Clinical applications of next-generation sequencing
The ultimate goal of elucidating the mechanisms of
cancer pathogenesis is to improve strategies for diagnosis,
prognostication and treatment of patients with cancer. Detailed
molecular subtyping at the time of diagnosis permits selection
of personalised therapies for patients who are most likely to
benefit. This benefits not only the individual receiving treatment
but spares others, and the community, the cost and morbidity
of futile intervention ( 49, 50). Next-generation sequencing may
also be incorporated into patient selection algorithms for clinical
trials. Improved techniques for tumour categorisation in clinical
trials will increase statistical power to detect clinically important
results ( 50).
A thorough understanding of the molecular drivers of
cancer may ultimately allow prediction of an individual’s risk of
developing cancer on the basis of their constitutional genome
sequence. The presence of genetic variants and non-genetic
contributors to cancer phenotypes will limit the precision of
such prediction. Nevertheless, discovery of mutations and
chromosomal changes predictive of disease may permit risk
reduction and prevention strategies for some cancers ( 50).
The widespread application of NGS, both in research
and clinical settings, raises many practical and ethical issues.
Experiments are expensive and the results, to some extent,
unpredictable. Institutional ethical approval, patient consent,
intellectual property and data release all require careful
consideration. Given the costly and demanding nature of NGS,
coordinated applications such as TCGA are critical in order to
maximise use of resources ( 51).
Issues for Clinical Translation
Sample Processing
Translating the discoveries obtained by whole genome
sequencing into clinical practice will require thoughtfully
designed clinical trials that incorporate genomic studies into the
patient care algorithm. Procurement of high quality, tumourrich,
fresh frozen specimens with matched blood samples from
consented patients is critical, as is optimal specimen processing
to ensure the absence of artefacts in the sequencing data
obtained.
Specimens require storage under conditions which maintain
the integrity of nucleic acids ( 52).
Tissue samples are often formalin-fixed and paraffinembedded
(FFPE). While DNA extracted from such specimens
may still be suitable for whole genome sequencing, FFPE
processing, especially fixative concentration and pH, and
duration of FFPE storage may disturb DNA integrity ( 53, 54).
The technical challenges of using archived FFPE samples for
direct DNA sequencing were highlighted during reanalysis of
the landmark BR.21 study, which used direct DNA sequencing
to screen for EGFR mutations (55). Mutational analysis was
attempted on 197 samples, of which 40 (20.3%) required
microdissection to obtain sufficient tumour for analysis. Due to technical difficulties, mutation analysis was not possible in 20
(10%) samples ( 55).
Whole genome sequencing must overcome challenges
posed by clinical samples, which may be of suboptimal size,
contain necrotic tumour, have high stromal or non-tumoral
content, or yield fragmented DNA. These limitations have
prompted the development of novel experimental approaches
and computational methods in order to obtain accurate secondgeneration
sequencing data from FFPE samples ( 56, 57).
Tumour Content in Diagnostic Samples
Whole genome sequencing using NGS is typically performed on
surgically resected tumour samples ( 58, 59). However, as most
patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, such specimens
are obtained in only a minority of patients with NSCLC ( 60).
In situations where surgically resected specimens are available
for whole genome sequencing, DNA quality from fresh/frozen
samples is better, yielding more accurate sequencing data than
tissue processed by FFPE ( 61, 62).
In patients with advanced lung cancer, only diagnostic
biopsy samples that can be obtained with minimal morbidity
are available for molecular testing. Diagnosis for these patients
is often based on small biopsy samples obtained during
bronchoscopy or percutaneous needle aspiration biopsy
procedures. Limited tumour tissue is obtained in such samples.
A recent study used computer-aided morphometry to measure
tumour area in morphologic sections of 100 bronchial biopsy
samples and found that only 48% of biopsy samples contained
tumour ( 63). Hence if bronchial biopsy samples are to be
used for molecular testing, they should be first stained with
haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and the percentage of tumour
cell content estimated by a pathologist. If the tumour content
is less than 40%, the sample may require microdissection to
augment the tumour cell proportion, a technique likely to
be impractical in the clinical setting ( 64, 65). Such additional
processing steps are constrained by the amount of sample
available.
