Indeterminate pulmonary nodules and prior malignancy: survival and recurrence after surgery in newly diagnosed stage I non-small cell lung cancer
Original Article

Indeterminate pulmonary nodules and prior malignancy: survival and recurrence after surgery in newly diagnosed stage I non-small cell lung cancer

José Franco1,2 ORCID logo, Genaro Galán3, Elvira Bondía1,2, Irene Pastor3, Andrea Calderón3, Amelia Insa2,4, Miguel Á. Mollá5, Paloma Martín-Martorell2,4, Juan A. Carbonell2 ORCID logo, Jaime Signes-Costa1,2 ORCID logo

1Department of Pneumology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; 2Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain; 3Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; 4Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; 5Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: J Franco, G Galán, A Insa, J Signes-Costa; (II) Administrative support: J Franco, J Signes-Costa; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: J Franco, E Bondía, I Pastor, A Calderón, A Insa, MÁ Mollá, P Martín-Martorell; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: J Franco; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: J Franco, G Galán, JA Carbonell, J Signes-Costa; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Correspondence to: José Franco, MD, PhD. Department of Pneumology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Avda. Blasco Ibáñez, 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain. Email: franco_jos@gva.es.

Background: Surgical excision biopsy remains the only reliable option in most cases of indeterminate pulmonary nodules, particularly in cancer survivors for whom surgery provides local control of pulmonary metastasis and the best chance of cure for early-stage lung cancer. Nevertheless, unnecessary surgeries remain a concern and the prognosis of newly diagnosed lung cancer might be influenced by the history of previous malignancy. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of resected indeterminate pulmonary nodules in patients with and without previous malignancy, and the impact of prior cancer history on survival and recurrence in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Methods: We retrospectively studied 176 resected indeterminate pulmonary nodules from 169 patients (58% with and 42% without previous cancer). Recurrence and overall survival (OS) were analyzed in newly diagnosed stage I NSCLC using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models.

Results: The rate of benign lesions was 15.3% (9.6% in the previous cancer group and 23.6% in the no previous cancer group). In stage I NSCLC patients (n=86), previous malignancy was associated with recurrence (P<0.001) but not OS (P=0.23). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and visceral pleural invasion were associated with impaired OS and recurrence. Mediastinal lymph node removal was associated with better OS.

Conclusions: The rate of benign resections among indeterminate pulmonary nodules in the no-previous cancer group more than doubled that of the previous cancer group and, in newly diagnosed stage I NSCLC patients, recurrence was independently associated with prior cancer. Therefore, in this setting, a history of previous malignancy should be taken into consideration when identifying patients at risk of tumor recurrence.

Keywords: Indeterminate pulmonary nodules; cancer survivors; early-stage lung cancer; recurrence; overall survival (OS)


Submitted Dec 04, 2023. Accepted for publication Mar 01, 2024. Published online May 10, 2024.

doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1834


Highlight box

Key findings

• The rate of benign resections was lower in patients with previous cancer.

• Recurrence in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was independently associated with prior cancer.

What is known and what is new?

• In patients with prior cancer history, resection of indeterminate pulmonary nodules provides local control of pulmonary metastasis and the best chance of cure for early-stage lung cancer.

• This study analyzes the outcomes of resected indeterminate pulmonary nodules in patients with and without previous malignancy, and the impact of prior cancer history on survival and recurrence in newly diagnosed stage I NSCLC.

What is the implication, and what should change now?

• For indeterminate pulmonary nodules being considered for surgery, the proportion of benign outcomes can be smaller in patients with prior cancer.

• For newly diagnosed stage I NSCLC, the history of previous malignancy should be taken into consideration when identifying patients at risk of recurrence.


Introduction

Background

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide (1). The majority of lung cancer patients are diagnosed with regional or distant advanced disease with a poor five-year survival rate of 34.8% and 8.2% respectively. Conversely, for localized disease survival comes to 62.8% at five years, but early-stage lung cancer accounts for only 21% of total cases (2). With the increasingly widespread use of imaging studies, particularly computed tomographic (CT) scans, the number of pulmonary nodules detected incidentally is growing continuously and represents an invaluable opportunity for early detection of lung cancer. As overall survival (OS) of oncological patients continues to increase, they represent a growing body who frequently undergo imaging for staging investigations or follow-up (3).

