Impact of family history of cancer on development of lung cancer among the Korean population: a prospective cohort study using KoGES data
Letter to the Editor

Impact of family history of cancer on development of lung cancer among the Korean population: a prospective cohort study using KoGES data

Sang Hyuk Kim1#^, Hyun Lee2#^, Bo-Guen Kim2^, Sang-Heon Kim2^, Jang Won Sohn2^, Ho Joo Yoon2^, Dong Won Park2^

1Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Gyeongju Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Gyeongju, Korea; 2Division of Pulmonary Medicine and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

#These authors contributed equally to this work.

^ORCID: Sang Hyuk Kim, 0000-0002-0410-8524; Hyun Lee, 0000-0002-1269-0913; Bo-Guen Kim, 0000-0003-0800-4324; Sang-Heon Kim, 0000-0001-8398-4444; Jang Won Sohn, 0000-0001-7132-2988; Ho Joo Yoon, 0000-0002-4645-4863; Dong Won Park, 0000-0002-4538-6045.

Correspondence to: Dong Won Park, MD, PhD. Division of Pulmonary Medicine and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, 222-1, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Korea. Email: dongwonpark@hanyang.ac.kr.

Submitted Jul 11, 2023. Accepted for publication Jan 12, 2024. Published online Feb 27, 2024.

doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1077


Several studies have indicated a potential link between a family history of cancer, particularly lung cancer, and an increased risk of developing lung cancer (1-3). However, the impact of a history of specific types of cancer on lung cancer risk remains uncertain (4). Confirming this association is crucial to improve the accuracy of lung cancer prediction and to identify groups at high risk to enable timely lung cancer screening (5). Hence, this study aimed to investigate the connection between a family history of cancer in first-degree relatives (FDRs) and the risk of lung cancer in the Korean population by assessing the family history of cancer (lung cancer and others) in individuals with and without lung cancer.

We used cohort data from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES). Detailed information was reported in a previous study (6,7). Of a total of 211,562 individuals, we excluded 10,030 without data regarding a family history of cancer and 1,672 with missing values in smoking status. Of the remaining, 68,632 individuals aged younger than 50 years were further excluded. Finally, 131,228 individuals were included in the final analyses.

Family history of cancers in FDRs and the presence of lung cancer were assessed using questionnaires. A recent study suggested that a family history of lung cancer may have a more pronounced influence on the risk of lung cancer than a family history of other types of cancers (4). Given this evidence, we placed greater emphasis on investigating the impact of a family history of lung cancer. We classified the family history of FDRs into two categories: lung cancer and cancers other than lung cancer (hereafter referred to as other cancers). We also evaluated the risk of lung cancer based on the number of FDRs with a history of cancer (single vs. multiple) to explore potential associations between the number of affected relatives and the risk of developing lung cancer. Furthermore, considering smoking as a well-established risk factor for lung cancer, we performed subgroup analysis for sex and smoking status to determine potential genetic susceptibility factors that may contribute to the development of lung cancer in the absence of smoking-related factors.

Multivariable logistic analysis was performed to determine the association between a family history of cancer and the development of lung cancer. Age, sex, and smoking status (current, former, and never) were used as covariates. However, in the subgroup analysis, it was not possible to adjust for sex in the ever-smoker subgroup and smoking status in the female subgroup due to the limited number of lung cancer cases. All analyses were performed using R version 4.1.3 (R core Team 2020; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Of 131,228 individuals, the numbers of individuals with a family history of cancers were as follows: (I) 4,555 (3.5%) individuals with a family history of lung cancer; (II) 23,155 (17.6%) individuals with a family history of other cancers; (III) 24,471 (18.6%) individuals with a family history of single cancer; and (IV) 3,239 (2.5%) individuals with a family history of multiple cancers. Out of the total, there were 135 (0.1%) cases of lung cancer, distributed as 9 (0.2%) out of 4,555 in those with a family history of lung cancer, 32 (0.1%) out of 23,155 in those with a family history of other cancers, 34 (0.1%) out of 24,471 in those with a family history of single cancer, and 7 (0.2%) out of 3,239 in those with a family history of multiple cancers. Among individuals without any family history of cancer, there were 94 (0.1%) cases of lung cancer out of 103,424.

