  28. Misaki N, Chan SS, Gotoh M, et al. A novel method for determining adjacent lung segments with infrared thoracoscopy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;138:613-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  29. Mun M, Okumura S, Nakao M, et al. Indocyanine green fluorescence-navigated thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy. J Vis Surg 2017;3:80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Mun M, Nakao M, Matsuura Y, Ichinose J, Nakagawa K, Okumura S. Novel techniques for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery segmentectomy. J Thorac Dis 2018;10(Suppl 14):S1671-S1676. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.207

Download Citation