Intraoperative molecular imaging in thoracic oncology: pushing the boundaries of precision resection for occult non-small cell lung cancer in the era of minimally invasive surgery
Editorial

Intraoperative molecular imaging in thoracic oncology: pushing the boundaries of precision resection for occult non-small cell lung cancer in the era of minimally invasive surgery

Feredun Azari1,2^, Gregory T. Kennedy1,2, Patrick Bou-Samra1, Sunil Singhal1,2

1Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 2Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

^ORCID: 0000-0002-5907-8158.

Correspondence to: Feredun Azari, MD. Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 4 Maloney, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Email: feredun.azari@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Comment on: Chiba R, Ebihara Y, Shiiya H, et al. A novel system for analyzing indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence spectra enables deeper lung tumor localization during thoracoscopic surgery. J Thorac Dis 2022;14:2943-52.


Submitted Aug 10, 2022. Accepted for publication Sep 02, 2022.

doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-1100


In the recent paper entitled “A novel system for analyzing indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence spectra enables deeper lung tumor localization during thoracoscopic surgery”, Chiba and colleagues utilize a novel near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy device that aims to detect nonpalpable and visually occult pulmonary nodules with various well thought-out preclinical and porcine models (1). They describe reliable detection of ICG-labeled tumors as deep as 30 mm from the pleural surface in inflated lungs with their technique, which is an important principle for minimally invasive intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI)-guided cancer resections (2).

The authors’ findings are timely and relevant. The rapid adoption and implementation of low-dose CT-based lung cancer screening techniques have led to a substantial increase in the incidence of indeterminate subcentimeter solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) and ground glass opacities (3-5). While the majority of these nodules are benign, clinicians must do diligence in evaluating and longitudinal follow-up, as this patient population represents a high-risk group (6,7). Unfortunately, a substantial number of patients with SPNs need tissue sampling in the form of surgical resection for definitive diagnosis and treatment. However, in the era of minimally invasive techniques such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS), these lesions present a significant challenge to the surgeon, as they tend to be visually occult, which can lead to higher than desired pulmonary resection for potentially benign disease processes (8).

IMI has emerged as a potential technology that addresses these current challenges in thoracic surgery (9-13). IMI involves the systemic infusion of targeted fluorochrome that localizes to the area of the tumor and can be detected using camera systems that are specifically designed for the tracer in question. By leveraging IMI, surgeons can make areas of tracer accumulation (theoretically area containing only the tumor) “glow” and use the tumor fluorescence as a guide for resection.

Chiba et al. described a well-studied NIR fluorochrome, ICG, which has long been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and is a subject of hundreds of clinical trials (9,14-16). ICG has excitation and emission in the NIR spectrum (>800 nm) and is not visible to the naked eye, therefore requiring an NIR emission camera detection system. This injected nontargeted fluorescent tracer accumulates passively in tumors via the enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR). This mechanism leverages the increased vascular permeability and decreased lymphatic drainage characteristic of cancerous tissue, which causes the tracer to accumulate inside the tumor. Other notable tracers that exploit EPR include methylene blue (long used in preoperative pulmonary nodule localization) and fluorescein (17,18).

Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated the oncologic benefit of various IMIs, particularly for lung cancer resections (9,19). The use of this technology has been associated with superior visually occult primary nodule detection, intraoperative margin assessment, and synchronous occult disease identification, which have been missed by even high-resolution cross-sectional imaging (9). The benefit of the technology goes beyond primary lung nodules, as IMI has been shown to detect occult metastatic pulmonary sarcomas and influence patient survival after IMI-guided metastasectomy (10). Similar observations have been noted for other malignancies, such as melanoma and colorectal and renal cell carcinoma, that metastasize to the lung (13).

Despite the many advantages and benefits of IMI, the technology still remains in its infancy and faces various technical and operational challenges (2,20,21). The majority of the current fluorescence tracers investigated are in the NIR range. The Achilles heel of operating at this wavelength (800–1,000 nm) is that it limits the depth of penetration of the tracer excitation and fluorescence detection (22). Currently, various studies report suboptimal detection of nodules deeper than 10 mm from the pleural surface. Chiba and associates, in this study, attempt to address this significant challenge by implementing a novel ICG fluorescence calibrated spectroscopy device that has tissue penetration deeper than NIR light-source enabled IMI devices. Using calculated and astute preclinical investigative methods, the authors describe ICG fluorescence detection well beyond the current capabilities of ex vivo systems (1). This finding has the potential to expand the patient population that can benefit from IMI assistance during minimally invasive resections.

There are several limitations to this study that should be acknowledged, many of which Chiba and associates do carefully consider in their discussion. First, the implementation and validation of the spectroscopic detection of ICG fluorescence is performed entirely in biological silicone and porcine lung modules. While these platforms allow for the spectrophotophysical assessment of NIR tracers and detection devices, they are only crudely representative of findings in humans. Lungs represent a particularly challenging solid organ system for the study of IMI. The organs in situ are dynamic due to respiratory variation and are routinely anthracotic due to light absorbing carbon deposition (soot), which produces false fluorescence and has higher normal parenchymal uptake of ICG secondary to rich vasculature (21,23). Any claim without investigation in human clinical trials should be interpreted cautiously in the field of IMI, as countless technological discoveries fail to make clinical impact once introduced into humans. Second, for IMI to be successful and clinically impactful, the technology has to be rapidly scalable and intuitive. While the novel device described by Chiba et al. is impressive, it is unclear if the spectroscopic interpretation would be adopted by the wider thoracic surgery community. The technology has to seamlessly integrate into current surgical management, such as VATS and RATS camera systems, and not disturb the clinical momentum of the surgical team (15).