The nature and purity of tumour in samples used as a source
of DNA for NGS has the potential to profoundly influence
interpretation of the sequencing output. Refinement of
bioinformatic techniques to assess the significance of a somatic
mutation in the context of the factors such as the background
mutation rate, tumour ploidy and stromal contamination for
primary cancers remain a major challenge of NGS ( 20).
Tumour Heterogeneity
Not only is the tumour content of specimens used to source
DNA of great importance, but heterogeneity within tumour
samples can also have a profound impact on NGS results ( 20).
Intertumoral heterogeneity has long been recognised, as
reflected in tumour classification systems based on morphology
and immunohistochemical profiles. Cognisant of intratumoral
heterogeneity, pathologists inspect several tumour sections when
thoroughly examining a specimen. Intratumoral heterogeneity is
particularly prevalent in pulmonary adenocarcinoma, leading to
the recent recommendation by an international expert panel of
quantitation of the predominant and lesser histological patterns
in pathology reports to better predict prognosis and guide
subsequent molecular investigation ( 66). DNA sequencing
studies have provided insight into the molecular basis of this
tumour heterogeneity. In a study of brain metastases from breast
cancer by Ding et al. ( 67), similar sets of coding mutations were
identified in the primary tumour and the metastasis, with gross
differences in allelic frequency. This finding was suggestive of
the presence of small subpopulations of cells with metastatic
potential in the primary tumour.
The presence of subpopulations adds further complexity to
cancer genome sequencing, and requires further investigation
( 68). Intratumoral heterogeneity may influence tumour
aggressiveness, treatment responsiveness and resistance
( 69). Techniques such as macro-dissection or laser capture
microdissection may permit isolation of subpopulations of cells
prior to NGS, thus increasing power to detect mutations present
in only part of the tumour ( 68). It is now possible to sequence
amplified DNA sequences from single cells using NGS ( 70).
Using this technology, it will become plausible to examine DNA
obtained in samples of body fluid such as blood, urine or pleural
fluid to diagnose cancer, and monitor for treatment resistance or
recurrence. |
References
- Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron
W, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2008. Bethesda: National
Cancer Institute. 2011 [cited 2012 Jan 16]. Available online: http://seer.
cancer.gov/csr/1975_2008
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Cancer Australia, Australasian
Association of Cancer Registries. Cancer survival and prevalence in
Australia: cancers diagnosed from 1982 to 2004. Canberra: AIHW; 2008.
- Globocan 2008. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer. c2010
[cited 2012 Jan 15]. Available online: http://globocan.iarc.fr/
- Sanger F, Coulson AR. A rapid method for determining sequences in DNA
by primed synthesis with DNA polymerase. J Mol Biol 1975;94:441-8.[LinkOut]
- Maxam AM, Gilbert W. A new method for sequencing DNA. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A 1977;74:560-4.[LinkOut]
- Reddy EP, Reynolds RK, Santos E, Barbacid M. A point mutation is
responsible for the acquisition of transforming properties by the T24
human bladder carcinoma oncogene. Nature 1982;300:149-52.[LinkOut]
- Tabin CJ, Bradley SM, Bargmann CI, Weinberg RA, Papageorge AG,
Scolnick EM, et al. Mechanism of activation of a human oncogene. Nature
1982;300:143-9.[LinkOut]
- Dulbecco R. A turning point in cancer research: sequencing the human
genome. Science 1986;231:1055-6.[LinkOut]
- Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody MC, Baldwin J,
et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature
2001;409:860-921.[LinkOut]
- Green P. Against a whole-genome shotgun. Genome Res 1997;7:410-7.[LinkOut]
- International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Finishing the
euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature 2004;431:931-45.[LinkOut]
- Paez JG, Jänne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, Gabriel S, et al. EGFR
mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib
therapy. Science 2004;304:1497-500.[LinkOut]
- Soda M, Choi YL, Enomoto M, Takada S, Yamashita Y, Ishikawa S, et al.
Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-smallcell
lung cancer. Nature 2007;448:561-6.[LinkOut]
- Weir BA, Woo MS, Getz G, Perner S, Ding L, Beroukhim R, et al.
Characterizing the cancer genome in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature
2007;450:893-8.[LinkOut]
- Kwak EL, Bang YJ, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, Solomon B, Maki RG, et al.
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer. N
Engl J Med 2010;363:1693-703.[LinkOut]
- Ley TJ, Mardis ER, Ding L, Fulton B, McLellan MD, Chen K, et al. DNA
sequencing of a cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukaemia genome.
Nature 2008;456:66-72.[LinkOut]
- Ng SB, Turner EH, Robertson PD, Flygare SD, Bigham AW, Lee C, et al.
Targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing of 12 human exomes.
Nature 2009;461:272-6.[LinkOut]
- Maher CA, Kumar-Sinha C, Cao X, Kalyana-Sundaram S, Han B, Jing X,
et al. Transcriptome sequencing to detect gene fusions in cancer. Nature
2009;458:97-101.[LinkOut]
- Mardis ER. Next-generation DNA sequencing methods. Annu Rev
Genomics Hum Genet 2008;9:387-402.[LinkOut]
- Meyerson M, Gabriel S, Getz G. Advances in understanding cancer
genomes through second-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet
2010;11:685-96.[LinkOut]
- Ross JS, Cronin M. Whole cancer genome sequencing by next-generation
methods. Am J Clin Pathol 2011;136:527-39.[LinkOut]
- Illumina. Illumina Inc.; c2012 [cited 2012 Jan 20]. Available online: http://
www.illumina.com
- 454 Sequencing. Roche Diagnostics Corporation; c1996-2012 [cited 2012
Jan 20]. Available online: http://www.454.com
- Life Technologies: Applied Biosystems. Life Technologies; c2011 [cited
2012 Jan 20]. Available online: http://www.appliedbiosystems.com.au
- Life Technologies: Ion Torrent. Ion Torrent Systems Inc.; [cited 2012 Jan
20]. Available online: http://www.iontorrent.com
- Rusk N. Torrents of sequence. Nat Methods 2011;8:44.[LinkOut]
- Lee W, Jiang Z, Liu J, Haverty PM, Guan Y, Stinson J, et al. The mutation
spectrum revealed by paired genome sequences from a lung cancer patient.
Nature 2010;465:473-7.[LinkOut]
- Erlich Y, Mitra PP, delaBastide M, McCombie WR, Hannon GJ. Alta-
Cyclic: a self-optimizing base caller for next-generation sequencing. Nat
Methods 2008;5:679-82.[LinkOut]
- Ding L, Wendl MC, Koboldt DC, Mardis ER. Analysis of next-generation
genomic data in cancer: accomplishments and challenges. Hum Mol Genet 2010;19:R188-96.[LinkOut]
- Campbell PJ, Stephens PJ, Pleasance ED, O'Meara S, Li H, Santarius T,
et al. Identification of somatically acquired rearrangements in cancer
using genome-wide massively parallel paired-end sequencing. Nat Genet
2008;40:722-9.[LinkOut]
- Wang K, Kan J, Yuen ST, Shi ST, Chu KM, Law S, et al. Exome sequencing
identifies frequent mutation of ARID1A in molecular subtypes of gastric
cancer. Nat Genet 2011;43:1219-23.[LinkOut]
- Quail MA, Kozarewa I, Smith F, Scally A, Stephens PJ, Durbin R, et al. A
large genome center's improvements to the Illumina sequencing system.
Nat Methods 2008;5:1005-10.[LinkOut]
- Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, et
al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors.