Rationale and knowledge gap

The final option in most cases of indeterminate pulmonary nodules is surgical excision biopsy, particularly in patients with a history of previous cancer, in whom surgery offers local control in metastatic disease and a curative option in the case of early-stage lung cancer (4). Nevertheless, unnecessary surgeries remain a concern and the prognosis of early-stage lung cancer might be influenced by the history of prior malignancy. Available retrospective data from studies focused generally on OS suggest a variable impact of prior cancer history on the prognosis of lung cancer patients. While for later stages a previous history of malignancy appears to be associated with improved OS, for early stages different studies have found either no effect (5) or impaired OS (6-8). Furthermore, studies evaluating the impact of prior cancer on recurrence following resection of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) yield conflicting results (7,9).

Objective

The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of resected indeterminate pulmonary nodules in patients with and without previous malignancy, and the impact of prior cancer history on survival and recurrence in newly diagnosed stage I NSCLC patients. We present this article in accordance with the STROBE reporting checklist (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-1834/rc).


Methods

Study design and patient selection

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board (Research Ethics Committee of Hospital Clínico Universitario INCLIVA, No. 2022/156), which waived the need for patient consent. We retrospectively reviewed data from patients with resected indeterminate pulmonary nodules from January 2015 to June 2020. For suspicious malignant nodules, preoperative diagnostic attempts by bronchoscopy or transthoracic needle biopsy were made depending on nodule size and location. Indeterminate pulmonary nodules, without a histological diagnosis, were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) including specialists in thoracic surgery, pulmonary medicine, medical and radiation oncology, thoracic and interventional radiology, and pathology.

In patients selected for surgery, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was the preferred surgical approach. Whenever possible, a wedge resection with intraoperative frozen-section examination was performed. The extent of resection and eventual mediastinal lymph node removal was decided by the operating surgeon based on the intraoperative frozen section analysis, patient functional status, nodule characteristics, and technical feasibility. In the case of benign or metastatic lesions, the main objective was to achieve a complete resection while preserving as much lung parenchyma as possible. Patients with peripheral tumors smaller than 2 cm or comorbidities were candidates for sublobar resections as long as adequate parenchymal margins could be obtained. Wedge resection was considered for frail patients or those with limited lung function. The decision not to remove the lymph nodes was usually made in order to minimize surgical intervention.

Patients with a history of lung metastasis, diffuse pulmonary nodules, or findings suggestive of nodal involvement on CT or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging were excluded from the analysis. Cases miscoded in the MDT database or with incomplete data were also not included (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Study flow chart. MDT, multidisciplinary team; CT, computed tomography; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Indeterminate pulmonary nodules

Data were collected on patient sex, age, previous history of malignancy (type and time since last cancer diagnosis, excluding non-melanoma skin cancer), smoking history, pulmonary function test parameters, diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), CT nodule characteristics, fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on PET/CT, surgical characteristics, and histology of the resection specimen. Patients were separated into two groups according to whether they had a history of previous cancer. Between-group comparisons were performed using χ2 test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Student’s t-test for continuous variables. As more than one nodule was resected in some patients, both nodule- and patient-level data were reported.

Recurrence and survival analysis in stage I NSCLC patients

All patients newly diagnosed with lung cancer were followed up in a dedicated oncology clinic. CT scan was obtained 3 months after surgery, then repeated every 3–6 months for up to a year, and thereafter on a yearly basis. Patient survival status was recorded until December 2021, and the primary outcome variables were freedom from recurrence (FFR) and OS. FFR was defined as the time from surgery to first diagnosis of local, regional, or distant recurrence, and was censored at the last follow-up or death without recurrence. OS was calculated from the date of surgery to date of death from any cause; for surviving patients, it was censored at the last contact date.

Statistical analysis

Between-group comparisons were performed using χ2 test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Student’s t-test for continuous variables. As more than one nodule was resected in some patients, both nodule- and patient-level data were reported.

In stage I NSCLC patients, FFR and OS curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons were made with the log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify variables associated with survival and recurrence outcomes. The variables considered included patient demographics and clinical characteristics, tumor characteristics, and surgical variables. To produce the final model, we used a backward elimination process, with 0.05 as the significance level of the Wald chi-squared test for a variable to remain in the model. All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0 (Armonk, NY, USA) except for Kaplan-Meier plots which were conducted using R version 4.0.0 (R Core, 2021). The cut-off for statistical significance was set at 0.05.


