The new steel bar in pectus carinatum repair and a review of current methods of correcting chest deformations

The new steel bar in pectus carinatum repair and a review of current methods of correcting chest deformations

Piotr Skrzypczak^, Mariusz Kasprzyk, Cezary Piwkowski

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland

^ORCID: 0000-0002-7056-4472.

Correspondence to: Piotr Skrzypczak, MD. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Szamarzewskiego 62, 60-569 Poznań, Poland. Email:

Comment on: Zhang X, Hu F, Bi R, et al. Minimally invasive repair of pectus carinatum with a new steel bar. J Thorac Dis 2022;14:2781-90.

Submitted Jul 10, 2022. Accepted for publication Jul 28, 2022.

doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-956


In their paper, Zhang and colleagues described the favorable results of correcting the pectus carinatum (PC) after using the new steel bar in the anti-Nuss procedure (1).

Pectus excavatum (PE) and PC are the most common chest wall deformities accounting for more than 95% of all chest wall defects in humans (2,3). PE affects 0.1% of all live births, while PC is less common and occurs in 0.06% (2,3).

The precise etiology of both deformities remains unclear. The main hypotheses are developmental disorder, costal cartilage overgrowth, or genetic predispositions (2). Moreover, PC may frequently accompany certain diseases, such as Marfan disease, homocystinuria, osteogenesis imperfecta, Noonan syndrome, or mitral valve prolapse (4).

A decreased quality of life characterizes patients with either PE or PC in their mental and physical areas (5). Although some PE patients are asymptomatic, others may complain of physical disorders (dyspnoea, chest pain, and palpitations) or psychosocial symptoms (body image concerns and depression) (5-7). Patients with PC mainly suffer from cosmetic issues, resulting in a reduced self-image and a lower quality of life than patients without this deformity (5). Both cosmetic and functional impairments are indications for surgical correction (5-7).


Currently, PE and PC could be repaired with both surgical and conservative methods, which are available. The Nuss procedure is one of PE’s most commonly performed surgical corrections. It is a well-described, effective and safe method, making it the preferred treatment worldwide for children and adults (8-10). The efficiency of the Nuss procedure in PE exceeds 90% and provides favorable long-term cosmetic results (7,11). The perfect age for surgery remains a controversial issue, but many authors prefer to operate the teenagers (7,12).

The papers describing the use of less invasive methods in treating chest wall deformities are also worth mentioning. In PE, an attempt is made to use a vacuum bell, which may provide the cosmetic improvement in some cases, especially in younger patients with mild or moderate deformities (13,14).

The history of modern treatments for PC dates back to 1949 when Ravitch described his technique of removing the abnormal costal cartilage and sternal osteotomy (15). This method has become the standard treatment of PC for the next over 50 years (15).

The disadvantages of this method: extensiveness and the formation of an unaesthetic scar in the medial line of the sternum resulted in the search for less aggressive methods for treating this benign condition. A related point to consider is the recurrence rate after the Ravitch procedure, which could reach even 30% (16-18).

In growing patients, the compressive external bracing is a high-profile, non-invasive PC treatment method that could succeed and help avoid the operation (19,20). In some departments, the results were so favorable that the brace therapy was introduced as a first-line treatment for PC, followed by surgery once the effect was not satisfying (21).

In 2005, Abramson described the minimally invasive surgical technique for correcting PC first in Spanish (22) and later in English (23). In the next 15 years, the minimally-invasive techniques such as the Abramson procedure (or reversed Nuss procedure) (23) have gained in popularity and are frequently performed as the alternative to the more extensive Ravitch procedure. It should be emphasized that the Ravitch method involves a significant interference with the thoracic skeleton (15), in contrast to the Abramson method, which is essentially based on the compression effect (22). According to Abramson (22), the most challenging part of the operation is the subpectoral bar placement, requiring a PVC tube with a trocar during dissection. Therefore, the authors of this procedure’s modifications decided to use the two curved Doyen intestinal clamps to prepare a submuscular tunnel (24).

The new steel bar

Zhang et al. used a novel steel bar type in the anti- Nuss procedure (1). The main modification was the bar’s composition, consisting of three parts with different elasticities. According to the authors, such a structure significantly increases its plasticity and makes it easier to design the shape of the bar for the patient’s deformity type. As the authors reported, removing the newly designed bar was less time-consuming and traumatic for the patient. From a practical point of view, another significant advantage of this new bar is the ability to modify the steel bar’s shape further, even once it is placed in the body.

Furthermore, the newly designed stabilizer and multiple wires enabled the authors to stabilize the bar firmly and reduce the number of complications related to its displacement. The satisfaction of patients was confirmed by using the questionnaires in the follow-up. The idea of this paper fits perfectly into performing the beneficial modifications of the thoracic deformation procedures: simplifying them, individualizing the therapy to a type of deformation, and ensuring maximum safety.

