The elephant trunk procedure continues to evolve 40 years since its initial description
Editorial

The elephant trunk procedure continues to evolve 40 years since its initial description

Sameer Thakur1, George Asimakopoulos1, Ioannis Dimarakis2

1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; 2Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA

Correspondence to: Ioannis Dimarakis, MD, PhD, MEBCTS, FRCS, CTh. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific Street Box #356410, Seattle, WA 98195-6410, USA. Email: ijd22@uw.edu.

Comment on: Ho JYK, Kim CH, Chow SCY, et al. Initial Asian experience of the branched E-vita open NEO in complex aortic pathologies. J Thorac Dis 2023;15:484-93.


Keywords: Aortic arch surgery; stented graft; frozen elephant trunk (FET); surgical technique


Submitted Oct 15, 2023. Accepted for publication Nov 16, 2023. Published online Dec 21, 2023.

doi: 10.21037/jtd-2023-15


Initially introduced by Borst and colleagues in 1983, a two-staged operation (conventional elephant trunk procedure via a median sternotomy followed by lateral thoracotomy) was the standard approach for the surgical repair of arch and distal aortic aneurysms (1). The landscape of complex aortic arch pathology treatment was subsequently impacted tremendously by the advent of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique (2-4). The procedure can be performed as a single stage operation through a median sternotomy, or even partial sternotomy, with varying degrees of lower hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA). The recent paradigm shift of FET proximalization from zone 3 to zone 2 appears to be associated with a more favorable complication profile (5). Some groups are also describing proximal fixation within zone 0 and 1, which allows for an easier distal anastomosis, particularly when using the trifurcated stent grafts (6).

Within Europe, two hybrid prostheses are available on the market: E-Vita Open (Artivion, Kennesaw, GA, USA) and the Thoraflex hybrid device (Vascutek Terumo, Inchinnan, Scotland, UK). Elsewhere two other FETs are commercially available: the Cronus (MicroPort, Shanghai, China) and the J graft (Japan Lifeline, Tokyo, Japan). Device design consists of a proximal Dacron surgical graft and a distal reinforced covered stent graft designed to seal in the descending thoracic aorta (DTA), connected by a cuff to which the distal arch anastomosis is sutured. If further or subsequent endovascular reintervention is required, the stent-graft component may provide a landing zone for the distal extension. Furthermore, and particularly in the setting of acute aortic dissection, the FET technique has been associated with a reduction in residual patency of the false lumen whilst encouraging aortic wall remodeling (7).

Ho et al. are to be congratulated on their initial experience of the branched E-vita open NEO (8). Over a 12-month period involving 25 patients across two centres, zero mortality and stroke was achieved, and 8% spinal cord injury. Previous studies have reported rates of up to 10.2%, 7.7% and 6.5% for 30-day-mortality, stroke, or spinal cord injury, respectively (7). This reinforces a primary concern for the use of any hybrid stent graft prosthesis, which is spinal cord injury. In their experience, the cohort of patients at Gangnam Severance Hospital (GSH) had the length of the stent graft chosen such that the distal landing zone was located above T8–T10, while at Prince of Wales Hospital (PWH), the distal landing was planned superior to T8. Overall, 32% of patients had the extent of coverage at or distal to T8. Whilst only a small number, the two patients who suffered spinal cord injury were from the PWH. Furthermore, the mean length of stent graft was longer at GSH compared to PWH (137.7 vs. 128.7 mm), and across both sites most distal anastomotic sites were in zone 2. It is difficult then to determine the exact aetiology of the spinal cord injury, as this may be a result of a multifactorial process; lower body circulatory arrest time, level of hypothermia achieved, atherosclerotic disease or the native aorta, embolization of debris, and adjunctive neuroprotective methods such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure monitoring and lumbar drainage systems.

In a joint position paper on the management of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch (9), the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and European Society for Vascular Surgery have recommended FET to be considered in patients with acute type A aortic dissection with a primary entry in the distal aortic arch or in the proximal half of the DTA to treat associated malperfusion syndrome or to avoid its postoperative development; in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection to prevent mid-term aneurysmal formation in the downstream aorta; in patients with complicated acute type B aortic dissection when endovascular interventions are contraindicated; and in patients with concomitant distal thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic disease that, in a later stage, will or is likely to require either surgical or endovascular treatment. Despite large institutional experience being gained across many centers (10), the aortic community continues to decipher the intricacies of this technique (11).

Ho et al.’s report on their experience with the branched E-vita open NEO, as published recently in the Journal of Thoracic Disease adds considerable weight to the current landscape of management of complex aortic arch pathology with a novel hybrid stent graft device. Long-term metrics regarding survival, quality of life improvement as well as cost-effectiveness remain overall scarce. Although the short-term results are reassuring, we look forward to longer term follow-up, which will further strengthen this ever-evolving area in cardiac and aortic surgery.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Journal of Thoracic Disease. The article did not undergo external peer review.

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-2023-15/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Borst HG, Walterbusch G, Schaps D. Extensive aortic replacement using "elephant trunk" prosthesis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;31:37-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Suto Y, Yasuda K, Shiiya N, et al. Stented elephant trunk procedure for an extensive aneurysm involving distal aortic arch and descending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:1389-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Kato M, Ohnishi K, Kaneko M, et al. New graft-implanting method for thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection with a stented graft. Circulation 1996;94:II188-93.
  4. Karck M, Chavan A, Hagl C, et al. The frozen elephant trunk technique: a new treatment for thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1550-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Choudhury RY, Basharat K, Zahra SA, et al. "Proximalization is Advancement"-Zone 3 Frozen Elephant Trunk vs Zone 2 Frozen Elephant Trunk: A Literature Review. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2021;55:612-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Lee KFL, Bhatia I, Chan TLD, et al. Proximalization of Frozen Elephant Trunk Procedure: Zone 0 or 1 versus Zone 2 or 3 Arch Repair. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; Epub ahead of print. [Crossref]
  7. Tian DH, Wan B, Di Eusanio M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the safety and efficacy of the frozen elephant trunk technique in aortic arch surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2013;2:581-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Ho JYK, Kim CH, Chow SCY, et al. Initial Asian experience of the branched E-vita open NEO in complex aortic pathologies. J Thorac Dis 2023;15:484-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Czerny M, Schmidli J, Adler S, et al. Current options and recommendations for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch: an expert consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic surgery (EACTS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;55:133-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Lin H, Chang Y, Zhou H, et al. Early results of frozen elephant trunk in acute type-A dissection in 1445 patients. Int J Cardiol 2023;389:131213. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Misfeld M, Marin-Cuartas M, Ramirez P, et al. Early Intraluminal Frozen Elephant Trunk Stent Graft Thrombosis After Aortic Arch Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2023;116:450-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Thakur S, Asimakopoulos G, Dimarakis I. The elephant trunk procedure continues to evolve 40 years since its initial description. J Thorac Dis 2023;15(12):6405-6407. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2023-15

Download Citation