Results

Indeterminate pulmonary nodules

The analysis included 176 indeterminate pulmonary nodules from 169 patients: 58% (98/169) with a history of at least one previous cancer and 42% (71/169) with no previous malignancy. The most common sites of prior malignancy were colorectal in 29/98 patients (29.6%), lung in 25/98 (25.5%) and breast in 20/98 (20.4%), followed by bladder in 10/98 (10.2%), head and neck in 10/98 (10.2%), prostate in 6/98 (6.1%) and malignant melanoma in 6/98 (6.1%). Other malignancies were seen in 14/98 patients (14.3%).

Demographics, patient clinical characteristics and between-group comparisons are shown in Table 1. The percentage of patients with two or more nodules detected on CT images was not significantly different (P=0.46) between the two groups: 27.6% (27/98) for patients with previous cancer and 22.5% (16/71) for patients with no previous cancer. VATS was the preferred surgical approach (79.6% in patients with previous cancer and 85.9% in the no-previous cancer group). Nodule characteristics and between-group comparisons are shown in Table 2. A single nodule was resected in 162 patients, and two nodules were resected in each of the other seven patients. The metastatic nodule in the no previous cancer group was a metastatic leiomyosarcoma of unknown primary origin. The rate of benign outcomes among the total of resected nodules was 15.3% (27/176).

Table 1

Patient demographics and clinical characteristics (n=169)

Characteristics Previous cancer history P value
Yes (n=98) No (n=71)
Age (years), mean (SD) 66.8 (10.0) 66.2 (9.7) 0.70
Sex, n (%) 0.88
   Male 66 (67.3) 47 (66.2)
   Female 32 (32.7) 24 (33.8)
Smoking status, n (%) 0.12
   Never 22 (22.4) 14 (19.7)
   Former 48 (49.0) 26 (36.6)
   Current 28 (28.6) 31 (43.7)
Pack-years, mean (SD) 48.1 (26.1) 45.5 (23.9) 0.56
COPD, n (%) 0.81
   No 72 (73.5) 51 (71.8)
   Yes 26 (26.5) 20 (28.2)
Preoperative lung function testing, mean (SD)
   FEV1% predicted 90.7 (20.7) 91.6 (19.6) 0.79
   DLCO % predicted 70.2 (18.4) 77.3 (20.2) 0.02

SD, standard deviation; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in the first second; DLCO, diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide.

Table 2

Characteristics of resected nodules (n=176)

Characteristics Previous cancer history P value
Yes (n=104) No (n=72)
Size (mm), mean (SD) 13.6 (5.8) 14.8 (5.2) 0.18
Type, n (%) 0.37
   Solid 87 (83.7) 55 (76.4)
   Subsolid 12 (11.5) 10 (13.9)
   GGO 5 (4.8) 7 (9.7)
Spiculated margins, n (%) 0.14
   No 72 (69.2) 42 (58.3)
   Yes 32 (30.8) 30 (41.7)
Growth, n (%) 0.06
   No 43 (41.3) 40 (55.6)
   Yes 61 (58.7) 32 (44.4)
Location, n (%) 0.18
   Right upper lobe 31 (29.8) 26 (36.1)
   Right lower lobe 6 (5.8) 3 (4.2)
   Right middle lobe 21 (20.2) 13 (18.1)
   Left upper lobe
    Upper division 19 (18.3) 21 (29.2)
    Lingula 3 (2.9)
   Left lower lobe 24 (23.1) 9 (12.5)
SUVmax, mean (SD) 2.83 (2.9) 2.32 (2.6) 0.26
Type of resection, n (%) 0.02
   Lobectomy 29 (27.9) 34 (47.2)
   Segmentectomy 19 (18.3) 13 (18.1)
   Wedge 56 (53.8) 25 (34.7)
Pathological results, n (%) <0.001
   Benign 10 (9.6) 17 (23.6)
   Primary lung cancer 52 (50.0) 54 (75.0)
   Metastasis 42 (40.4) 1 (1.4)

SD, standard deviation; GGO, ground glass opacity; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value.

Variables associated with malignancy at patient-level were increasing age (P=0.002) and previous cancer history (P=0.005). At the nodule-level, significant variables associated with malignancy were growth (P=0.002), size over 10 mm (P=0.043), and higher maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) (P=0.001).