Nature 2005;437:376-80.[LinkOut]
- Fakhrai-Rad H, Pourmand N, Ronaghi M. Pyrosequencing: an accurate
detection platform for single nucleotide polymorphisms. Hum Mutat
2002;19:479-85.[LinkOut]
- Borràs E, Jurado I, Hernan I, Gamundi MJ, Dias M, Martí I, et al. Clinical
pharmacogenomic testing of KRAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations by high
resolution melting analysis and ultra-deep pyrosequencing. BMC Cancer
2011;11:406.[LinkOut]
- Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies - the next generation. Nat Rev
Genet 2010;11:31-46.[LinkOut]
- Kobayashi S, Boggon TJ, Dayaram T, Jänne PA, Kocher O, Meyerson M, et
al. EGFR mutation and resistance of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib.
N Engl J Med 2005;352:786-92.[LinkOut]
- Monzon FA, Ogino S, Hammond ME, Halling KC, Bloom KJ, Nikiforova
MN. The role of KRAS mutation testing in the management of patients
with metastatic colorectal cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009;133:1600-6.[LinkOut]
- Sjöblom T, Jones S, Wood LD, Parsons DW, Lin J, Barber TD, et al. The
consensus coding sequences of human breast and colorectal cancers.
Science 2006;314:268-74.[LinkOut]
- Yassour M, Kaplan T, Fraser HB, Levin JZ, Pfiffner J, Adiconis X, et al.
Ab initio construction of a eukaryotic transcriptome by massively parallel
mRNA sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:3264-9.[LinkOut]
- Mikkelsen TS, Ku M, Jaffe DB, Issac B, Lieberman E, Giannoukos G, et
al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineagecommitted
cells. Nature 2007;448:553-60.[LinkOut]
- Brose MS, Volpe P, Feldman M, Kumar M, Rishi I, Gerrero R, et al. BRAF
and RAS mutations in human lung cancer and melanoma. Cancer Res
2002;62:6997-7000.[LinkOut]
- Pleasance ED, Stephens PJ, O'Meara S, McBride DJ, Meynert A, Jones D,
et al. A small-cell lung cancer genome with complex signatures of tobacco
exposure. Nature 2010;463:184-90.[LinkOut]
- Ju YS, Lee WC, Shin JY, Lee S, Bleazard T, Won JK, et al. A transforming
KIF5B and RET gene fusion in lung adenocarcinoma revealed from wholegenome
and transcriptome sequencing. Genome Res 2012;22:436-45.[LinkOut]
- Greenman C, Stephens P, Smith R, Dalgliesh GL, Hunter C, Bignell G,
et al. Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes. Nature
2007;446:153-8.[LinkOut]
- International Cancer Genome Consortium. International Cancer Genome
Consortium; c2011 [updated 2011 Dec 12, cited 2012 Jan 21]. Available
online: http://www.icgc.org
- The Cancer Genome Project. Bethesda: National Health Institute; [cited
2012 Jan 16]. Available online: http://cancergenome.nih.gov
- Hanauer DA, Rhodes DR, Sinha-Kumar C, et al. Bioinformatics approaches
in the study of cancer. Curr Mol Med 2007;7:133-41.[LinkOut]
- Jackson DB, Sood AK. Personalized cancer medicine--advances and socioeconomic
challenges. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2011;8:735-41.[LinkOut]
- Lander ES. Initial impact of the sequencing of the human genome. Nature
2011;470:187-97.[LinkOut]
- Stratton MR, Campbell PJ, Futreal PA. The cancer genome. Nature
2009;458:719-24.[LinkOut]
- Wang F, Wang L, Briggs C, Sicinska E, Gaston SM, Mamon H, et al. DNA
degradation test predicts success in whole-genome amplification from
diverse clinical samples. J Mol Diagn 2007;9:441-51.[LinkOut]
- Srinivasan M, Sedmak D, Jewell S. Effect of fixatives and tissue processing
on the content and integrity of nucleic acids. Am J Pathol 2002;161:1961-
71.[LinkOut]
- Hewitt SM, Lewis FA, Cao Y, Conrad RC, Cronin M, Danenberg KD, et
al. Tissue handling and specimen preparation in surgical pathology: issues
concerning the recovery of nucleic acids from formalin-fixed, paraffinembedded
tissue. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008;132:1929-35.[LinkOut]
- Tsao MS, Sakurada A, Cutz JC, Zhu CQ, Kamel-Reid S, Squire J, et al.