In conclusion, the description and careful experimental curation by Chiba et al. serve an important leap in addressing the current challenges in IMI. Future clinical assessment of their novel spectral systems in early phase trials will surely attempt to answer the limitations outlined in their manuscript.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Journal of Thoracic Disease. The article did not undergo external peer review.

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-22-1100/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Chiba R, Ebihara Y, Shiiya H, et al. A novel system for analyzing indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence spectra enables deeper lung tumor localization during thoracoscopic surgery. J Thorac Dis 2022;14:2943-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Azari F, Kennedy G, Bernstein E, et al. Evaluation of OTL38-Generated Tumor-to-Background Ratio in Intraoperative Molecular Imaging-Guided Lung Cancer Resections. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; Epub ahead of print. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, et al. Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA 2012;307:2418-29. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Young RP, Hopkins RJ. Measures of outcome in lung cancer screening: maximising the benefits. J Thorac Dis 2016;8:E1317-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. US Preventive Services Task Force [Internet]. Final Recommendation Statement. Lung Cancer: Screening. [cited 2020 Jan 20]. Available online: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementFinal/lung-cancer-screening
  6. Albert RH, Russell JJ. Evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Am Fam Physician 2009;80:827-31. [PubMed]
  7. Chilet-Rosell E, Parker LA, Hernández-Aguado I, et al. The determinants of lung cancer after detecting a solitary pulmonary nodule are different in men and women, for both chest radiograph and CT. PLoS One 2019;14:e0221134. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Azari F, Kennedy G, Singhal S. Intraoperative Detection and Assessment of Lung Nodules. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2020;29:525-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Azari F, Kennedy G, Bernstein E, et al. Intraoperative molecular imaging clinical trials: a review of 2020 conference proceedings. J Biomed Opt 2021.
  10. Azari F, Kennedy GT, Zhang K, et al. Impact of Intraoperative Molecular Imaging after Fluorescent-Guided Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Sarcoma. J Am Coll Surg 2022;234:748-58. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Kennedy GT, Azari FS, Bernstein E, et al. Targeted Intraoperative Molecular Imaging for Localizing Nonpalpable Tumors and Quantifying Resection Margin Distances. JAMA Surg 2021;156:1043-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Kennedy GT, Azari FS, Bernstein E, et al. 3D Specimen Mapping Expedites Frozen Section Diagnosis of Nonpalpable Ground Glass Opacities. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; Epub ahead of print. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Azari F, Kennedy GT, Chang A, et al. Glycoprotein Receptor CEACAM5-Targeted Intraoperative Molecular Imaging Tracer in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2022; Epub ahead of print. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Zeh R, Sheikh S, Xia L, et al. The second window ICG technique demonstrates a broad plateau period for near infrared fluorescence tumor contrast in glioblastoma. PLoS One 2017;12:e0182034. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Ferrari-Light D, Geraci TC, Sasankan P, et al. The Utility of Near-Infrared Fluorescence and Indocyanine Green During Robotic Pulmonary Resection. Front Surg 2019;6:47. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Predina JD, Newton AD, Corbett C, et al. A Clinical Trial of TumorGlow to Identify Residual Disease During Pleurectomy and Decortication. Ann Thorac Surg 2019;107:224-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Keating J, Singhal S. Novel Methods of Intraoperative Localization and Margin Assessment of Pulmonary Nodules. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;28:127-36. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Azari F, Zhang K, Kennedy GT, et al. State of the Art: Precision Surgery Guided by Intraoperative Molecular Imaging. J Nucl Med 2022; Epub ahead of print. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Kennedy GT, Azari FS, Bernstein E, et al. Targeted detection of cancer at the cellular level during biopsy by near-infrared confocal laser endomicroscopy. Nat Commun 2022;13:2711. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Azari F, Kennedy G, Chang A, et al. Presence of non-Newtonian fluid in invasive pulmonary mucinous adenocarcinomas impacts fluorescence during intraoperative molecular imaging of lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; Epub ahead of print. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Azari F, Kennedy G, Zhang K, et al. Effects of Light-absorbing Carbons in Intraoperative Molecular Imaging-Guided Lung Cancer Resections. Mol Imaging Biol 2022; Epub ahead of print. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Chi C, Du Y, Ye J, et al. Intraoperative imaging-guided cancer surgery: from current fluorescence molecular imaging methods to future multi-modality imaging technology. Theranostics 2014;4:1072-84. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. Newton AD, Predina JD, Nie S, et al. Intraoperative fluorescence imaging in thoracic surgery. J Surg Oncol 2018;118:344-55. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Azari F, Kennedy GT, Bou-Samra P, Singhal S. Intraoperative molecular imaging in thoracic oncology: pushing the boundaries of precision resection for occult non-small cell lung cancer in the era of minimally invasive surgery. J Thorac Dis 2022;14(10):3688-3691. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-1100

Download Citation