Within the previous cancer group, pathological results did not differ significantly (P>0.05) by patient history of pulmonary versus extrapulmonary cancer, single or multiple primary cancers or cancer diagnosis within the last 5 years (Table 3). There were also no significant differences by cancer type in the subgroup of patients with a history of a single extrapulmonary cancer, although primary lung cancer was the most common pathological diagnosis for head and neck, bladder, and other cancers. Additionally, no significant differences were found (P=0.67) between patients with single or multiple pulmonary nodules on CT images: benign 8.5% (6/71) and 7.4% (2/27) respectively, primary lung cancer 49.3% (35/71) and 59.3% (16/27) respectively, and metastasis 42.2% (30/71) and 33.3% (9/27) respectively.

Table 3

Pathological results of resected nodules according to cancer history in the previous cancer group (n=104)

Variables Benign Primary
lung cancer
Metastasis P value
Location of prior cancer (n=104) 0.77
   Pulmonary (n=27) 2 (7.4) 15 (55.6) 10 (37.0)
   Extrapulmonary (n=77) 8 (10.4) 37 (48.0) 32 (41.6)
History of multiple cancers (n=104) 0.58
   Yes (n=24) 1 (4.2) 13 (54.1) 10 (41.7)
   No (n=80) 9 (11.2) 39 (48.8) 32 (40.0)
Date of last cancer (n=104) 0.36
   ≥5 years ago (n=27) 1 (3.7) 16 (59.3) 10 (37.0)
   <5 years ago (n=77) 9 (11.7) 36 (46.7) 32 (41.6)
Type of neoplasm (n=63) 0.54
   Colon (n=23) 3 (13.0) 8 (34.8) 12 (52.2)
   Breast (n=14) 1 (7.1) 6 (42.9) 7 (50.0)
   Head and neck (n=8) 1 (12.5) 6 (75.0) 1 (12.5)
   Bladder (n=7) 4 (57.1) 3 (42.9)
   Others (n=11) 2 (18.2) 6 (54.5) 3 (27.3)

Data are presented as n (%). , irrespective of other cancers; , subgroup of patients with history of single extrapulmonary cancer.

Newly diagnosed lung cancers

A total of 104 patients were finally diagnosed with primary lung cancer, including two patients with synchronous primary tumors, of which only the highest stage tumor (both adenocarcinoma pT1bN0M0) was included in the analysis. Surgical variables, tumor characteristics and between-group comparisons are shown in Table 4. Most patients in both groups underwent anatomic resection, with lobectomy as the commonest approach used in 22/51 (43.1%) of patients with, and 31/53 (58.5%) without previous malignancy.

Table 4

Surgical variables and tumor characteristics of newly diagnosed primary lung cancers (n=104)

Variables Previous cancer history P value
Yes (n=51) No (n=53)
Resection, n (%) 0.16
   Anatomical 33 (64.7) 41 (77.4)
   Wedge 18 (35.3) 12 (22.6)
Nodal dissection or sampling, n (%) 0.08
   No 15 (29.4) 8 (15.1)
   Yes 36 (70.6) 45 (84.9)
Number of resected lymph nodes, mean (SD) 3.63 (4.4) 3.85 (3.3) 0.77
Surgical margins, n (%) 0.63
   Negative 48 (94.1) 50 (96.2)
   Positive 5 (5.9) 2 (3.8)
Angiolymphatic invasion, n (%) 0.66
   No 38 (86.4) 42 (89.4)
   Yes 6 (13.6) 5 (10.6)
Visceral pleural invasion, n (%) 0.96
   No 39 (76.5) 40 (76.9)
   Yes 12 (23.5) 12 (23.1)
Histology, n (%) 0.63
   Adenocarcinoma 40 (78.4) 41 (77.4)
   Squamous-cell carcinoma 8 (15.6) 5 (9.4)
   Large-cell carcinoma 1 (2.0) 1 (1.9)
   Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma 1 (2.0) 1 (1.9)
   Typical carcinoid 1 (2.0) 4 (7.5)
   Small-cell carcinoma 1 (1.9)
Pathological stage, n (%) 0.67
   In situ 3 (5.9) 7 (13.2)
   IA 39 (76.4) 34 (64.1)
   IB 6 (11.8) 8 (15.1)
   IIB 2 (3.9) 2 (3.8)
   IIIA 1 (2.0) 1 (1.9)
   IVA 1 (1.9)

, eighth edition TNM staging system. SD, standard deviation. TNM, tumor, node, metastasis.

