Erratum
Erratum to transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus reoperative conventional aortic valve replacement: a systematic review
Erratum to: J Thorac Dis 2016;8:E83-E93
Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus reoperative conventional aortic valve replacement: a systematic review
In the article that appeared on Page E83–E93, Vol 8, No 1 (January 2016) Issue of the Journal of Thoracic Disease (1), there is an error of Kevin Phan’s degree as “BS, MD”. The degree should have been shown as “BSc(Adv)”.
The publisher regrets the error.
References
- Phan K, Zhao DF, Wang N, et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus reoperative conventional aortic valve replacement: a systematic review. J Thorac Dis 2016;8:E83-93. [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Erratum to transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus reoperative conventional aortic valve replacement: a systematic review. J Thorac Dis 2016;8(9):E1111. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.09.33
