Original Article
Diagnosis of pneumocystis pneumonia using serum (1-3)-β-D-Glucan: a bivariate meta-analysis and systematic review
Abstract
Background: The (1-3)-β-D-Glucan (BG) assay has been approved for making a diagnosis of invasive fungal disease. However, the role of serum-BG assay for the diagnosis of pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is controversial, especially between patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and non-HIV. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the difference of the overall accuracy of serum-BG assay for the diagnosis of PCP in immunocompromised patients with and without HIV.
Methods: After a systematic review of English-language studies and manual researching, sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and other measures of accuracy of serum-BG for the diagnosis of PCP were pooled using random-effects models for bivariate meta-analysis. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was used to summarize overall test performance. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the heterogeneity in Se and Sp.
Results: Thirteen studies met our inclusion criteria. The summary estimates for serum-BG assay for definite PCP were as follows: Se, 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88–0.93]; Sp, 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68–0.81). As for the patients with and without HIV, the Se and Sp were 0.92 and 0.78, 0.85 and 0.73, respectively. Significant heterogeneity between Se was presented (P=0.04).
Conclusions: Contrary to the results of the previous meta-analysis, a negative result of serum-BG determination is sufficient for ruling out PCP only in HIV cases. For non-HIV patients, the results should be interpreted in parallel with clinical and radiological findings. Besides, further prospective studies with larger sample size are needed to confirm the diagnosis strategy of BG detection.
Methods: After a systematic review of English-language studies and manual researching, sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and other measures of accuracy of serum-BG for the diagnosis of PCP were pooled using random-effects models for bivariate meta-analysis. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was used to summarize overall test performance. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the heterogeneity in Se and Sp.
Results: Thirteen studies met our inclusion criteria. The summary estimates for serum-BG assay for definite PCP were as follows: Se, 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88–0.93]; Sp, 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68–0.81). As for the patients with and without HIV, the Se and Sp were 0.92 and 0.78, 0.85 and 0.73, respectively. Significant heterogeneity between Se was presented (P=0.04).
Conclusions: Contrary to the results of the previous meta-analysis, a negative result of serum-BG determination is sufficient for ruling out PCP only in HIV cases. For non-HIV patients, the results should be interpreted in parallel with clinical and radiological findings. Besides, further prospective studies with larger sample size are needed to confirm the diagnosis strategy of BG detection.