As shown in Table 1, a family history of lung cancer significantly increased the risk of lung cancer [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) =2.51, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.26–4.99]. A family history of other cancers was also associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (aOR =1.74, 95% CI: 1.16–2.60). Additionally, regardless of the number of FDRs with a family history of cancer, a family history of cancer increased the risk of lung cancer. Although not statistically significant, the odds of developing lung cancer were approximately 1.7 (95% CI: 0.74–3.78) times higher for individuals with a family history of multiple cancers (aOR =2.90, 95% CI: 1.34–6.28) than those with a family history of single cancer (aOR =1.74, 95% CI: 1.17–2.58).

Table 1

Odds ratios for risk of lung cancer by family history of any cancer

Family history of cancer in FDRs Risk of lung cancer
Unadjusted Adjusted
OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P value
Total population (n=131,228)
   No family history of cancer Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
   Lung cancer 2.18 1.10–4.32 0.026* 2.51 1.26–4.99 0.007*
   Cancer other than lung cancer 1.55 1.02–2.27 0.040* 1.74 1.16–2.60 0.009*
   Single, any 1.53 1.03–2.27 0.034* 1.74 1.17–2.58 0.006*
   Multiple, any 2.38 1.10–5.14 0.027* 2.90 1.34–6.28 0.007*
Gender
   Female (n=83,478)
      Lung cancer 4.18 1.74–10.03 0.001* 4.44 1.85–10.68 <0.001*
      Cancer other than lung cancer 1.35 0.66–2.76 0.408 1.43 0.70–2.92 0.329
      Single, any 1.55 0.80–3.02 0.197 1.64 0.84–3.20 0.148
      Multiple, any 3.65 1.29–10.34 0.015* 3.87 1.36–11.00 0.011*
   Male (n=47,750)
      Lung cancer 1.76 1.09–2.87 0.022* 1.92 1.18–3.14 0.009*
      Cancer other than lung cancer 1.19 0.37–3.80 0.768 1.34 0.42–4.28 0.622
      Single, any 1.63 1.01–2.66 0.048* 1.79 1.10–2.92 0.020*
      Multiple, any 1.96 0.62–6.26 0.255 2.17 0.68–6.96 0.192
Smoking history
   Never-smoker (n=94,669)
Lung cancer 3.48 1.47–8.22 0.005* 3.77 1.59–8.93 0.003*
      Cancer other than lung cancer 1.22 0.63–2.39 0.553 1.31 0.67–2.57 0.426
      Single, any 1.38 0.74–2.59 0.313 1.48 0.79–2.78 0.222
      Multiple, any 3.09 1.10–8.66 0.032* 3.37 1.20–9.47 0.021*
   Ever-smoker (n=36,559)
      Lung cancer 1.26 0.39–4.04 0.695 1.56 0.49–5.01 0.455
      Cancer other than lung cancer 1.85 1.12–3.06 0.017* 2.21 1.33–3.67 0.002*
      Single, any 1.71 1.03–2.83 0.037* 2.04 1.23–3.40 0.006*
      Multiple, any 2.07 0.65–6.63 0.221 2.60 0.81–8.36 0.109

*, indicates statistical significance. FDRs, first-degree relatives; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

In subgroup analysis, family histories of lung cancer and multiple cancers were associated with an increased risk of lung cancer among females and never-smokers. Specifically, in females, the odds of developing lung cancer were significantly higher for those with a family history of lung cancer (aOR =4.44, 95% CI: 1.85–10.68), and the same was true for multiple cancers (aOR =3.87, 95% CI: 1.36–11.00). Among never-smokers, the risk of developing lung cancer was significantly elevated for individuals with a family history of lung cancer (aOR =3.77, 95% CI: 1.59–8.93) and multiple cancers (aOR =3.37, 95% CI: 1.20–9.47). However, in ever-smokers, family histories of other cancers and single cancers were associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (aOR =2.21, 95% CI: 1.33–3.67 for other cancers; aOR =2.04, 95% CI: 1.23–3.40 for single cancers). Among males, only family histories of lung cancer and single cancer were associated with a significantly increased risk of lung cancer (aOR =1.92, 95% CI: 1.18–3.14 for lung cancer; aOR =1.79, 95% CI: 1.10–2.92).