Considering that most patients are children and young adults, it is tempting to hypothesize that modifications of available techniques: reducing scarring, postoperative pain, and the risk of other complications, will be of increasing interest to patients and doctors in the following years (25). The availability of various treatment methods also allows for a wider choice and better adaptation of the method to the type of deformation. Therefore, the presented paper creates a background for the future, further attempts would compare various types of steel bars and minimally invasive methods, as well as evaluate their effectiveness with the emerging reports on the possibilities of non-invasive treatment of chest wall deformations.


Funding: None.


Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Journal of Thoracic Disease. The article did not undergo external peer review.

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See:


  1. Zhang X, Hu F, Bi R, et al. Minimally invasive repair of pectus carinatum with a new steel bar. J Thorac Dis 2022;14:2781-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Brochhausen C, Turial S, Müller FK, et al. Pectus excavatum: history, hypotheses and treatment options. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012;14:801-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. McHam B, Winkler L. Pectus Carinatum (Pigeon Chest). In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019.
  4. Robicsek F, Watts LT. Pectus carinatum. Thorac Surg Clin 2010;20:563-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Steinmann C, Krille S, Mueller A, et al. Pectus excavatum and pectus carinatum patients suffer from lower quality of life and impaired body image: a control group comparison of psychological characteristics prior to surgical correction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40:1138-45. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Fonkalsrud EW. Management of pectus chest deformities in female patients. Am J Surg 2004;187:192-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Pawlak K, Gąsiorowski Ł, Gabryel P, et al. Early and Late Results of the Nuss Procedure in Surgical Treatment of Pectus Excavatum in Different Age Groups. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;102:1711-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Hanna WC, Ko MA, Blitz M, et al. Thoracoscopic Nuss procedure for young adults with pectus excavatum: excellent midterm results and patient satisfaction. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:1033-6; discussion 1037-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Johnson WR, Fedor D, Singhal S. Systematic review of surgical treatment techniques for adult and pediatric patients with pectus excavatum. J Cardiothorac Surg 2014;9:25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Roberts J, Hayashi A, Anderson JO, et al. Quality of life of patients who have undergone the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum: Preliminary findings. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:779-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Nuss D, Kelly RE Jr, Croitoru DP, et al. A 10-year review of a minimally invasive technique for the correction of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:545-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Farronato A, Ghionzoli M, Messineo A, et al. Pectus excavatum in adolescents and children: the Nuss technique. Pediatr Med 2019;2:32. [Crossref]
  13. Obermeyer RJ, Cohen NS, Kelly RE Jr, et al. Nonoperative management of pectus excavatum with vacuum bell therapy: A single center study. J Pediatr Surg 2018;53:1221-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. St-Louis E, Miao J, Emil S, et al. Vacuum bell treatment of pectus excavatum: An early North American experience. J Pediatr Surg 2019;54:194-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Ravitch MM. The Operative Treatment of Pectus Excavatum. Ann Surg 1949;129:429-44. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Kelly RE, Goretsky MJ, Obermeyer R, et al. Twenty-one years of experience with minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum by the Nuss procedure in 1215 patients. Ann Surg 2010;252:1072-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Ellis DG, Snyder CL, Mann CM. The 're-do' chest wall deformity correction. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32:1267-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Tikka T, Steyn R, Bishay E, et al. Short and long term outcomes of pectus surgery. Eur Respir J 2015;46:OA1741.
  19. Martinez-Ferro M, Bellia Munzon G, Fraire C, et al. Non-surgical treatment of pectus carinatum with the FMF® Dynamic Compressor System. J Vis Surg. 2016;2:57. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Suh JW, Joo S, Lee GD, et al. Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Carinatum in Patients Unsuited to Bracing Therapy. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;49:92-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Jung J, Chung SH, Cho JK, et al. Brace compression for treatment of pectus carinatum. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;45:396-400. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Abramson H. A minimally invasive technique to repair pectus carinatum. Preliminary report. Arch Bronconeumol 2005;41:349-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. Abramson H, D'Agostino J, Wuscovi S. A 5-year experience with a minimally invasive technique for pectus carinatum repair. J Pediatr Surg 2009;44:118-23; discussion 123-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  24. Özkaya M, Bilgin M. Minimally invasive repair of pectus carinatum by modification of the Abramson technique. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2018;13:383-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  25. Skrzypczak P, Kamiński M, Pawlak K, et al. Seasonal interest in pectus excavatum and pectus carinatum: a retrospective analysis of Google Trends data. J Thorac Dis 2021;13:1036-44. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Skrzypczak P, Kasprzyk M, Piwkowski C. The new steel bar in pectus carinatum repair and a review of current methods of correcting chest deformations. J Thorac Dis 2022;14(10):3671-3673. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-956

Download Citation