Erlotinib in lung cancer - molecular and clinical predictors of outcome. N
Engl J Med 2005;353:133-44.[LinkOut]
- Gallegos Ruiz MI, Floor K, Rijmen F, Grünberg K, Rodriguez JA, Giaccone
G. EGFR and K-ras mutation analysis in non-small cell lung cancer:
comparison of paraffin embedded versus frozen specimens. Cell Oncol
2007;29:257-64.[LinkOut]
- Lee W, Jiang Z, Liu J, Haverty PM, Guan Y, Stinson J, et al. The mutation
spectrum revealed by paired genome sequences from a lung cancer patient.
Nature 2010;465:473-7.[LinkOut]
- Campbell PJ, Stephens PJ, Pleasance ED, O'Meara S, Li H, Santarius T,
et al. Identification of somatically acquired rearrangements in cancer
using genome-wide massively parallel paired-end sequencing. Nat Genet
2008;40:722-9.[LinkOut]
- Hoffman PC, Mauer AM, Vokes EE. Lung cancer. Lancet 2000;355:479-85.[LinkOut]
- Marchetti A, Felicioni L, Buttitta F, Tsao MS, Kamel-Reid S, Shepherd FA.
Assessing EGFR Mutations. N Engl J Med 2006;354:526-8.[LinkOut]
- Tsao MS. Should mutational analyses of tumor samples bypass
histopathology? J Thorac Oncol 2007;2:375-6.[LinkOut]
- Wood HM, Belvedere O, Conway C, Daly C, Chalkley R, Bickerdike M,
et al. Using next-generation sequencing for high resolution multiplex
analysis of copy number variation from nanogram quantities of DNA
from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens. Nucleic Acids Res
2010;38:e151.[LinkOut]
- Coghlin CL, Smith LJ, Bakar S, Stewart KN, Devereux GS, Nicolson MC, et
al. Quantitative analysis of tumor in bronchial biopsy specimens. J Thorac
Oncol 2010;5:448-52.[LinkOut]
- Eberhard DA, Giaccone G, Johnson BE; Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Working Group. Biomarkers of response to epidermal growth
factor receptor inhibitors in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Working
Group: standardization for use in the clinical trial setting. J Clin Oncol
2008;26:983-94.[LinkOut]
- John T, Liu G, Tsao MS. Overview of molecular testing in non-small-cell
lung cancer: mutational analysis, gene copy number, protein expression and
other biomarkers of EGFR for the prediction of response to tyrosine kinase
inhibitors. Oncogene 2009;28:S14-23.[LinkOut]
- Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, Nicholson AG, Geisinger KR,
Yatabe Y, et al. International association for the study of lung cancer/
american thoracic society/european respiratory society international
multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol
2011;6:244-85.[LinkOut]
- Ding L, Ellis MJ, Li S, Larson DE, Chen K, Wallis JW, et al. Genome
remodelling in a basal-like breast cancer metastasis and xenograft. Nature
2010;464:999-1005.[LinkOut]
- Russnes HG, Navin N, Hicks J, Borresen-Dale AL. Insight into the
heterogeneity of breast cancer through next-generation sequencing. J Clin
Invest 2011;121:3810-8.[LinkOut]
- Merlo LM, Shah NA, Li X, Blount PL, Vaughan TL, Reid BJ, et al. A
comprehensive survey of clonal diversity measures in Barrett's esophagus as
biomarkers of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Prev Res
(Phila) 2010;3:1388-97.[LinkOut]
- Navin N, Kendall J, Troge J, Andrews P, Rodgers L, McIndoo J, et al. Tumour
evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing. Nature 2011;472:90-4.[LinkOut]
Cite this article as: Daniels M, Goh F, Wright GM, Sriram KB, Relan V,
Clarke BE, Duhig EE, Bowman RV, Yang IA, Fong KM. Whole genome
sequencing for lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 2012;4(2):155-163. doi: 10.3978/
j.issn.2072-1439.2012.02.01
|