Original Article
Should minimally invasive lung adenocarcinoma be transferred from stage IA1 to stage 0 in future updates of the TNM staging system?
Abstract
Background: The 8th International Association Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) TNM classification staging project for lung cancer has classified patients with adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) into stage 0, while patients with a minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) were classified into stage IA1. However, MIA patients, similar to AIS patients, have an approximately a 100% 5-year survival. This study aimed to investigate if MIA could be transferred from stage IA to stage 0 in the next TNM staging system.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1,524 consecutive patients with a pathologically confirmed AIS, MIA and an invasive adenocarcinoma (IADC) in stage IA1. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed to evaluate survival difference between these three groups.
Results: There were 412 AIS, 675 MIA and 437 IADC patients in stage IA1. No statistically significant differences for DFS and OS (P=0.109) were seen between the AIS and MIA groups. Patients of the IADC group had significantly worse DFS (P=0.003) but the OS rate (P=0.941) was insignificant when compared with the MIA patients. Similar survival results were seen when comparisons were made between the IADC and AIS/MIA groups. The IADC group had a worse DFS (P=0.001) rate but no OS (P=0.380) difference with the AIS/MIA groups.
Conclusions: Patients with AIS and MIA had similar post-surgical survival rates. We propose that MIA may potentially be transferred from IA1 to stage 0 in the future.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1,524 consecutive patients with a pathologically confirmed AIS, MIA and an invasive adenocarcinoma (IADC) in stage IA1. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed to evaluate survival difference between these three groups.
Results: There were 412 AIS, 675 MIA and 437 IADC patients in stage IA1. No statistically significant differences for DFS and OS (P=0.109) were seen between the AIS and MIA groups. Patients of the IADC group had significantly worse DFS (P=0.003) but the OS rate (P=0.941) was insignificant when compared with the MIA patients. Similar survival results were seen when comparisons were made between the IADC and AIS/MIA groups. The IADC group had a worse DFS (P=0.001) rate but no OS (P=0.380) difference with the AIS/MIA groups.
Conclusions: Patients with AIS and MIA had similar post-surgical survival rates. We propose that MIA may potentially be transferred from IA1 to stage 0 in the future.