Recurrence and survival in stage I NSCLC patients

Recurrence and survival were analyzed in the subset of stage I NSCLC patients (n=86) made up of 27 (31.4%) stage IA1, 34 (39.5%) stage IA2, 12 (14.0%) IA3, and 13 (15.1%) IB. Median follow-up time until death or censoring was 36 months. FFR and OS Kaplan-Meier curves according to previous cancer history are displayed in Figures 2,3, respectively. Previous malignancy was associated with impaired FFR (log-rank test, P<0.001) but no significant differences were found in OS (log-rank test, P=0.23). There were no significant differences in FFR or OS (log-rank test, P=0.76 and 0.99, respectively) between segmentectomy (16/86; 18.6%) and lobectomy (45/86; 52.3%). Within the previous cancer group, no significant differences (log-rank test, P>0.05) were found in FFR or OS among patients with history of pulmonary versus extrapulmonary cancer, more than one previous cancer, or last cancer diagnosed in the 5 years prior to lung cancer diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier FFR estimates at 5 years were 64% [95% confidence interval (CI): 50–81%] in the previous cancer group and 98% (95% CI: 93–100%) in the no previous cancer group (P<0.001). There were no significant between-group differences (P=0.24) in 5-year OS: 73% (95% CI: 57–94%) and 86% (95% CI: 75–98%) respectively. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses for FFR and OS are shown in Table 5. Previous cancer, COPD, and visceral pleural invasion were independent factors associated with impaired FFR, whereas COPD, visceral pleural invasion, and absence of lymph node dissection or sampling were independently associated with impaired OS.

Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier curves of freedom from recurrence for pathological stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients according to previous cancer history.
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival for pathological stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients according to previous cancer history.

Table 5

Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses for freedom from recurrence and overall survival of stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients (n=86)

Variables Freedom from recurrence Overall survival
Univariable Multivariable Univariable Multivariable
HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
Demographic and clinical characteristics
   Age, years 1.04 0.97–1.10 0.27 1.04 0.98–1.11 0.22
   Sex
    Female Reference Reference
    Male 1.54 0.60–4.78 0.46 2.89 0.65–12.93 0.17
   COPD
    No Reference Reference
    Yes 4.14 1.54–11.14 0.005* 7.52 1.73–32.56 0.007* 3.76 1.30–10.89 0.02* 5.94 1.42–24.79 0.01*
   Smoking history, pack-years 1.01 0.99–1.03 0.29 1.01 0.98–1.03 0.66
   Previous cancer
    No Reference Reference
    Yes 16.45 2.17–124.7 0.007* 12.80 1.48–110.9 0.021* 1.92 0.64–5.75 0.24
Tumor characteristics
   SUVmax 1.12 0.97–1.29 0.13 1.13 0.99–1.30 0.08
   Size
    <20 mm Reference
    ≥20 mm 0.50 0.11–2.20 0.36 0.61 0.14–2.75 0.52
   Histology
    Adenocarcinoma Reference Reference
    Others 1.05 0.83–1.33 0.71 1.19 0.40–3.57 0.75
   Angiolymphatic invasion
    No Reference Reference
    Yes 2.45 0.54–11.18 0.25 0.04 0.00–295.3 0.48
   Visceral pleura invasion
    No Reference Reference
    Yes 2.33 0.80–6.73 0.12 8.26 1.88–36.27 0.005* 2.10 0.65–6.76 0.21 4.76 1.13–19.95 0.03*
Surgical variables
   Resection
    Anatomical Reference Reference
    Wedge 4.69 1.70–12.92 0.003* 2.42 0.85–6.93 0.10
   Nodal dissection/sampling
    No Reference Reference
    Yes 0.20 0.07–0.54 0.001* 0.24 0.08–0.69 0.008* 0.25 0.07–0.95 0.042*
   Resected lymph nodes 0.80 0.66–0.98 0.03* 0.84 0.69–1.03 0.09
   Surgical margins
    Negative Reference Reference
    Positive 2.53 0.57–11.17 0.22 3.09 0.68–14.05 0.14

*, significant P values (<0.05). , excluding carcinoid tumors. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value.


