Clinical implication of coronary artery bypass graft with surgical ventricular reconstruction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction in the current clinical practice
Letter to the Editor

Clinical implication of coronary artery bypass graft with surgical ventricular reconstruction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction in the current clinical practice

Kousuke Akao, Teruhiko Imamura

Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan

Correspondence to: Teruhiko Imamura, MD, PhD, FAHA, FACC, FESC, FHFSA, FAPSC, FACP, FICA, FASA, FICS, FJCS, FJCC. Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, Japan. Email: teimamu@med.u-toyama.ac.jp.

Comment on: Yang T, Yuan X, Li B, et al. Long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft with or without surgical ventricular reconstruction in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. J Thorac Dis 2023;15:1627-39.


Submitted Jun 19, 2023. Accepted for publication Jul 21, 2023. Published online Aug 01, 2023.

doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-971


The therapeutic strategy for the patients with chronic myocardial infarction and severe left ventricular dysfunction remains controversial. Yang and colleagues compared clinical outcomes between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and surgical ventricular reconstruction (SVR) and isolated CABG without SVR. They showed that CABG + SVR was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of cardiovascular events than isolated CABG (1). Several concerns have been raised.

In the literature to date, the clinical benefit of CABG + SVR over isolated CABG remains controversial. In a large randomized control trial, CABG + SVR was not associated with a greater reduction in the rate of death or cardiac hospitalization than isolated CABG (2). How do the authors explain this discrepancy? Optimal patient selection may be a key to successful CABG + SVR surgery. Several risk models have been proposed to predict postoperative survival (3).

In their study, some patients did not receive concomitant SVR but received CABG alone, despite being eligible for CABG + SVR (1). What was the indication for isolated CABG at the authors’ institution? Although baseline characteristics were not statistically different between the two groups, statistical attempts to adjust for the potential confounders should have been considered, including propensity score matching or multivariable analysis.

In their study, it appears that all isolated CABG was performed under on-pump (1). On-pump beating-heart CABG and off-pump CABG are recently-introduced promising alternatives to on-pump CABG, especially in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (4). How did the authors choose the surgical procedure for isolated CABG?

Optimal medical therapy is another key to successful reverse remodeling (5). Which medications did the patients in their study receive after the surgery? Their study was carried out between 2010 and 2013 (1). Currently, several new anti-heart failure medications are clinically available, including SGLT2 inhibitors, sacubitril/valsartan, and vericiguat. How do the authors consider the impact of their findings on the current clinical practice?


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was a standard submission to the journal. The article did not undergo external peer review.

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-971/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Yang T, Yuan X, Li B, et al. Long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft with or without surgical ventricular reconstruction in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. J Thorac Dis 2023;15:1627-39. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Jones RH, Velazquez EJ, Michler RE, et al. Coronary bypass surgery with or without surgical ventricular reconstruction. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1705-17. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Wakasa S, Matsui Y, Isomura T, et al. Risk scores for predicting mortality after surgical ventricular reconstruction for ischemic cardiomyopathy: results of a Japanese multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;147:1868-74, 1874.e1-2.
  4. Xia L, Ji Q, Song K, et al. Early clinical outcomes of on-pump beating-heart versus off-pump technique for surgical revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: the experience of a single center. J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;12:11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2022;145:e895-1032. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Akao K, Imamura T. Clinical implication of coronary artery bypass graft with surgical ventricular reconstruction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction in the current clinical practice. J Thorac Dis 2023;15(8):4544-4545. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-971

Download Citation