Our study findings support previous research (1,4) by confirming that a family history of lung cancer is associated with an elevated risk of developing lung cancer. Moreover, we observed that a family history of cancers other than lung cancers also increased the likelihood of developing lung cancer. Irrespective of the number of affected relatives, a family history of cancer in FDRs contributed to an increased risk of lung cancer, with a greater impact in cases with multiple cancers. These results emphasize the need for personalized approaches to lung cancer screening rather than relying solely on a single criterion. To ensure early detection of lung cancer through precision medicine, it is crucial to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of a patient’s family history of cancer in FDRs, along with considering other relevant clinical factors (8). This approach will help guide the decision-making process for lung cancer screening.

The impact of a family history of cancer in FDR on the risk of lung cancer varies by subgroup. Particularly, the role of family history of lung cancer appears to be less prominent among ever-smokers, indicating that smoking plays a more dominant role in the development of lung cancer in this population than do genetic factors. However, in other subgroups, such as females or never-smokers, a family history of lung cancer was consistently correlated with an increased risk of lung cancer. Therefore, it is imperative to conduct further research to evaluate the effectiveness of lung cancer screening, specifically in those individuals without a smoking history but with a family history of lung cancer in FDRs.

The limitation of this study is that the number of individuals with lung cancer was too small to draw definitive conclusions. Thus, future studies involving a larger number of participants are necessary to validate and strengthen our findings. Moreover, important characteristics of lung cancer, such as its pathology and types like primary, recurrent, and metastatic lung cancer, could not be assessed due to the lack of available data.

In conclusion, our study suggests that the development of lung cancer is associated with a family history of cancers, particularly lung cancer and multiple cancers.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was a standard submission to the journal. The article has undergone external peer review.

Peer Review File: Available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-1077/prf

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-1077/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Lin H, Huang YS, Yan HH, et al. A family history of cancer and lung cancer risk in never-smokers: A clinic-based case-control study. Lung Cancer 2015;89:94-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Cannon-Albright LA, Carr SR, Akerley W. Population-Based Relative Risks for Lung Cancer Based on Complete Family History of Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2019;14:1184-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Cassidy A, Balsan J, Vesin A, et al. Cancer diagnosis in first-degree relatives and non-small cell lung cancer risk: results from a multi-centre case-control study in Europe. Eur J Cancer 2009;45:3047-53. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Li J, Li C, Cheng B, et al. The Relative Impact of Family History of Different Cancers on Lung Cancer Risk. J Thorac Oncol 2019;14:e248-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Melzer AC, Triplette M. Screening high risk populations for lung cancer. BMJ 2022;376:o666. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Kim Y, Han BG. KoGES group. Cohort Profile: The Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) Consortium. Int J Epidemiol 2017;46:e20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Kim SH, Lee H, Joo H, et al. Risk of Rapid Lung Function Decline in Young Adults With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Community-Based Prospective Cohort Study. J Korean Med Sci 2023;38:e3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Lebrett MB, Crosbie EJ, Smith MJ, et al. Targeting lung cancer screening to individuals at greatest risk: the role of genetic factors. J Med Genet 2021;58:217-26. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Kim SH, Lee H, Kim BG, Kim SH, Sohn JW, Yoon HJ, Park DW. Impact of family history of cancer on development of lung cancer among the Korean population: a prospective cohort study using KoGES data. J Thorac Dis 2024;16(2):1741-1744. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1077

Download Citation