Discussion

Indeterminate pulmonary nodules

In our study, after a multidisciplinary selection process, 15.3% of resected pulmonary nodules turned out to be benign. The percentage of benign diagnoses among surgically resected nodules has been proposed as a quality indicator (10), but the acceptable rate has not been established and a wide range of benign resections (12–86%) have been reported in the literature (11). We found a lower rate of benign resections in patients with previous cancer (9.6%) than in those without a previous cancer diagnosis (23.6%). Other authors have also found a lower percentage of benign resections among patients with a history of prior malignancy. In a large series of patients undergoing excisional biopsy for solitary pulmonary nodules the probability of being benign was 37% in patients with no history of cancer whereas this percentage was cut in half if there was a history of cancer (12). Rena et al. (4) found 10.2% of benign diagnoses (5 out of 49 nodules without pre-operative diagnosis) in patients with a history of previous malignancy.

Fifty percent of the nodules in our previous cancer group were diagnosed as primary lung cancer, and no association was found between the final diagnosis (metastasis, primary lung cancer or benign) and a past history of pulmonary versus extrapulmonary cancer, single versus multiple cancers or cancer diagnosis within the last 5 years. In the series of Mery et al. (12), there were also no differences between patients with a history of a single extrapulmonary cancer and those with a history of several tumors. A 5-year period after a diagnosis of cancer has been arbitrarily considered as ‘at risk for metastases’ (3); however, 74% of patients in our series with a history of malignancy had the previous cancer diagnosed within the last 5 years, and there was no association with a final diagnosis of metastasis.

For indeterminate pulmonary nodules in patients with history of extrapulmonary cancer, previous studies have demonstrated that the probability of metastasis depends on the histology of the previous tumor (12,13). In our subgroup of patients with prior single extrapulmonary malignancy, colon cancer accounted for the highest percentage of metastasis, while the lowest was for head and neck cancer. Conversely, previous head and neck cancer was associated with the highest percentage of primary lung cancer. Nevertheless, the differences were not significant probably due to small sample size after stratification by type of cancer.

Prior malignancy and lung cancer prognosis

Although there is currently insufficient data on the relationship between lung cancer and other malignancies (3), a prior cancer history seemingly has a heterogeneous impact on the prognosis of lung cancer patients. Survival analysis using large datasets found non-inferior (14) or slightly better (6,15) survival in advanced-stage lung cancer patients with prior cancer. However, the impact of previous cancer on the survival of early-stage lung cancer patients appears to be different. Pruitt et al. reported improved lung cancer-specific survival and no difference in all-cause OS among early-stage (defined as stage I and II) patients >65 years of age with prior cancer, although all-cause OS was slightly worse in the subset of these patients who had undergone surgical resection (5). In the study of Liu et al. (14), a history of prior cancer was associated with adverse OS in both stage I and II lung cancer patients under 65 years old. In a comprehensive study including a more complete range of adult patient ages, Monsalve et al. (6) reported worse survival across all treatment modalities in patients with stage I NSCLC with prior cancer history, with the strongest association among surgically managed patients. Likewise, a recent meta-analysis (8) found that surgically treated stage-I lung cancer patients with previous extrapulmonary malignancies had an inferior OS than those without.

Although in stage I NSCLC we did not find differences in OS between patients with or without previous malignancy, FFR was significantly impaired in the previous cancer group and prior cancer history was an independent factor associated with worse FFR. Lung cancer postoperative recurrences generally occur within the first 2 years (16); in our study, 87.5% (14 out of 16) of recurrences presented within 20 months following surgery. In a study on recurrence risk factors for stage I NSCLC patients who underwent lung resection, Wu et al. (9) found that a history of previous malignancy was independently associated with recurrence. In contrast, Schuchert et al. did not find previous malignancy to be a statistically significant predictor of recurrence following anatomic lung resection for clinical stage I NSCLC (17). The meta-analysis of Peng et al. (8) included only extrapulmonary malignancies, and two further studies that predominantly (7) or exclusively (18) included patients with a history of gastrointestinal cancer also found no association with recurrence.

In our multivariable analysis, we found other factors independently associated with survival or recurrence. COPD and visceral pleural invasion were independent factors associated with both, impaired OS and FFR. Conversely, mediastinal lymph node dissection or sampling was related with better OS. Mediastinal lymph node evaluation is an important predictor of prognosis when performing lobar or sublobar resection. In a study on patients with early-stage NSCLC, examination of at least one lymph node was associated with a survival benefit regardless of the extent of the sublobar resection (19). Although in our univariable analysis non-anatomical resection and a lower number of resected lymph nodes were associated with tumor recurrence, none of them turned out to be an independent predictor of poor prognosis in the multivariable analysis.

Limitations

Limitations of our study include the single-institution and retrospective nature of its design. In addition, the sample size and the small numbers after stratification precluded finding an association between previous cancer site and primary lung cancer or metastatic outcome. Furthermore, the survival analysis has an inherent selection bias since all newly diagnosed lung cancers derive from a specific cohort of resected indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Therefore, our results may not be generalizable to all patients with surgically treated stage I NSCLC.


Conclusions

In conclusion, 15.3% of the resected nodules in our study turned out to be benign, but the rate of benign resections in the no-previous cancer group more than doubled that of the previous cancer group. For newly diagnosed stage I NSCLC, a history of prior cancer was independently associated with recurrence. Therefore, in this setting, a history of previous malignancy should be taken into consideration when identifying patients at risk of tumor recurrence, particularly in the first two years after surgery. Large prospective studies are still needed to address the impact of previous cancer on the prognosis of surgically treated early-stage lung cancer.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the STROBE reporting checklist. Available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-1834/rc

Data Sharing Statement: Available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-1834/dss

Peer Review File: Available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-1834/prf

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-1834/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). This study was approved by our institutional review board (Research Ethics Committee of Hospital Clínico Universitario INCLIVA, No. 2022/156), which waived the need for patient consent.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209-49. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. National Cancer Institute, SEER 2013-2019. Percent of Cases & 5-Year Relative Survival by Stage at Diagnosis: Lung and Bronchus Cancer. Accessed November 21, 2023. Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/lungb.html
  3. Mets OM, Schaefer-Prokop CM, de Jong PA. Primary lung cancer in patients with previous malignancies: a nationwide study. Thorax 2019;74:492-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Rena O, Davoli F, Boldorini R, et al. The solitary pulmonary nodule in patients with previous cancer history: results of surgical treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013;39:1248-53. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Pruitt SL, Laccetti AL, Xuan L, et al. Revisiting a longstanding clinical trial exclusion criterion: impact of prior cancer in early-stage lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2017;116:717-25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Monsalve AF, Hoag JR, Resio BJ, et al. Variable impact of prior cancer history on the survival of lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer 2019;127:130-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Nakao K, Anraku M, Karasaki T, et al. Impact of Previous Malignancy on Outcome in Surgically Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2019;108:1671-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Peng L, Deng HY, Li D, et al. The impact of previous extrapulmonary malignancies on survival of surgically treated primary lung cancer: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg 2023;75:471-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Wu CF, Fu JY, Yeh CJ, et al. Recurrence Risk Factors Analysis for Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1337. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Slatore CG, Horeweg N, Jett JR, et al. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement: A Research Framework for Pulmonary Nodule Evaluation and Management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;192:500-14. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Callister ME, Baldwin DR, Akram AR, et al. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Thorax 2015;70:ii1-ii54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Mery CM, Pappas AN, Bueno R, et al. Relationship between a history of antecedent cancer and the probability of malignancy for a solitary pulmonary nodule. Chest 2004;125:2175-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Quint LE, Park CH, Iannettoni MD. Solitary pulmonary nodules in patients with extrapulmonary neoplasms. Radiology 2000;217:257-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Liu J, Zhou H, Zhang Y, et al. Impact of prior cancer history on the overall survival of younger patients with lung cancer. ESMO Open 2020;5:e000608. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Laccetti AL, Pruitt SL, Xuan L, et al. Effect of prior cancer on outcomes in advanced lung cancer: implications for clinical trial eligibility and accrual. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015;107:djv002. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Fedor D, Johnson WR, Singhal S. Local recurrence following lung cancer surgery: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Surg Oncol 2013;22:156-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Schuchert MJ, Abbas G, Awais O, et al. Anatomic segmentectomy for the solitary pulmonary nodule and early-stage lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:1780-5; discussion 1786-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Aokage K, Okada M, Suzuki K, et al. Is cancer history really an exclusion criterion for clinical trial of lung cancer? Influence of gastrointestinal tract cancer history on the outcomes of lung cancer surgery. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2017;47:145-56. [PubMed]
  19. Yendamuri S, Dhillon SS, Groman A, et al. Effect of the number of lymph nodes examined on the survival of patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer who undergo sublobar resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;156:394-402. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Franco J, Galán G, Bondía E, Pastor I, Calderón A, Insa A, Mollá MÁ, Martín-Martorell P, Carbonell JA, Signes-Costa J. Indeterminate pulmonary nodules and prior malignancy: survival and recurrence after surgery in newly diagnosed stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 2024;16(5):2757-2766. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1834

Download Citation